Ancestral resurrection reveals evolutionary mechanisms of kinase plasticity

Protein kinases have evolved diverse specificities to enable cellular information processing. To gain insight into the mechanisms underlying kinase diversification, we studied the CMGC protein kinases using ancestral reconstruction. Within this group, the cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) and mitogen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Conor J Howard, Victor Hanson-Smith, Kristopher J Kennedy, Chad J Miller, Hua Jane Lou, Alexander D Johnson, Benjamin E Turk, Liam J Holt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2014-10-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/04126
_version_ 1818028355630399488
author Conor J Howard
Victor Hanson-Smith
Kristopher J Kennedy
Chad J Miller
Hua Jane Lou
Alexander D Johnson
Benjamin E Turk
Liam J Holt
author_facet Conor J Howard
Victor Hanson-Smith
Kristopher J Kennedy
Chad J Miller
Hua Jane Lou
Alexander D Johnson
Benjamin E Turk
Liam J Holt
author_sort Conor J Howard
collection DOAJ
description Protein kinases have evolved diverse specificities to enable cellular information processing. To gain insight into the mechanisms underlying kinase diversification, we studied the CMGC protein kinases using ancestral reconstruction. Within this group, the cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) and mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs) require proline at the +1 position of their substrates, while Ime2 prefers arginine. The resurrected common ancestor of CDKs, MAPKs, and Ime2 could phosphorylate substrates with +1 proline or arginine, with preference for proline. This specificity changed to a strong preference for +1 arginine in the lineage leading to Ime2 via an intermediate with equal specificity for proline and arginine. Mutant analysis revealed that a variable residue within the kinase catalytic cleft, DFGx, modulates +1 specificity. Expansion of Ime2 kinase specificity by mutation of this residue did not cause dominant deleterious effects in vivo. Tolerance of cells to new specificities likely enabled the evolutionary divergence of kinases.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T05:02:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efd49d302c32441494c383b83fc91f84
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-084X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T05:02:29Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj.art-efd49d302c32441494c383b83fc91f842022-12-22T02:01:22ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2014-10-01310.7554/eLife.04126Ancestral resurrection reveals evolutionary mechanisms of kinase plasticityConor J Howard0Victor Hanson-Smith1Kristopher J Kennedy2Chad J Miller3Hua Jane Lou4Alexander D Johnson5Benjamin E Turk6Liam J Holt7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4002-0861Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United StatesDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United StatesDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United StatesDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United StatesDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United StatesDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United StatesDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United StatesDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United StatesProtein kinases have evolved diverse specificities to enable cellular information processing. To gain insight into the mechanisms underlying kinase diversification, we studied the CMGC protein kinases using ancestral reconstruction. Within this group, the cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) and mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs) require proline at the +1 position of their substrates, while Ime2 prefers arginine. The resurrected common ancestor of CDKs, MAPKs, and Ime2 could phosphorylate substrates with +1 proline or arginine, with preference for proline. This specificity changed to a strong preference for +1 arginine in the lineage leading to Ime2 via an intermediate with equal specificity for proline and arginine. Mutant analysis revealed that a variable residue within the kinase catalytic cleft, DFGx, modulates +1 specificity. Expansion of Ime2 kinase specificity by mutation of this residue did not cause dominant deleterious effects in vivo. Tolerance of cells to new specificities likely enabled the evolutionary divergence of kinases.https://elifesciences.org/articles/04126protein kinaseevolutionancestral reconstructioncyclin-dependent kinaseIme2phosphoregulatory network
spellingShingle Conor J Howard
Victor Hanson-Smith
Kristopher J Kennedy
Chad J Miller
Hua Jane Lou
Alexander D Johnson
Benjamin E Turk
Liam J Holt
Ancestral resurrection reveals evolutionary mechanisms of kinase plasticity
eLife
protein kinase
evolution
ancestral reconstruction
cyclin-dependent kinase
Ime2
phosphoregulatory network
title Ancestral resurrection reveals evolutionary mechanisms of kinase plasticity
title_full Ancestral resurrection reveals evolutionary mechanisms of kinase plasticity
title_fullStr Ancestral resurrection reveals evolutionary mechanisms of kinase plasticity
title_full_unstemmed Ancestral resurrection reveals evolutionary mechanisms of kinase plasticity
title_short Ancestral resurrection reveals evolutionary mechanisms of kinase plasticity
title_sort ancestral resurrection reveals evolutionary mechanisms of kinase plasticity
topic protein kinase
evolution
ancestral reconstruction
cyclin-dependent kinase
Ime2
phosphoregulatory network
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/04126
work_keys_str_mv AT conorjhoward ancestralresurrectionrevealsevolutionarymechanismsofkinaseplasticity
AT victorhansonsmith ancestralresurrectionrevealsevolutionarymechanismsofkinaseplasticity
AT kristopherjkennedy ancestralresurrectionrevealsevolutionarymechanismsofkinaseplasticity
AT chadjmiller ancestralresurrectionrevealsevolutionarymechanismsofkinaseplasticity
AT huajanelou ancestralresurrectionrevealsevolutionarymechanismsofkinaseplasticity
AT alexanderdjohnson ancestralresurrectionrevealsevolutionarymechanismsofkinaseplasticity
AT benjamineturk ancestralresurrectionrevealsevolutionarymechanismsofkinaseplasticity
AT liamjholt ancestralresurrectionrevealsevolutionarymechanismsofkinaseplasticity