Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
Purpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive stu...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Universidade de Fortaleza
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ojs.unifor.br/index.php/RBPS/article/view/571 |
_version_ | 1818529780686913536 |
---|---|
author | Lucila Coca Leventhal Kristiane Santos Ferreira Barbosa |
author_facet | Lucila Coca Leventhal Kristiane Santos Ferreira Barbosa |
author_sort | Lucila Coca Leventhal |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive study, held on two hospitals from the city of São Paulo. The data collection occurred in August, 2004, by means of a questionnaire applied to all women at postpartum period of each hospital (83 from PuH and 88 from PrU), comprising 171 interviewed. Statistical analysis was done by absolute frequencies and percentages. Results: Most of the interviewed women from PuH (69.9%; n=58) did not plan their pregnancy, while 83.0% (n=73) of those from PrH did so. The contraceptive methods that mostly caused failure were the pill (27.6%; n=16) and the condom (12.1%; n=7) at PuH; and the Ogino- Knaus method [rhythm method of contraception] (26.6%; n=4) and the pill (13.3%; n=2) at PrH. Conclusions: Pregnancy planning was done by most of the women from PrH; the same not occurring for women from PuH. The contraceptive pill and the condom, at PuH, and the rhythm method and the pill, at PrH, were the contraceptive methods that mostly failed. The accomplishment and disclosure of family planning programs for more deprived people is needed, as well as to favor them easy access to contraceptive methods. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T17:11:19Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-efff74d476cf4663a927944d6243e52c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1806-1222 1806-1230 |
language | Portuguese |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T17:11:19Z |
publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
publisher | Universidade de Fortaleza |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
spelling | doaj.art-efff74d476cf4663a927944d6243e52c2022-12-22T00:57:31ZporUniversidade de FortalezaRevista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde1806-12221806-12302012-01-0121426927410.5020/5712530Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269Lucila Coca Leventhal0Kristiane Santos Ferreira Barbosa1Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São Paulo - USPnstituto do Coração - SPPurpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive study, held on two hospitals from the city of São Paulo. The data collection occurred in August, 2004, by means of a questionnaire applied to all women at postpartum period of each hospital (83 from PuH and 88 from PrU), comprising 171 interviewed. Statistical analysis was done by absolute frequencies and percentages. Results: Most of the interviewed women from PuH (69.9%; n=58) did not plan their pregnancy, while 83.0% (n=73) of those from PrH did so. The contraceptive methods that mostly caused failure were the pill (27.6%; n=16) and the condom (12.1%; n=7) at PuH; and the Ogino- Knaus method [rhythm method of contraception] (26.6%; n=4) and the pill (13.3%; n=2) at PrH. Conclusions: Pregnancy planning was done by most of the women from PrH; the same not occurring for women from PuH. The contraceptive pill and the condom, at PuH, and the rhythm method and the pill, at PrH, were the contraceptive methods that mostly failed. The accomplishment and disclosure of family planning programs for more deprived people is needed, as well as to favor them easy access to contraceptive methods.http://ojs.unifor.br/index.php/RBPS/article/view/571Planejamento FamiliarAnticoncepçãoSaúde da Mulher. |
spellingShingle | Lucila Coca Leventhal Kristiane Santos Ferreira Barbosa Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde Planejamento Familiar Anticoncepção Saúde da Mulher. |
title | Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
title_full | Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
title_fullStr | Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
title_full_unstemmed | Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
title_short | Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
title_sort | pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital doi 10 5020 18061230 2008 p269 |
topic | Planejamento Familiar Anticoncepção Saúde da Mulher. |
url | http://ojs.unifor.br/index.php/RBPS/article/view/571 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucilacocaleventhal pregnancyplanningamongwomenatpostpartumperiodinapublicandaprivatehospitaldoi105020180612302008p269 AT kristianesantosferreirabarbosa pregnancyplanningamongwomenatpostpartumperiodinapublicandaprivatehospitaldoi105020180612302008p269 |