Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva
<span>This article examines three comparative dimensions which need to be examined by anthropology of law with due prudence: the dimension of jurisprudence and anthropology, the dimension of legal systems and their structure, and the dimension of justice. These dimensions are confronted with r...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | ces |
Published: |
AntropoWeb
2011-12-01
|
Series: | AntropoWebzin |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://antropologie.zcu.cz/webzin/index.php/webzin/article/view/54 |
_version_ | 1817969778355077120 |
---|---|
author | Tomáš Ledvinka |
author_facet | Tomáš Ledvinka |
author_sort | Tomáš Ledvinka |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <span>This article examines three comparative dimensions which need to be examined by anthropology of law with due prudence: the dimension of jurisprudence and anthropology, the dimension of legal systems and their structure, and the dimension of justice. These dimensions are confronted with recent diversion from comparison within anthropology and the validity of critiques of the comparison is demonstrated with respect to the development of the anthropology of law.</span> |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T20:26:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f022eac0f93b44e697d43dc9b722866b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1801-8807 |
language | ces |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T20:26:09Z |
publishDate | 2011-12-01 |
publisher | AntropoWeb |
record_format | Article |
series | AntropoWebzin |
spelling | doaj.art-f022eac0f93b44e697d43dc9b722866b2022-12-22T02:31:21ZcesAntropoWebAntropoWebzin1801-88072011-12-017315516152Komparativní dimenze antropologie právaTomáš Ledvinka0Institute of PhD Study Programmes, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague<span>This article examines three comparative dimensions which need to be examined by anthropology of law with due prudence: the dimension of jurisprudence and anthropology, the dimension of legal systems and their structure, and the dimension of justice. These dimensions are confronted with recent diversion from comparison within anthropology and the validity of critiques of the comparison is demonstrated with respect to the development of the anthropology of law.</span>http://antropologie.zcu.cz/webzin/index.php/webzin/article/view/54legal antropologycomparisoncomparative anthropologylegal pluralism |
spellingShingle | Tomáš Ledvinka Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva AntropoWebzin legal antropology comparison comparative anthropology legal pluralism |
title | Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva |
title_full | Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva |
title_fullStr | Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva |
title_full_unstemmed | Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva |
title_short | Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva |
title_sort | komparativni dimenze antropologie prava |
topic | legal antropology comparison comparative anthropology legal pluralism |
url | http://antropologie.zcu.cz/webzin/index.php/webzin/article/view/54 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomasledvinka komparativnidimenzeantropologieprava |