A review of serological tests to assist diagnosis of reactive arthritis: critical appraisal on methodologies

On a population-based level, the incidence of reactive arthritis (ReA) is 0.6-27/100,000. The definition of ReA varies and its pathogenesis is not yet clear. Attempts in basic immunology to suggest hypotheses for proliferation of forbidden B cell clones, molecular mimicry and involvement of cross-re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamara eTuuminen, Kari eLounamo, Marjatta eLeirisalo-Repo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fimmu.2013.00418/full
_version_ 1818014567647674368
author Tamara eTuuminen
Tamara eTuuminen
Kari eLounamo
Marjatta eLeirisalo-Repo
author_facet Tamara eTuuminen
Tamara eTuuminen
Kari eLounamo
Marjatta eLeirisalo-Repo
author_sort Tamara eTuuminen
collection DOAJ
description On a population-based level, the incidence of reactive arthritis (ReA) is 0.6-27/100,000. The definition of ReA varies and its pathogenesis is not yet clear. Attempts in basic immunology to suggest hypotheses for proliferation of forbidden B cell clones, molecular mimicry and involvement of cross-reactive antibodies are helpful but not sufficient. Importantly, for the clinical diagnosis of the preceding infection, serology is widely used. Unfortunately, the accuracy of associations between serologic findings and clinical conclusions is plagued by poor standardisation of methods. So far, few attempts have been done to examine the pitfalls of different approaches. Here, we review several serologic techniques, their performance and limitations. We will focus only on serology for Yersinia, Campylobacter, Salmonella and Chlamydia trachomatis because these bacteria have a longer history of being associated with ReA. We also address controversies regarding the role of serology for some other bacteria linked to autoimmune disorders.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T06:46:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efdfad0c5e5f46f2b1783121c8bdc280
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-3224
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T06:46:12Z
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj.art-efdfad0c5e5f46f2b1783121c8bdc2802022-12-22T02:07:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242013-12-01410.3389/fimmu.2013.0041861768A review of serological tests to assist diagnosis of reactive arthritis: critical appraisal on methodologiesTamara eTuuminen0Tamara eTuuminen1Kari eLounamo2Marjatta eLeirisalo-Repo3University of HelsinkiEastern Finland Laboratory Centre Joint Authority EnterpriseHealth Centre of LahtiUniversity of HelsinkiOn a population-based level, the incidence of reactive arthritis (ReA) is 0.6-27/100,000. The definition of ReA varies and its pathogenesis is not yet clear. Attempts in basic immunology to suggest hypotheses for proliferation of forbidden B cell clones, molecular mimicry and involvement of cross-reactive antibodies are helpful but not sufficient. Importantly, for the clinical diagnosis of the preceding infection, serology is widely used. Unfortunately, the accuracy of associations between serologic findings and clinical conclusions is plagued by poor standardisation of methods. So far, few attempts have been done to examine the pitfalls of different approaches. Here, we review several serologic techniques, their performance and limitations. We will focus only on serology for Yersinia, Campylobacter, Salmonella and Chlamydia trachomatis because these bacteria have a longer history of being associated with ReA. We also address controversies regarding the role of serology for some other bacteria linked to autoimmune disorders.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fimmu.2013.00418/fullCampylobacterChlamydia trachomatisSalmonellaSerologyYersiniareactive arthritis
spellingShingle Tamara eTuuminen
Tamara eTuuminen
Kari eLounamo
Marjatta eLeirisalo-Repo
A review of serological tests to assist diagnosis of reactive arthritis: critical appraisal on methodologies
Frontiers in Immunology
Campylobacter
Chlamydia trachomatis
Salmonella
Serology
Yersinia
reactive arthritis
title A review of serological tests to assist diagnosis of reactive arthritis: critical appraisal on methodologies
title_full A review of serological tests to assist diagnosis of reactive arthritis: critical appraisal on methodologies
title_fullStr A review of serological tests to assist diagnosis of reactive arthritis: critical appraisal on methodologies
title_full_unstemmed A review of serological tests to assist diagnosis of reactive arthritis: critical appraisal on methodologies
title_short A review of serological tests to assist diagnosis of reactive arthritis: critical appraisal on methodologies
title_sort review of serological tests to assist diagnosis of reactive arthritis critical appraisal on methodologies
topic Campylobacter
Chlamydia trachomatis
Salmonella
Serology
Yersinia
reactive arthritis
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fimmu.2013.00418/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tamaraetuuminen areviewofserologicalteststoassistdiagnosisofreactivearthritiscriticalappraisalonmethodologies
AT tamaraetuuminen areviewofserologicalteststoassistdiagnosisofreactivearthritiscriticalappraisalonmethodologies
AT karielounamo areviewofserologicalteststoassistdiagnosisofreactivearthritiscriticalappraisalonmethodologies
AT marjattaeleirisalorepo areviewofserologicalteststoassistdiagnosisofreactivearthritiscriticalappraisalonmethodologies
AT tamaraetuuminen reviewofserologicalteststoassistdiagnosisofreactivearthritiscriticalappraisalonmethodologies
AT tamaraetuuminen reviewofserologicalteststoassistdiagnosisofreactivearthritiscriticalappraisalonmethodologies
AT karielounamo reviewofserologicalteststoassistdiagnosisofreactivearthritiscriticalappraisalonmethodologies
AT marjattaeleirisalorepo reviewofserologicalteststoassistdiagnosisofreactivearthritiscriticalappraisalonmethodologies