Effectiveness of a digital intervention versus alcohol information for online help-seekers in Sweden: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background The ubiquity of Internet connectivity, and widespread unmet needs, requires investigations of digital interventions for people seeking help with their drinking. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of a digital alcohol intervention compared to existing online...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcus Bendtsen, Katarina Åsberg, Jim McCambridge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-05-01
Series:BMC Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02374-5
_version_ 1811250882582413312
author Marcus Bendtsen
Katarina Åsberg
Jim McCambridge
author_facet Marcus Bendtsen
Katarina Åsberg
Jim McCambridge
author_sort Marcus Bendtsen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The ubiquity of Internet connectivity, and widespread unmet needs, requires investigations of digital interventions for people seeking help with their drinking. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of a digital alcohol intervention compared to existing online resources for help seekers. Methods This parallel randomised controlled trial included 2129 risky drinkers with access to a mobile phone and aged 18 years or older. Randomised sub-studies investigated consent procedures and control group design. Simple computerised randomisation was used. Participants were aware of allocation after randomisation; research personnel were not. The digital intervention was designed around weekly monitoring of alcohol consumption followed by feedback and tools for behaviour change. Primary outcomes were total weekly consumption (TWC) and frequency of heavy episodic drinking (HED), measured 2 and 4 months post-randomisation. Results Between 25/04/2019 and 26/11/2020, 2129 participants were randomised (intervention: 1063, control: 1066). Negative binomial regression was used to contrast groups, with both Bayesian and maximum likelihood inference. The posterior median incidence rate ratio (IRR) of TWC was 0.89 (95% CI = 0.81;0.99, 98.2% probability of effect, P-value = 0.033) at 2 months among 1557 participants and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.69;0.86, > 99.9% probability of effect, P-value < 0.001) at 4 months among 1429 participants. For HED, the IRR was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.75;0.93, > 99.9% probability of effect, P-value = 0.0009) at 2 months among 1548 participants and 0.71 (95% CI = 0.63;0.79, probability of effect > 99.9%, P-value < 0.0001) at 4 months among 1424 participants. Analyses with imputed data were not markedly different. Conclusions A digital alcohol intervention produced self-reported behaviour change among online help seekers in the general population. The internal and external validity of this trial is strong, subject to carefully considered study limitations arguably inherent to trials of this nature. Limitations include higher than anticipated attrition to follow-up and lack of blinding. Trial registration The trial was prospectively registered ( ISRCTN48317451 ).
first_indexed 2024-04-12T16:11:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eff2c45d714f4aa5bb169fd0f434827a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1741-7015
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T16:11:22Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medicine
spelling doaj.art-eff2c45d714f4aa5bb169fd0f434827a2022-12-22T03:25:54ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152022-05-0120111310.1186/s12916-022-02374-5Effectiveness of a digital intervention versus alcohol information for online help-seekers in Sweden: a randomised controlled trialMarcus Bendtsen0Katarina Åsberg1Jim McCambridge2Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Society and Health, Linköping UniversityDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Society and Health, Linköping UniversityDepartment of Health Sciences, University of YorkAbstract Background The ubiquity of Internet connectivity, and widespread unmet needs, requires investigations of digital interventions for people seeking help with their drinking. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of a digital alcohol intervention compared to existing online resources for help seekers. Methods This parallel randomised controlled trial included 2129 risky drinkers with access to a mobile phone and aged 18 years or older. Randomised sub-studies investigated consent procedures and control group design. Simple computerised randomisation was used. Participants were aware of allocation after randomisation; research personnel were not. The digital intervention was designed around weekly monitoring of alcohol consumption followed by feedback and tools for behaviour change. Primary outcomes were total weekly consumption (TWC) and frequency of heavy episodic drinking (HED), measured 2 and 4 months post-randomisation. Results Between 25/04/2019 and 26/11/2020, 2129 participants were randomised (intervention: 1063, control: 1066). Negative binomial regression was used to contrast groups, with both Bayesian and maximum likelihood inference. The posterior median incidence rate ratio (IRR) of TWC was 0.89 (95% CI = 0.81;0.99, 98.2% probability of effect, P-value = 0.033) at 2 months among 1557 participants and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.69;0.86, > 99.9% probability of effect, P-value < 0.001) at 4 months among 1429 participants. For HED, the IRR was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.75;0.93, > 99.9% probability of effect, P-value = 0.0009) at 2 months among 1548 participants and 0.71 (95% CI = 0.63;0.79, probability of effect > 99.9%, P-value < 0.0001) at 4 months among 1424 participants. Analyses with imputed data were not markedly different. Conclusions A digital alcohol intervention produced self-reported behaviour change among online help seekers in the general population. The internal and external validity of this trial is strong, subject to carefully considered study limitations arguably inherent to trials of this nature. Limitations include higher than anticipated attrition to follow-up and lack of blinding. Trial registration The trial was prospectively registered ( ISRCTN48317451 ).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02374-5Brief alcohol interventionDigital behaviour change interventionPublic healthTelemedicineRandomised controlled trial
spellingShingle Marcus Bendtsen
Katarina Åsberg
Jim McCambridge
Effectiveness of a digital intervention versus alcohol information for online help-seekers in Sweden: a randomised controlled trial
BMC Medicine
Brief alcohol intervention
Digital behaviour change intervention
Public health
Telemedicine
Randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness of a digital intervention versus alcohol information for online help-seekers in Sweden: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of a digital intervention versus alcohol information for online help-seekers in Sweden: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a digital intervention versus alcohol information for online help-seekers in Sweden: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a digital intervention versus alcohol information for online help-seekers in Sweden: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of a digital intervention versus alcohol information for online help-seekers in Sweden: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of a digital intervention versus alcohol information for online help seekers in sweden a randomised controlled trial
topic Brief alcohol intervention
Digital behaviour change intervention
Public health
Telemedicine
Randomised controlled trial
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02374-5
work_keys_str_mv AT marcusbendtsen effectivenessofadigitalinterventionversusalcoholinformationforonlinehelpseekersinswedenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT katarinaasberg effectivenessofadigitalinterventionversusalcoholinformationforonlinehelpseekersinswedenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jimmccambridge effectivenessofadigitalinterventionversusalcoholinformationforonlinehelpseekersinswedenarandomisedcontrolledtrial