A CFD Study of Roadside Barrier Impact on the Dispersion of Road Air Pollution

This study evaluated road shape and roadside barrier impact on near-road air pollution dispersion using FLUENT computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model. Simulated road shapes are three types, namely at-grade, depressed, and filled road. The realizable k-ε model in FLUENT CFD code was used to simulat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sang Jin Jeong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2015-03-01
Series:Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://asianjae.org/_common/do.php?a=full&b=11&bidx=1540&aidx=19504
_version_ 1797765581449986048
author Sang Jin Jeong
author_facet Sang Jin Jeong
author_sort Sang Jin Jeong
collection DOAJ
description This study evaluated road shape and roadside barrier impact on near-road air pollution dispersion using FLUENT computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model. Simulated road shapes are three types, namely at-grade, depressed, and filled road. The realizable k-ε model in FLUENT CFD code was used to simulate the flow and dispersion around road. The selected concentration profile results were compared with the wind tunnel experiments. The overall concentration profile results show good agreement with the wind tunnel results. The results showed that noise barriers, which positioned around the at-grade road, decrease the horizontal impact distance (In this study, the impact distance was defined as the distance from road surface origin coordinate to the position whose mass fraction is 0.1.) lower 0.33~0.65 times and change the vertical air pollution impact distance larger 2.0~2.27 times than those of no barrier case. In case of filled road, noise barriers decrease the horizontal impact distance lower 0.24~0.65 times and change the vertical air pollution impact distance larger 3.33~3.55 times than those of no barrier case. The depressed road increase 1.53~1.68 times the vertical air pollution impact distance. It contributes the decrease of horizontal air pollution impact distance 0.32~0.60 times compare with no barrier case.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:12:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efea8a969a7b4ba1895fe0967a6ca7d2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1976-6912
2287-1160
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:12:09Z
publishDate 2015-03-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
spelling doaj.art-efea8a969a7b4ba1895fe0967a6ca7d22023-08-02T01:40:51ZengSpringerAsian Journal of Atmospheric Environment1976-69122287-11602015-03-0191223010.5572/ajae.2015.9.1.022A CFD Study of Roadside Barrier Impact on the Dispersion of Road Air PollutionSang Jin Jeong0Department of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 442-760, KoreaThis study evaluated road shape and roadside barrier impact on near-road air pollution dispersion using FLUENT computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model. Simulated road shapes are three types, namely at-grade, depressed, and filled road. The realizable k-ε model in FLUENT CFD code was used to simulate the flow and dispersion around road. The selected concentration profile results were compared with the wind tunnel experiments. The overall concentration profile results show good agreement with the wind tunnel results. The results showed that noise barriers, which positioned around the at-grade road, decrease the horizontal impact distance (In this study, the impact distance was defined as the distance from road surface origin coordinate to the position whose mass fraction is 0.1.) lower 0.33~0.65 times and change the vertical air pollution impact distance larger 2.0~2.27 times than those of no barrier case. In case of filled road, noise barriers decrease the horizontal impact distance lower 0.24~0.65 times and change the vertical air pollution impact distance larger 3.33~3.55 times than those of no barrier case. The depressed road increase 1.53~1.68 times the vertical air pollution impact distance. It contributes the decrease of horizontal air pollution impact distance 0.32~0.60 times compare with no barrier case.http://asianjae.org/_common/do.php?a=full&b=11&bidx=1540&aidx=19504cfd modelroad shapenoise barrierroad emissionair pollution dispersion
spellingShingle Sang Jin Jeong
A CFD Study of Roadside Barrier Impact on the Dispersion of Road Air Pollution
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
cfd model
road shape
noise barrier
road emission
air pollution dispersion
title A CFD Study of Roadside Barrier Impact on the Dispersion of Road Air Pollution
title_full A CFD Study of Roadside Barrier Impact on the Dispersion of Road Air Pollution
title_fullStr A CFD Study of Roadside Barrier Impact on the Dispersion of Road Air Pollution
title_full_unstemmed A CFD Study of Roadside Barrier Impact on the Dispersion of Road Air Pollution
title_short A CFD Study of Roadside Barrier Impact on the Dispersion of Road Air Pollution
title_sort cfd study of roadside barrier impact on the dispersion of road air pollution
topic cfd model
road shape
noise barrier
road emission
air pollution dispersion
url http://asianjae.org/_common/do.php?a=full&b=11&bidx=1540&aidx=19504
work_keys_str_mv AT sangjinjeong acfdstudyofroadsidebarrierimpactonthedispersionofroadairpollution
AT sangjinjeong cfdstudyofroadsidebarrierimpactonthedispersionofroadairpollution