Noninvasive monitoring of PaCO<sub>2</sub> during one-lung ventilation and minimal access surgery in adults: End-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques

<b>Background:</b> Previous studies have suggested that end-tidal CO<sub> 2</sub> (ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> ) may be inaccurate during one-lung ventilation (OLV). This study was performed to compare the accuracy of the noninvasive monitoring of PCO<sub> 2</su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cox Paul, Tobias Joseph
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2007-01-01
Series:Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2007;volume=3;issue=1;spage=8;epage=13;aulast=Cox
_version_ 1819327378378194944
author Cox Paul
Tobias Joseph
author_facet Cox Paul
Tobias Joseph
author_sort Cox Paul
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background:</b> Previous studies have suggested that end-tidal CO<sub> 2</sub> (ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> ) may be inaccurate during one-lung ventilation (OLV). This study was performed to compare the accuracy of the noninvasive monitoring of PCO<sub> 2</sub> using transcutaneous CO<sub> 2</sub> (TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> ) with ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) during OLV. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> In adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgical procedures, PCO<sub> 2</sub> was simultaneously measured with TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> and ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> devices and compared with PaCO<sub> 2</sub> . <b> Results:</b> The cohort for the study included 15 patients ranging in age from 19 to 71 years and in weight from 76 to 126 kg. During TLV, the difference between the TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> and the PaCO<sub> 2</sub> was 3.0 &#x00B1; 1.8 mmHg and the difference between the ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> and PaCO<sub> 2</sub> was 6.2 &#x00B1; 4.7 mmHg (<i> P</i> =0.02). Linear regression analysis of TC-CO2 <i> vs.</i> PaCO<sub> 2</sub> resulted in an r<sup> 2</sup> = 0.6280 and a slope = 0.7650 &#x00B1; 0.1428, while linear regression analysis of ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> <i> vs.</i> PaCO<sub> 2</sub> resulted in an r<sup> 2</sup> = 0.05528 and a slope = 0.1986 &#x00B1; 0.1883. During OLV, the difference between the TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> and PaCO<sub> 2</sub> was 3.5 &#x00B1; 1.7 mmHg and the ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> to PaCO<sub> 2</sub> difference was 9.6 &#x00B1; 3.6 mmHg (<i> P</i> =0.03 <i> vs.</i> ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> to PaCO<sub> 2</sub> difference during TLV; and <i> P</i> &#60; 0.0001 <i> vs.</i> TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> to PaCO<sub> 2</sub> difference during OLV). In 13 of the 15 patients, the TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> value was closer to the actual PaCO<sub> 2</sub> than the ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> value (<i> P</i> =0.0001). Linear regression analysis of TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> <i> vs.</i> PaCO<sub> 2</sub> resulted in an r<sup> 2</sup> = 0.7827 and a slope = 0.8142 &#x00B1; 0.0.07965, while linear regression analysis of ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> <i> vs.</i> PaCO<sub> 2</sub> resulted in an r<sup> 2</sup> = 0.2989 and a slope = 0.3026 &#x00B1; 0.08605. <b> Conclusions:</b> During OLV, TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> monitoring provides a better estimate of PaCO<sub> 2</sub> than ET-CO2 in patients undergoing VATS.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T13:09:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efc766ad4ccf40dca0b75f48972c4c8f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-9941
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T13:09:53Z
publishDate 2007-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
spelling doaj.art-efc766ad4ccf40dca0b75f48972c4c8f2022-12-21T16:53:54ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Minimal Access Surgery0972-99412007-01-0131813Noninvasive monitoring of PaCO<sub>2</sub> during one-lung ventilation and minimal access surgery in adults: End-tidal versus transcutaneous techniquesCox PaulTobias Joseph<b>Background:</b> Previous studies have suggested that end-tidal CO<sub> 2</sub> (ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> ) may be inaccurate during one-lung ventilation (OLV). This study was performed to compare the accuracy of the noninvasive monitoring of PCO<sub> 2</sub> using transcutaneous CO<sub> 2</sub> (TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> ) with ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) during OLV. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> In adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgical procedures, PCO<sub> 2</sub> was simultaneously measured with TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> and ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> devices and compared with PaCO<sub> 2</sub> . <b> Results:</b> The cohort for the study included 15 patients ranging in age from 19 to 71 years and in weight from 76 to 126 kg. During TLV, the difference between the TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> and the PaCO<sub> 2</sub> was 3.0 &#x00B1; 1.8 mmHg and the difference between the ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> and PaCO<sub> 2</sub> was 6.2 &#x00B1; 4.7 mmHg (<i> P</i> =0.02). Linear regression analysis of TC-CO2 <i> vs.</i> PaCO<sub> 2</sub> resulted in an r<sup> 2</sup> = 0.6280 and a slope = 0.7650 &#x00B1; 0.1428, while linear regression analysis of ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> <i> vs.</i> PaCO<sub> 2</sub> resulted in an r<sup> 2</sup> = 0.05528 and a slope = 0.1986 &#x00B1; 0.1883. During OLV, the difference between the TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> and PaCO<sub> 2</sub> was 3.5 &#x00B1; 1.7 mmHg and the ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> to PaCO<sub> 2</sub> difference was 9.6 &#x00B1; 3.6 mmHg (<i> P</i> =0.03 <i> vs.</i> ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> to PaCO<sub> 2</sub> difference during TLV; and <i> P</i> &#60; 0.0001 <i> vs.</i> TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> to PaCO<sub> 2</sub> difference during OLV). In 13 of the 15 patients, the TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> value was closer to the actual PaCO<sub> 2</sub> than the ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> value (<i> P</i> =0.0001). Linear regression analysis of TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> <i> vs.</i> PaCO<sub> 2</sub> resulted in an r<sup> 2</sup> = 0.7827 and a slope = 0.8142 &#x00B1; 0.0.07965, while linear regression analysis of ET-CO<sub> 2</sub> <i> vs.</i> PaCO<sub> 2</sub> resulted in an r<sup> 2</sup> = 0.2989 and a slope = 0.3026 &#x00B1; 0.08605. <b> Conclusions:</b> During OLV, TC-CO<sub> 2</sub> monitoring provides a better estimate of PaCO<sub> 2</sub> than ET-CO2 in patients undergoing VATS.http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2007;volume=3;issue=1;spage=8;epage=13;aulast=CoxEnd-tidal CO<sub> 2</sub>thoracoscopytranscutaneous CO<sub> 2</sub>
spellingShingle Cox Paul
Tobias Joseph
Noninvasive monitoring of PaCO<sub>2</sub> during one-lung ventilation and minimal access surgery in adults: End-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
End-tidal CO<sub> 2</sub>
thoracoscopy
transcutaneous CO<sub> 2</sub>
title Noninvasive monitoring of PaCO<sub>2</sub> during one-lung ventilation and minimal access surgery in adults: End-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques
title_full Noninvasive monitoring of PaCO<sub>2</sub> during one-lung ventilation and minimal access surgery in adults: End-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques
title_fullStr Noninvasive monitoring of PaCO<sub>2</sub> during one-lung ventilation and minimal access surgery in adults: End-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive monitoring of PaCO<sub>2</sub> during one-lung ventilation and minimal access surgery in adults: End-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques
title_short Noninvasive monitoring of PaCO<sub>2</sub> during one-lung ventilation and minimal access surgery in adults: End-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques
title_sort noninvasive monitoring of paco sub 2 sub during one lung ventilation and minimal access surgery in adults end tidal versus transcutaneous techniques
topic End-tidal CO<sub> 2</sub>
thoracoscopy
transcutaneous CO<sub> 2</sub>
url http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2007;volume=3;issue=1;spage=8;epage=13;aulast=Cox
work_keys_str_mv AT coxpaul noninvasivemonitoringofpacosub2subduringonelungventilationandminimalaccesssurgeryinadultsendtidalversustranscutaneoustechniques
AT tobiasjoseph noninvasivemonitoringofpacosub2subduringonelungventilationandminimalaccesssurgeryinadultsendtidalversustranscutaneoustechniques