Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and the utility of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen lateral immunochromatography assay

Background: Helicobacter pylori causes the most common human gastric infection. H. pylori Stool Antigen Lateral Flow Immunochromatography assay (HpSA-LFIA) is considered one of the most cost-effective and rapid non-invasive assays (active tests). Evaluating HpSA-LFIA is of crucial for ensuring accur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaymaa Abdelmalek, Wafy Hamed, Neven Nagy, Karim Shokry, Hisham Abdelrahman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-03-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844022004777
_version_ 1818327836417589248
author Shaymaa Abdelmalek
Wafy Hamed
Neven Nagy
Karim Shokry
Hisham Abdelrahman
author_facet Shaymaa Abdelmalek
Wafy Hamed
Neven Nagy
Karim Shokry
Hisham Abdelrahman
author_sort Shaymaa Abdelmalek
collection DOAJ
description Background: Helicobacter pylori causes the most common human gastric infection. H. pylori Stool Antigen Lateral Flow Immunochromatography assay (HpSA-LFIA) is considered one of the most cost-effective and rapid non-invasive assays (active tests). Evaluating HpSA-LFIA is of crucial for ensuring accuracy and utility assurance. This study aimed to evaluate the polyclonal antibody-based HpSA-LFIA in comparison to a monoclonal antibody-based ELISA kit. Methodology: Stool samples were collected from 200 gastric patients for HpSA-LFIA and semiquantitative HpSA-ELISA tests. A statistical analysis of the diagnostic performance was performed using MedCalc software. Chi-square tests were performed to determine the effects of gender and age. Results and conclusion: The results showed that HpSA-LFIA achieved remarkable sensitivity (93.75%) and NPV (98.00%). However, it had poor specificity, PPV, and accuracy of 59.76%, 31.25%, and 65.31%, respectively. LR+ and LR-were 2.33% & 0.1%, respectively. Gender didn't affect the diagnostic performance of HpSA-LFIA. Age groups had irrelevant sensitivity; however, specificity was significantly higher in patients aged >45 years. We can conclude that HpSA-LFIA was not accurate enough to be the sole test for diagnosis and suggest developing other confirmatory tests in case of positive conditions.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T12:22:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f00b42fb67404f379949747e2d861993
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T12:22:36Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-f00b42fb67404f379949747e2d8619932022-12-21T23:46:33ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402022-03-0183e09189Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and the utility of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen lateral immunochromatography assayShaymaa Abdelmalek0Wafy Hamed1Neven Nagy2Karim Shokry3Hisham Abdelrahman4Microbiology, Immunology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt; Corresponding author.Microbiology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sadat City University, Sadat City, EgyptMicrobiology, Immunology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, EgyptMicrobiology, Immunology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, EgyptDepartment of Veterinary Hygiene and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, EgyptBackground: Helicobacter pylori causes the most common human gastric infection. H. pylori Stool Antigen Lateral Flow Immunochromatography assay (HpSA-LFIA) is considered one of the most cost-effective and rapid non-invasive assays (active tests). Evaluating HpSA-LFIA is of crucial for ensuring accuracy and utility assurance. This study aimed to evaluate the polyclonal antibody-based HpSA-LFIA in comparison to a monoclonal antibody-based ELISA kit. Methodology: Stool samples were collected from 200 gastric patients for HpSA-LFIA and semiquantitative HpSA-ELISA tests. A statistical analysis of the diagnostic performance was performed using MedCalc software. Chi-square tests were performed to determine the effects of gender and age. Results and conclusion: The results showed that HpSA-LFIA achieved remarkable sensitivity (93.75%) and NPV (98.00%). However, it had poor specificity, PPV, and accuracy of 59.76%, 31.25%, and 65.31%, respectively. LR+ and LR-were 2.33% & 0.1%, respectively. Gender didn't affect the diagnostic performance of HpSA-LFIA. Age groups had irrelevant sensitivity; however, specificity was significantly higher in patients aged >45 years. We can conclude that HpSA-LFIA was not accurate enough to be the sole test for diagnosis and suggest developing other confirmatory tests in case of positive conditions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844022004777HpSAH. pyloriDiagnostic performanceSensitivitySpecificityAccuracy
spellingShingle Shaymaa Abdelmalek
Wafy Hamed
Neven Nagy
Karim Shokry
Hisham Abdelrahman
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and the utility of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen lateral immunochromatography assay
Heliyon
HpSA
H. pylori
Diagnostic performance
Sensitivity
Specificity
Accuracy
title Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and the utility of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen lateral immunochromatography assay
title_full Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and the utility of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen lateral immunochromatography assay
title_fullStr Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and the utility of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen lateral immunochromatography assay
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and the utility of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen lateral immunochromatography assay
title_short Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and the utility of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen lateral immunochromatography assay
title_sort evaluation of the diagnostic performance and the utility of helicobacter pylori stool antigen lateral immunochromatography assay
topic HpSA
H. pylori
Diagnostic performance
Sensitivity
Specificity
Accuracy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844022004777
work_keys_str_mv AT shaymaaabdelmalek evaluationofthediagnosticperformanceandtheutilityofhelicobacterpyloristoolantigenlateralimmunochromatographyassay
AT wafyhamed evaluationofthediagnosticperformanceandtheutilityofhelicobacterpyloristoolantigenlateralimmunochromatographyassay
AT nevennagy evaluationofthediagnosticperformanceandtheutilityofhelicobacterpyloristoolantigenlateralimmunochromatographyassay
AT karimshokry evaluationofthediagnosticperformanceandtheutilityofhelicobacterpyloristoolantigenlateralimmunochromatographyassay
AT hishamabdelrahman evaluationofthediagnosticperformanceandtheutilityofhelicobacterpyloristoolantigenlateralimmunochromatographyassay