The ecological significance of extremely large flocks of birds

Abstract Population size is generally limited by resource availability during and outside the breeding season. Therefore, maximum size of flocks may provide important information on population regulation and the influence of diet and trophic level on maximal degree of sociality. We hypothesized that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anders Pape Møller, Karsten Laursen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-06-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5234
_version_ 1818946212405968896
author Anders Pape Møller
Karsten Laursen
author_facet Anders Pape Møller
Karsten Laursen
author_sort Anders Pape Møller
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Population size is generally limited by resource availability during and outside the breeding season. Therefore, maximum size of flocks may provide important information on population regulation and the influence of diet and trophic level on maximal degree of sociality. We hypothesized that (a) flock size should increase with nutrient availability; (b) flock size should decrease with latitude because productivity is higher at lower latitude; (c) aquatic habitats should have larger flocks than terrestrial habitats because the former are less accessible; (d) smaller species should have larger flocks because they require overall less food; (e) human‐impacted species that live in perturbed habitats should have smaller flocks than other species; (f) flock size should decrease with increasing trophic level because there is a reduction in biomass due to conversion at each trophic level; and (g) flocks of species depending on ancestral landscapes should have decreased in size in recent years due to human impact (e.g., land‐use). We obtained 1564 observations of flocks that exceeded 100,000 individuals in order to test the predictions listed above. Most effect sizes were small to medium accounting for 1%–9% of the variance, while large effects accounting for 25% or more were only found for total nitrogen used per km2 and area used for agriculture. Changes in large bird flocks were caused by habitat degradation and persecution, and temporal decline in size of large flocks revealed changes in nutrient use, reductions in nutrient cycling, and changes in flock size linked to trophic level.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T08:11:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f007a7fb84d34c65bd22e6919534fb23
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T08:11:25Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-f007a7fb84d34c65bd22e6919534fb232022-12-21T19:47:15ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582019-06-019116559656710.1002/ece3.5234The ecological significance of extremely large flocks of birdsAnders Pape Møller0Karsten Laursen1Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris‐Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech Université Paris‐Saclay Orsay Cedex FranceDepartment of Bioscience Aarhus University Rønde DenmarkAbstract Population size is generally limited by resource availability during and outside the breeding season. Therefore, maximum size of flocks may provide important information on population regulation and the influence of diet and trophic level on maximal degree of sociality. We hypothesized that (a) flock size should increase with nutrient availability; (b) flock size should decrease with latitude because productivity is higher at lower latitude; (c) aquatic habitats should have larger flocks than terrestrial habitats because the former are less accessible; (d) smaller species should have larger flocks because they require overall less food; (e) human‐impacted species that live in perturbed habitats should have smaller flocks than other species; (f) flock size should decrease with increasing trophic level because there is a reduction in biomass due to conversion at each trophic level; and (g) flocks of species depending on ancestral landscapes should have decreased in size in recent years due to human impact (e.g., land‐use). We obtained 1564 observations of flocks that exceeded 100,000 individuals in order to test the predictions listed above. Most effect sizes were small to medium accounting for 1%–9% of the variance, while large effects accounting for 25% or more were only found for total nitrogen used per km2 and area used for agriculture. Changes in large bird flocks were caused by habitat degradation and persecution, and temporal decline in size of large flocks revealed changes in nutrient use, reductions in nutrient cycling, and changes in flock size linked to trophic level.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5234largest colonieslargest flocksnutrient limitationpopulation regulationresource limitationtrophic level
spellingShingle Anders Pape Møller
Karsten Laursen
The ecological significance of extremely large flocks of birds
Ecology and Evolution
largest colonies
largest flocks
nutrient limitation
population regulation
resource limitation
trophic level
title The ecological significance of extremely large flocks of birds
title_full The ecological significance of extremely large flocks of birds
title_fullStr The ecological significance of extremely large flocks of birds
title_full_unstemmed The ecological significance of extremely large flocks of birds
title_short The ecological significance of extremely large flocks of birds
title_sort ecological significance of extremely large flocks of birds
topic largest colonies
largest flocks
nutrient limitation
population regulation
resource limitation
trophic level
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5234
work_keys_str_mv AT anderspapemøller theecologicalsignificanceofextremelylargeflocksofbirds
AT karstenlaursen theecologicalsignificanceofextremelylargeflocksofbirds
AT anderspapemøller ecologicalsignificanceofextremelylargeflocksofbirds
AT karstenlaursen ecologicalsignificanceofextremelylargeflocksofbirds