A comparison of analgesic efficacy between oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and intravenous morphine for laparascopic cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe ultrasound-guided oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) block provides a wider area of sensory block to the anterior abdominal wall than the classical posterior approach. We compared the intra-operative analgesic efficacy of OSTAP block with conventional intravenous (IV...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chee Kean Chen, Peter Chee Seong Tan, Vui Eng Phui, Shu Ching Teo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2013-06-01
Series:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-64-511.pdf
_version_ 1818966373508841472
author Chee Kean Chen
Peter Chee Seong Tan
Vui Eng Phui
Shu Ching Teo
author_facet Chee Kean Chen
Peter Chee Seong Tan
Vui Eng Phui
Shu Ching Teo
author_sort Chee Kean Chen
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe ultrasound-guided oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) block provides a wider area of sensory block to the anterior abdominal wall than the classical posterior approach. We compared the intra-operative analgesic efficacy of OSTAP block with conventional intravenous (IV) morphine during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.MethodsForty adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under standard general anesthesia, were randomly assigned for either bilateral OSTAP block using 1.5 mg/kg ropivacaine on each side (n = 20) or IV morphine 0.1 mg/kg (n = 20). The intra-operative pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure were monitored every five minutes. Repetitive boluses of IV fentanyl 0.5 µg/kg were given as rescue analgesia when any of the above-mentioned parameters rose more than 15% from the baseline values. Time to extubation was documented. Additional boluses of IV morphine 0.05 mg/kg were administered in the recovery room if the recorded visual analogue score (VAS) was more than 4. Nausea and vomiting score, as well as sedation score were recorded.ResultsThe morphine group required more rescue fentanyl as compared to the OSTAP block group but the difference was not significant statistically. Time to extubation was significantly shorter in the OSTAP block group (mean [SD] 10.4 [2.60] vs 12.4 [2.54] min; P = 0.021). Both methods provided excellent analgesia and did not differ in postoperative morphine requirements. No between-group differences in sedation score and incidence of nausea and vomiting were demonstrated.ConclusionsUltrasound-guided OSTAP block has an important role as part of balanced anesthesia. It is as efficacious as IV morphine in providing effective analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T13:31:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efc1b8382b28407f8780aa6da5603121
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2005-6419
2005-7563
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T13:31:52Z
publishDate 2013-06-01
publisher Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format Article
series Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-efc1b8382b28407f8780aa6da56031212022-12-21T19:39:04ZengKorean Society of AnesthesiologistsKorean Journal of Anesthesiology2005-64192005-75632013-06-0164651151610.4097/kjae.2013.64.6.5117593A comparison of analgesic efficacy between oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and intravenous morphine for laparascopic cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized controlled trialChee Kean Chen0Peter Chee Seong Tan1Vui Eng Phui2Shu Ching Teo3Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Normah Medical Specialist Centre, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.Department of Anesthesiology, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.Department of Anesthesiology, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.Department of Anesthesiology, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.BackgroundThe ultrasound-guided oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) block provides a wider area of sensory block to the anterior abdominal wall than the classical posterior approach. We compared the intra-operative analgesic efficacy of OSTAP block with conventional intravenous (IV) morphine during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.MethodsForty adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under standard general anesthesia, were randomly assigned for either bilateral OSTAP block using 1.5 mg/kg ropivacaine on each side (n = 20) or IV morphine 0.1 mg/kg (n = 20). The intra-operative pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure were monitored every five minutes. Repetitive boluses of IV fentanyl 0.5 µg/kg were given as rescue analgesia when any of the above-mentioned parameters rose more than 15% from the baseline values. Time to extubation was documented. Additional boluses of IV morphine 0.05 mg/kg were administered in the recovery room if the recorded visual analogue score (VAS) was more than 4. Nausea and vomiting score, as well as sedation score were recorded.ResultsThe morphine group required more rescue fentanyl as compared to the OSTAP block group but the difference was not significant statistically. Time to extubation was significantly shorter in the OSTAP block group (mean [SD] 10.4 [2.60] vs 12.4 [2.54] min; P = 0.021). Both methods provided excellent analgesia and did not differ in postoperative morphine requirements. No between-group differences in sedation score and incidence of nausea and vomiting were demonstrated.ConclusionsUltrasound-guided OSTAP block has an important role as part of balanced anesthesia. It is as efficacious as IV morphine in providing effective analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-64-511.pdflaparascopic cholecystectomyoblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane blockultrasound-guided regional anesthesia
spellingShingle Chee Kean Chen
Peter Chee Seong Tan
Vui Eng Phui
Shu Ching Teo
A comparison of analgesic efficacy between oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and intravenous morphine for laparascopic cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized controlled trial
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
laparascopic cholecystectomy
oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block
ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia
title A comparison of analgesic efficacy between oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and intravenous morphine for laparascopic cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full A comparison of analgesic efficacy between oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and intravenous morphine for laparascopic cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr A comparison of analgesic efficacy between oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and intravenous morphine for laparascopic cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of analgesic efficacy between oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and intravenous morphine for laparascopic cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short A comparison of analgesic efficacy between oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and intravenous morphine for laparascopic cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of analgesic efficacy between oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and intravenous morphine for laparascopic cholecystectomy a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic laparascopic cholecystectomy
oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block
ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia
url http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-64-511.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cheekeanchen acomparisonofanalgesicefficacybetweenobliquesubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockandintravenousmorphineforlaparascopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT petercheeseongtan acomparisonofanalgesicefficacybetweenobliquesubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockandintravenousmorphineforlaparascopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vuiengphui acomparisonofanalgesicefficacybetweenobliquesubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockandintravenousmorphineforlaparascopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shuchingteo acomparisonofanalgesicefficacybetweenobliquesubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockandintravenousmorphineforlaparascopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cheekeanchen comparisonofanalgesicefficacybetweenobliquesubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockandintravenousmorphineforlaparascopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT petercheeseongtan comparisonofanalgesicefficacybetweenobliquesubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockandintravenousmorphineforlaparascopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vuiengphui comparisonofanalgesicefficacybetweenobliquesubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockandintravenousmorphineforlaparascopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shuchingteo comparisonofanalgesicefficacybetweenobliquesubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockandintravenousmorphineforlaparascopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial