Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study

Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) control and postoperative complications following a non-valved glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery in refractory glaucoma. Methods: This was a prospective interventional study conducted on patients with glaucoma refractory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P Jayasri, Subashini Kaliaperumal, Geeta Behera, Mary Stephen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2022;volume=70;issue=12;spage=4212;epage=4216;aulast=Jayasri
_version_ 1798006486839853056
author P Jayasri
Subashini Kaliaperumal
Geeta Behera
Mary Stephen
author_facet P Jayasri
Subashini Kaliaperumal
Geeta Behera
Mary Stephen
author_sort P Jayasri
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) control and postoperative complications following a non-valved glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery in refractory glaucoma. Methods: This was a prospective interventional study conducted on patients with glaucoma refractory to maximal medications or failed surgical treatment who underwent Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI; Aurolabs, India) surgery. Primary outcome measures were IOP control, postoperative complications, and reduction in the number of antiglaucoma medications (AGM). Results: Thirty-four eyes were analyzed and the mean follow-up was 16.06 ± 5.63 months. The preoperative median (Q1, Q3) IOP was 31 mmHg (28, 36.5) which decreased to 12 mmHg (12, 14) at 6 months postoperatively. The median (Q1, Q3) number of AGMs decreased from 3 (3, 4) to 0 (0, 1). Significant complications like implant extrusion and tube exposure were noted in two eyes. The total success and failure rates at 6 months were 91.1% and 8.8%, respectively. Conclusion: AADI is effective in achieving target IOP and significantly reduces the use of AGMs with good safety in the short term. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to assess long-term IOP control and cost-effectiveness.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:56:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efbeedf670ee47d6bd70e915c9b1f6ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:56:37Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-efbeedf670ee47d6bd70e915c9b1f6ef2022-12-22T04:23:04ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892022-01-0170124212421610.4103/ijo.IJO_1391_22Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective studyP JayasriSubashini KaliaperumalGeeta BeheraMary StephenPurpose: This study was conducted to assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) control and postoperative complications following a non-valved glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery in refractory glaucoma. Methods: This was a prospective interventional study conducted on patients with glaucoma refractory to maximal medications or failed surgical treatment who underwent Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI; Aurolabs, India) surgery. Primary outcome measures were IOP control, postoperative complications, and reduction in the number of antiglaucoma medications (AGM). Results: Thirty-four eyes were analyzed and the mean follow-up was 16.06 ± 5.63 months. The preoperative median (Q1, Q3) IOP was 31 mmHg (28, 36.5) which decreased to 12 mmHg (12, 14) at 6 months postoperatively. The median (Q1, Q3) number of AGMs decreased from 3 (3, 4) to 0 (0, 1). Significant complications like implant extrusion and tube exposure were noted in two eyes. The total success and failure rates at 6 months were 91.1% and 8.8%, respectively. Conclusion: AADI is effective in achieving target IOP and significantly reduces the use of AGMs with good safety in the short term. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to assess long-term IOP control and cost-effectiveness.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2022;volume=70;issue=12;spage=4212;epage=4216;aulast=Jayasriaurolab aqueous drainage implant (aadi)glaucoma drainage deviceglaucoma surgeryintraocular pressure (iop)refractory glaucoma
spellingShingle P Jayasri
Subashini Kaliaperumal
Geeta Behera
Mary Stephen
Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
aurolab aqueous drainage implant (aadi)
glaucoma drainage device
glaucoma surgery
intraocular pressure (iop)
refractory glaucoma
title Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
title_full Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
title_short Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
title_sort safety and efficacy of aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma a prospective study
topic aurolab aqueous drainage implant (aadi)
glaucoma drainage device
glaucoma surgery
intraocular pressure (iop)
refractory glaucoma
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2022;volume=70;issue=12;spage=4212;epage=4216;aulast=Jayasri
work_keys_str_mv AT pjayasri safetyandefficacyofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplantinrefractoryglaucomaaprospectivestudy
AT subashinikaliaperumal safetyandefficacyofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplantinrefractoryglaucomaaprospectivestudy
AT geetabehera safetyandefficacyofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplantinrefractoryglaucomaaprospectivestudy
AT marystephen safetyandefficacyofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplantinrefractoryglaucomaaprospectivestudy