The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies

Arguments about fallacies generally attempt to distinguish real from apparent modes of argumentation and reasoning. To examine the structure of these arguments, this paper develops a theory of dialectical distinction. First, it explores the connection between Nicholas Rescher's concept of disti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Goodwin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 1992-01-01
Series:Informal Logic
Subjects:
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2522
_version_ 1811222328558747648
author David Goodwin
author_facet David Goodwin
author_sort David Goodwin
collection DOAJ
description Arguments about fallacies generally attempt to distinguish real from apparent modes of argumentation and reasoning. To examine the structure of these arguments, this paper develops a theory of dialectical distinction. First, it explores the connection between Nicholas Rescher's concept of distinction as a "dialectical countermove" and Chaim Perelman and L. Olbrecht-Tyteca's "dissociation of ideas." Next, it applies a theory of distinction to Aristotle's extended arguments about fallacies in De Sophisticis Elenchis, primarily with a view to analyzing its underlying strategies of argumentation. Finally, it examines how second-order distinctions (those designed to challenge previously formulated distinctions) underpin current arguments against the Aristotelian or "Standard Treatment" of the fallacies.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T08:15:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efca150c347f4e5c877840105e83375a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T08:15:03Z
publishDate 1992-01-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series Informal Logic
spelling doaj.art-efca150c347f4e5c877840105e83375a2022-12-22T03:40:51ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X1992-01-0114110.22329/il.v14i1.2522The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about FallaciesDavid GoodwinArguments about fallacies generally attempt to distinguish real from apparent modes of argumentation and reasoning. To examine the structure of these arguments, this paper develops a theory of dialectical distinction. First, it explores the connection between Nicholas Rescher's concept of distinction as a "dialectical countermove" and Chaim Perelman and L. Olbrecht-Tyteca's "dissociation of ideas." Next, it applies a theory of distinction to Aristotle's extended arguments about fallacies in De Sophisticis Elenchis, primarily with a view to analyzing its underlying strategies of argumentation. Finally, it examines how second-order distinctions (those designed to challenge previously formulated distinctions) underpin current arguments against the Aristotelian or "Standard Treatment" of the fallacies.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2522informal logicargumentation history and theoryrhetorical theorydialectic
spellingShingle David Goodwin
The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies
Informal Logic
informal logic
argumentation history and theory
rhetorical theory
dialectic
title The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies
title_full The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies
title_fullStr The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies
title_full_unstemmed The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies
title_short The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies
title_sort dialectic of second order distinctions the structure of arguments about fallacies
topic informal logic
argumentation history and theory
rhetorical theory
dialectic
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2522
work_keys_str_mv AT davidgoodwin thedialecticofsecondorderdistinctionsthestructureofargumentsaboutfallacies
AT davidgoodwin dialecticofsecondorderdistinctionsthestructureofargumentsaboutfallacies