Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269

Purpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucila Coca Leventhal, Kristiane Santos Ferreira Barbosa
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade de Fortaleza 2012-01-01
Series:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.unifor.br/index.php/RBPS/article/view/571
_version_ 1818529780686913536
author Lucila Coca Leventhal
Kristiane Santos Ferreira Barbosa
author_facet Lucila Coca Leventhal
Kristiane Santos Ferreira Barbosa
author_sort Lucila Coca Leventhal
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive study, held on two hospitals from the city of São Paulo. The data collection occurred in August, 2004, by means of a questionnaire applied to all women at postpartum period of each hospital (83 from PuH and 88 from PrU), comprising 171 interviewed. Statistical analysis was done by absolute frequencies and percentages. Results: Most of the interviewed women from PuH (69.9%; n=58) did not plan their pregnancy, while 83.0% (n=73) of those from PrH did so. The contraceptive methods that mostly caused failure were the pill (27.6%; n=16) and the condom (12.1%; n=7) at PuH; and the Ogino- Knaus method [rhythm method of contraception] (26.6%; n=4) and the pill (13.3%; n=2) at PrH. Conclusions: Pregnancy planning was done by most of the women from PrH; the same not occurring for women from PuH. The contraceptive pill and the condom, at PuH, and the rhythm method and the pill, at PrH, were the contraceptive methods that mostly failed. The accomplishment and disclosure of family planning programs for more deprived people is needed, as well as to favor them easy access to contraceptive methods.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T17:11:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efff74d476cf4663a927944d6243e52c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1806-1222
1806-1230
language Portuguese
last_indexed 2024-12-11T17:11:19Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Universidade de Fortaleza
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
spelling doaj.art-efff74d476cf4663a927944d6243e52c2022-12-22T00:57:31ZporUniversidade de FortalezaRevista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde1806-12221806-12302012-01-0121426927410.5020/5712530Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269Lucila Coca Leventhal0Kristiane Santos Ferreira Barbosa1Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São Paulo - USPnstituto do Coração - SPPurpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive study, held on two hospitals from the city of São Paulo. The data collection occurred in August, 2004, by means of a questionnaire applied to all women at postpartum period of each hospital (83 from PuH and 88 from PrU), comprising 171 interviewed. Statistical analysis was done by absolute frequencies and percentages. Results: Most of the interviewed women from PuH (69.9%; n=58) did not plan their pregnancy, while 83.0% (n=73) of those from PrH did so. The contraceptive methods that mostly caused failure were the pill (27.6%; n=16) and the condom (12.1%; n=7) at PuH; and the Ogino- Knaus method [rhythm method of contraception] (26.6%; n=4) and the pill (13.3%; n=2) at PrH. Conclusions: Pregnancy planning was done by most of the women from PrH; the same not occurring for women from PuH. The contraceptive pill and the condom, at PuH, and the rhythm method and the pill, at PrH, were the contraceptive methods that mostly failed. The accomplishment and disclosure of family planning programs for more deprived people is needed, as well as to favor them easy access to contraceptive methods.http://ojs.unifor.br/index.php/RBPS/article/view/571Planejamento FamiliarAnticoncepçãoSaúde da Mulher.
spellingShingle Lucila Coca Leventhal
Kristiane Santos Ferreira Barbosa
Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
Planejamento Familiar
Anticoncepção
Saúde da Mulher.
title Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
title_full Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
title_fullStr Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
title_short Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
title_sort pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital doi 10 5020 18061230 2008 p269
topic Planejamento Familiar
Anticoncepção
Saúde da Mulher.
url http://ojs.unifor.br/index.php/RBPS/article/view/571
work_keys_str_mv AT lucilacocaleventhal pregnancyplanningamongwomenatpostpartumperiodinapublicandaprivatehospitaldoi105020180612302008p269
AT kristianesantosferreirabarbosa pregnancyplanningamongwomenatpostpartumperiodinapublicandaprivatehospitaldoi105020180612302008p269