Thinking about the nucleus

One of the most sacred freedom in the scientific world is the freedom to challenge: to test new ideas against old, established ones, to try and explain facts and results by means of new interpretations, sometimes even to believe the unbelievable. Obviously, a consequence of this freedom to challenge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M Biggiogera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2009-06-01
Series:European Journal of Histochemistry
Online Access:https://www.ejh.it/index.php/ejh/article/view/812
_version_ 1811282300051128320
author M Biggiogera
author_facet M Biggiogera
author_sort M Biggiogera
collection DOAJ
description One of the most sacred freedom in the scientific world is the freedom to challenge: to test new ideas against old, established ones, to try and explain facts and results by means of new interpretations, sometimes even to believe the unbelievable. Obviously, a consequence of this freedom to challenge is the freedom to be challenged, i.e. any new, earth-shaking theory can be challenged by other scientists. During the summer of 2001, a paper published by Iborra et al. (2001) pushed the scientific community to rethink about one of the basic mechanisms of cell biology: translation. According to this paper, mRNA could be translated, although in a limited amount, also in the nucleus. Other papers confirming these data were soon published and these findings were more or less quietly accepted. However, in January 2003, two papers (Dahlberg et al., 2003; Nathanson et al., 2003) repeated carefully the experiments of Iborra and coworkers and concluded that there was no proof of nuclear translation. In this way, we are restored to our previous dogma of nuclear transcription and cytoplasmic translation.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T01:50:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efdffe5a854546ac974260bde970e9f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1121-760X
2038-8306
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T01:50:08Z
publishDate 2009-06-01
publisher PAGEPress Publications
record_format Article
series European Journal of Histochemistry
spelling doaj.art-efdffe5a854546ac974260bde970e9f82022-12-22T03:07:55ZengPAGEPress PublicationsEuropean Journal of Histochemistry1121-760X2038-83062009-06-0147110.4081/812546Thinking about the nucleusM BiggiogeraOne of the most sacred freedom in the scientific world is the freedom to challenge: to test new ideas against old, established ones, to try and explain facts and results by means of new interpretations, sometimes even to believe the unbelievable. Obviously, a consequence of this freedom to challenge is the freedom to be challenged, i.e. any new, earth-shaking theory can be challenged by other scientists. During the summer of 2001, a paper published by Iborra et al. (2001) pushed the scientific community to rethink about one of the basic mechanisms of cell biology: translation. According to this paper, mRNA could be translated, although in a limited amount, also in the nucleus. Other papers confirming these data were soon published and these findings were more or less quietly accepted. However, in January 2003, two papers (Dahlberg et al., 2003; Nathanson et al., 2003) repeated carefully the experiments of Iborra and coworkers and concluded that there was no proof of nuclear translation. In this way, we are restored to our previous dogma of nuclear transcription and cytoplasmic translation.https://www.ejh.it/index.php/ejh/article/view/812
spellingShingle M Biggiogera
Thinking about the nucleus
European Journal of Histochemistry
title Thinking about the nucleus
title_full Thinking about the nucleus
title_fullStr Thinking about the nucleus
title_full_unstemmed Thinking about the nucleus
title_short Thinking about the nucleus
title_sort thinking about the nucleus
url https://www.ejh.it/index.php/ejh/article/view/812
work_keys_str_mv AT mbiggiogera thinkingaboutthenucleus