Write and Let Go: An Online Writing Program for University Students

BackgroundThere are a plethora of studies on expressive writing and positive writing interventions, but few have addressed the combination of both paradigms. Additionally, research on the role of ambivalence toward change in the context of writing-based interventions is lacking. Ambivalence toward c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: João Batista, Janine C. Marinai, Melissa Gouveia, João Tiago Oliveira, Miguel M. Gonçalves
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874600/full
_version_ 1828331901477191680
author João Batista
Janine C. Marinai
Melissa Gouveia
João Tiago Oliveira
Miguel M. Gonçalves
author_facet João Batista
Janine C. Marinai
Melissa Gouveia
João Tiago Oliveira
Miguel M. Gonçalves
author_sort João Batista
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThere are a plethora of studies on expressive writing and positive writing interventions, but few have addressed the combination of both paradigms. Additionally, research on the role of ambivalence toward change in the context of writing-based interventions is lacking. Ambivalence toward change is a natural movement of approaching and avoiding change that may occur in various situations. In psychotherapy, its resolution is associated with successful outcomes.AimThis study tested the efficacy of a combination of expressive and positive writing paradigms in an internet-based intervention to improve university students’ mental health. Additionally, focusing participants on a current, unresolved problem allowed us to explore the possible role of ambivalence toward change as a mediator of the intervention’s results.MethodsWe recruited 172 participants who were randomly divided into experimental (n = 85) and control (n = 87) groups. The intervention consisted of the identification of a current problem and four writing tasks on consecutive days. Assessment was conducted at baseline and posttest in both groups and at follow-up in the experimental group. Participants in the experimental condition were also assessed after each task. Measures of anxiety, depression, rumination, ambivalence toward change, distress, and wellbeing (optimism, affect, and satisfaction with life) were collected.ResultsMultivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) showed that participants in the experimental group had a significant decrease from baseline to posttest in ambivalence toward change and rumination when compared with the control group. These results were maintained at follow-up. No differences were found in the remaining measures. Within the experimental group, ambivalence toward change, rumination, and distress significantly decreased throughout the intervention and the exploratory mediation analysis indicated that ambivalence toward change partially mediated the improvements in rumination and distress.DiscussionConsidering different perspectives about a current problem and using a combination of expressive and positive writing fostered the reduction of ambivalence toward change and rumination. Ambivalence toward change reduction after the second writing task may have created optimal conditions for the subsequent decrease in rumination and distress. Future studies should replicate this finding and dismantle the components that are more adequate in changing these variables.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:58:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efce3016f2454fc7999ff5b24bf80f6e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:58:34Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-efce3016f2454fc7999ff5b24bf80f6e2022-12-22T02:30:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-07-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.874600874600Write and Let Go: An Online Writing Program for University StudentsJoão BatistaJanine C. MarinaiMelissa GouveiaJoão Tiago OliveiraMiguel M. GonçalvesBackgroundThere are a plethora of studies on expressive writing and positive writing interventions, but few have addressed the combination of both paradigms. Additionally, research on the role of ambivalence toward change in the context of writing-based interventions is lacking. Ambivalence toward change is a natural movement of approaching and avoiding change that may occur in various situations. In psychotherapy, its resolution is associated with successful outcomes.AimThis study tested the efficacy of a combination of expressive and positive writing paradigms in an internet-based intervention to improve university students’ mental health. Additionally, focusing participants on a current, unresolved problem allowed us to explore the possible role of ambivalence toward change as a mediator of the intervention’s results.MethodsWe recruited 172 participants who were randomly divided into experimental (n = 85) and control (n = 87) groups. The intervention consisted of the identification of a current problem and four writing tasks on consecutive days. Assessment was conducted at baseline and posttest in both groups and at follow-up in the experimental group. Participants in the experimental condition were also assessed after each task. Measures of anxiety, depression, rumination, ambivalence toward change, distress, and wellbeing (optimism, affect, and satisfaction with life) were collected.ResultsMultivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) showed that participants in the experimental group had a significant decrease from baseline to posttest in ambivalence toward change and rumination when compared with the control group. These results were maintained at follow-up. No differences were found in the remaining measures. Within the experimental group, ambivalence toward change, rumination, and distress significantly decreased throughout the intervention and the exploratory mediation analysis indicated that ambivalence toward change partially mediated the improvements in rumination and distress.DiscussionConsidering different perspectives about a current problem and using a combination of expressive and positive writing fostered the reduction of ambivalence toward change and rumination. Ambivalence toward change reduction after the second writing task may have created optimal conditions for the subsequent decrease in rumination and distress. Future studies should replicate this finding and dismantle the components that are more adequate in changing these variables.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874600/fullexpressive writingambivalenceonline interventionwriting based interventionscombined writingpositive writing
spellingShingle João Batista
Janine C. Marinai
Melissa Gouveia
João Tiago Oliveira
Miguel M. Gonçalves
Write and Let Go: An Online Writing Program for University Students
Frontiers in Psychology
expressive writing
ambivalence
online intervention
writing based interventions
combined writing
positive writing
title Write and Let Go: An Online Writing Program for University Students
title_full Write and Let Go: An Online Writing Program for University Students
title_fullStr Write and Let Go: An Online Writing Program for University Students
title_full_unstemmed Write and Let Go: An Online Writing Program for University Students
title_short Write and Let Go: An Online Writing Program for University Students
title_sort write and let go an online writing program for university students
topic expressive writing
ambivalence
online intervention
writing based interventions
combined writing
positive writing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874600/full
work_keys_str_mv AT joaobatista writeandletgoanonlinewritingprogramforuniversitystudents
AT janinecmarinai writeandletgoanonlinewritingprogramforuniversitystudents
AT melissagouveia writeandletgoanonlinewritingprogramforuniversitystudents
AT joaotiagooliveira writeandletgoanonlinewritingprogramforuniversitystudents
AT miguelmgoncalves writeandletgoanonlinewritingprogramforuniversitystudents