The influence of pin material and coatings on the incidence of pin site infection after external fixation

Introduction: External fixation is used for a wide variety of surgical treatments. The transcutaneous pins used in external fixation, however, provide a route for bacterial migration from the external to subcutaneous space, and high rates of pin site infection have been reported. The material of whi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samson Arveladze, Fintan Moriarty, Toby Jennison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Limb Lengthening & Reconstruction
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jlimblengthrecon.org/article.asp?issn=2455-3719;year=2022;volume=8;issue=3;spage=16;epage=23;aulast=Arveladze
_version_ 1811220635589804032
author Samson Arveladze
Fintan Moriarty
Toby Jennison
author_facet Samson Arveladze
Fintan Moriarty
Toby Jennison
author_sort Samson Arveladze
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: External fixation is used for a wide variety of surgical treatments. The transcutaneous pins used in external fixation, however, provide a route for bacterial migration from the external to subcutaneous space, and high rates of pin site infection have been reported. The material of which the pin is composed, or any surface coating that is applied, may significantly influence tissue integration and pin site infection. However, clinical data are scarce. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the clinical evidence for the role of pin material, and surface coatings, on the incidence of infection at external fixator pin sites. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed following registration with PROSPERO. A search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were (1) recorded diagnosis of infection, (2) involved external fixation, (3) any bone, (4) English language, (5) human subjects, (5) pin material known, and (6) all levels of evidence. All stages of the review process were performed by two independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model meta-analysis to produce odds ratios. Study bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool Rob II. Strength of evidence was based on the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons methodology for defining the strength of recommendation. Results: After exclusion, 8 studies were further analyzed. One study compared stainless steel and titanium with an odds ratio of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.70–2.70). Three studies compared stainless steel to hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated pins with an odds ratio of 0.25 (95% CI: −0.52–1.02). Two studies analyzed titanium compared to HA-coated pins with an odds ratio of 1.12 (95% CI: −4.25–6.48). Two studies analyzed silver compared to stainless steel with an odds ratio of 0.12 (95% CI: −0.89–1.12). However, the strength of evidence was limited for all studies. Overall, 0 studies had a low risk of bias, 4 studies had an unknown risk of bias, and 4 studies had a high risk of bias. Conclusion: There is currently limited evidence of the effect of different pin material or coatings on the incidence of pin site infection, with the available studies showing contrasting results. Further high-quality and adequately powered studies are required to provide definitive guidance.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:45:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f01cec7a402940089f8d4f7d160bcfec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2455-3719
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:45:03Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Limb Lengthening & Reconstruction
spelling doaj.art-f01cec7a402940089f8d4f7d160bcfec2022-12-22T03:41:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Limb Lengthening & Reconstruction2455-37192022-01-0183162310.4103/jllr.jllr_35_21The influence of pin material and coatings on the incidence of pin site infection after external fixationSamson ArveladzeFintan MoriartyToby JennisonIntroduction: External fixation is used for a wide variety of surgical treatments. The transcutaneous pins used in external fixation, however, provide a route for bacterial migration from the external to subcutaneous space, and high rates of pin site infection have been reported. The material of which the pin is composed, or any surface coating that is applied, may significantly influence tissue integration and pin site infection. However, clinical data are scarce. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the clinical evidence for the role of pin material, and surface coatings, on the incidence of infection at external fixator pin sites. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed following registration with PROSPERO. A search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were (1) recorded diagnosis of infection, (2) involved external fixation, (3) any bone, (4) English language, (5) human subjects, (5) pin material known, and (6) all levels of evidence. All stages of the review process were performed by two independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model meta-analysis to produce odds ratios. Study bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool Rob II. Strength of evidence was based on the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons methodology for defining the strength of recommendation. Results: After exclusion, 8 studies were further analyzed. One study compared stainless steel and titanium with an odds ratio of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.70–2.70). Three studies compared stainless steel to hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated pins with an odds ratio of 0.25 (95% CI: −0.52–1.02). Two studies analyzed titanium compared to HA-coated pins with an odds ratio of 1.12 (95% CI: −4.25–6.48). Two studies analyzed silver compared to stainless steel with an odds ratio of 0.12 (95% CI: −0.89–1.12). However, the strength of evidence was limited for all studies. Overall, 0 studies had a low risk of bias, 4 studies had an unknown risk of bias, and 4 studies had a high risk of bias. Conclusion: There is currently limited evidence of the effect of different pin material or coatings on the incidence of pin site infection, with the available studies showing contrasting results. Further high-quality and adequately powered studies are required to provide definitive guidance.http://www.jlimblengthrecon.org/article.asp?issn=2455-3719;year=2022;volume=8;issue=3;spage=16;epage=23;aulast=Arveladzeexternal fixationhydroxyapatiteinfectionpin tractsilverstainless steeltitanium
spellingShingle Samson Arveladze
Fintan Moriarty
Toby Jennison
The influence of pin material and coatings on the incidence of pin site infection after external fixation
Journal of Limb Lengthening & Reconstruction
external fixation
hydroxyapatite
infection
pin tract
silver
stainless steel
titanium
title The influence of pin material and coatings on the incidence of pin site infection after external fixation
title_full The influence of pin material and coatings on the incidence of pin site infection after external fixation
title_fullStr The influence of pin material and coatings on the incidence of pin site infection after external fixation
title_full_unstemmed The influence of pin material and coatings on the incidence of pin site infection after external fixation
title_short The influence of pin material and coatings on the incidence of pin site infection after external fixation
title_sort influence of pin material and coatings on the incidence of pin site infection after external fixation
topic external fixation
hydroxyapatite
infection
pin tract
silver
stainless steel
titanium
url http://www.jlimblengthrecon.org/article.asp?issn=2455-3719;year=2022;volume=8;issue=3;spage=16;epage=23;aulast=Arveladze
work_keys_str_mv AT samsonarveladze theinfluenceofpinmaterialandcoatingsontheincidenceofpinsiteinfectionafterexternalfixation
AT fintanmoriarty theinfluenceofpinmaterialandcoatingsontheincidenceofpinsiteinfectionafterexternalfixation
AT tobyjennison theinfluenceofpinmaterialandcoatingsontheincidenceofpinsiteinfectionafterexternalfixation
AT samsonarveladze influenceofpinmaterialandcoatingsontheincidenceofpinsiteinfectionafterexternalfixation
AT fintanmoriarty influenceofpinmaterialandcoatingsontheincidenceofpinsiteinfectionafterexternalfixation
AT tobyjennison influenceofpinmaterialandcoatingsontheincidenceofpinsiteinfectionafterexternalfixation