Comparing Vector-Borne Disease Surveillance and Response in Beijing and the Netherlands

Background: Climate change, environmental change, and globalization affect the geographical distribution of vector-borne diseases. Temperate regions should be prepared for emerging diseases and learn from each other’s experiences. Objective(s): The vector-borne disease preparedness in two regions, B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlotte Onstwedder, Jerome Lock-Wah-Hoon, Sigrid van Dorp, Marieta Braks, Liselotte van Asten, Yang Zheng, Thomas Krafft, Ying Tong, Wim van der Hoek, Qi-Yong Liu, Eva Pilot, Quanyi Wang, Ewout Fanoy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2022-07-01
Series:Annals of Global Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/3672
_version_ 1811315624362639360
author Charlotte Onstwedder
Jerome Lock-Wah-Hoon
Sigrid van Dorp
Marieta Braks
Liselotte van Asten
Yang Zheng
Thomas Krafft
Ying Tong
Wim van der Hoek
Qi-Yong Liu
Eva Pilot
Quanyi Wang
Ewout Fanoy
author_facet Charlotte Onstwedder
Jerome Lock-Wah-Hoon
Sigrid van Dorp
Marieta Braks
Liselotte van Asten
Yang Zheng
Thomas Krafft
Ying Tong
Wim van der Hoek
Qi-Yong Liu
Eva Pilot
Quanyi Wang
Ewout Fanoy
author_sort Charlotte Onstwedder
collection DOAJ
description Background: Climate change, environmental change, and globalization affect the geographical distribution of vector-borne diseases. Temperate regions should be prepared for emerging diseases and learn from each other’s experiences. Objective(s): The vector-borne disease preparedness in two regions, Beijing and the Netherlands, were compared in order understand their similarities and differences leading to learning points on this complex topic. Methods: A comparative study was performed using interviews with vector-borne disease experts from Beijing and the Netherlands and supplemented by literature. Findings: In Beijing, syndromic surveillance is a priority for the identification of suspected vector-borne disease cases. In the Netherlands, the main surveillance emphasis is on laboratory confirmed vector-borne disease cases. Vector-surveillance at potential points of entry and other high-risk locations is performed according to the International Health Regulation (2005) in both settings. Beijing controls invasive and native mosquitos, which is not the case in the Netherlands. In Beijing, vector surveillance is performed to measure mosquito density around hospitals, this is not observed in the Dutch setting. Health risks posed by ticks are a priority in urban areas in the Netherlands, and the public is educated in self-protection. In contrast, ticks seem to occur less often in Beijing’s urban areas. Conclusions: The vector-borne disease context framework allowed us to compare the vector-borne disease preparedness between Beijing and the Netherlands, despite differences in vector-borne disease challenges. We can learn valuable lessons concerning surveillance and early detection of emerging vector-borne diseases when comparing the preparedness between different regions.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:33:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efdd566aa0c44aae9e91f9a691105d8d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-9996
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:33:33Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Annals of Global Health
spelling doaj.art-efdd566aa0c44aae9e91f9a691105d8d2022-12-22T02:48:30ZengUbiquity PressAnnals of Global Health2214-99962022-07-0188110.5334/aogh.36722769Comparing Vector-Borne Disease Surveillance and Response in Beijing and the NetherlandsCharlotte Onstwedder0Jerome Lock-Wah-Hoon1Sigrid van Dorp2Marieta Braks3Liselotte van Asten4Yang Zheng5Thomas Krafft6Ying Tong7Wim van der Hoek8Qi-Yong Liu9Eva Pilot10Quanyi Wang11Ewout Fanoy12Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht; Centre for Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, BilthovenDepartment of Health, Ethics & Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht; Centre for Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, BilthovenDepartment of Health, Ethics & Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht; Centre for Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, BilthovenCenter for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, BilthovenCentre for Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, BilthovenInstitute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, BeijingDepartment of Health, Ethics & Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, MaastrichtInstitute of Disinfection and Vector Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, BeijingCentre for Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, BilthovenState Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, MaastrichtInstitute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, BeijingPublic Health Service, region Rotterdam-Rijnmond, RotterdamBackground: Climate change, environmental change, and globalization affect the geographical distribution of vector-borne diseases. Temperate regions should be prepared for emerging diseases and learn from each other’s experiences. Objective(s): The vector-borne disease preparedness in two regions, Beijing and the Netherlands, were compared in order understand their similarities and differences leading to learning points on this complex topic. Methods: A comparative study was performed using interviews with vector-borne disease experts from Beijing and the Netherlands and supplemented by literature. Findings: In Beijing, syndromic surveillance is a priority for the identification of suspected vector-borne disease cases. In the Netherlands, the main surveillance emphasis is on laboratory confirmed vector-borne disease cases. Vector-surveillance at potential points of entry and other high-risk locations is performed according to the International Health Regulation (2005) in both settings. Beijing controls invasive and native mosquitos, which is not the case in the Netherlands. In Beijing, vector surveillance is performed to measure mosquito density around hospitals, this is not observed in the Dutch setting. Health risks posed by ticks are a priority in urban areas in the Netherlands, and the public is educated in self-protection. In contrast, ticks seem to occur less often in Beijing’s urban areas. Conclusions: The vector-borne disease context framework allowed us to compare the vector-borne disease preparedness between Beijing and the Netherlands, despite differences in vector-borne disease challenges. We can learn valuable lessons concerning surveillance and early detection of emerging vector-borne diseases when comparing the preparedness between different regions.https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/3672vector-borne diseasespreparednesssurveillanceresponsebeijingthe netherlandsihr
spellingShingle Charlotte Onstwedder
Jerome Lock-Wah-Hoon
Sigrid van Dorp
Marieta Braks
Liselotte van Asten
Yang Zheng
Thomas Krafft
Ying Tong
Wim van der Hoek
Qi-Yong Liu
Eva Pilot
Quanyi Wang
Ewout Fanoy
Comparing Vector-Borne Disease Surveillance and Response in Beijing and the Netherlands
Annals of Global Health
vector-borne diseases
preparedness
surveillance
response
beijing
the netherlands
ihr
title Comparing Vector-Borne Disease Surveillance and Response in Beijing and the Netherlands
title_full Comparing Vector-Borne Disease Surveillance and Response in Beijing and the Netherlands
title_fullStr Comparing Vector-Borne Disease Surveillance and Response in Beijing and the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Vector-Borne Disease Surveillance and Response in Beijing and the Netherlands
title_short Comparing Vector-Borne Disease Surveillance and Response in Beijing and the Netherlands
title_sort comparing vector borne disease surveillance and response in beijing and the netherlands
topic vector-borne diseases
preparedness
surveillance
response
beijing
the netherlands
ihr
url https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/3672
work_keys_str_mv AT charlotteonstwedder comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT jeromelockwahhoon comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT sigridvandorp comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT marietabraks comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT liselottevanasten comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT yangzheng comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT thomaskrafft comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT yingtong comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT wimvanderhoek comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT qiyongliu comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT evapilot comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT quanyiwang comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands
AT ewoutfanoy comparingvectorbornediseasesurveillanceandresponseinbeijingandthenetherlands