Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva

<span>This article examines three comparative dimensions which need to be examined by anthropology of law with due prudence: the dimension of jurisprudence and anthropology, the dimension of legal systems and their structure, and the dimension of justice. These dimensions are confronted with r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tomáš Ledvinka
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: AntropoWeb 2011-12-01
Series:AntropoWebzin
Subjects:
Online Access:http://antropologie.zcu.cz/webzin/index.php/webzin/article/view/54
_version_ 1817969778355077120
author Tomáš Ledvinka
author_facet Tomáš Ledvinka
author_sort Tomáš Ledvinka
collection DOAJ
description <span>This article examines three comparative dimensions which need to be examined by anthropology of law with due prudence: the dimension of jurisprudence and anthropology, the dimension of legal systems and their structure, and the dimension of justice. These dimensions are confronted with recent diversion from comparison within anthropology and the validity of critiques of the comparison is demonstrated with respect to the development of the anthropology of law.</span>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:26:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f022eac0f93b44e697d43dc9b722866b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1801-8807
language ces
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:26:09Z
publishDate 2011-12-01
publisher AntropoWeb
record_format Article
series AntropoWebzin
spelling doaj.art-f022eac0f93b44e697d43dc9b722866b2022-12-22T02:31:21ZcesAntropoWebAntropoWebzin1801-88072011-12-017315516152Komparativní dimenze antropologie právaTomáš Ledvinka0Institute of PhD Study Programmes, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague<span>This article examines three comparative dimensions which need to be examined by anthropology of law with due prudence: the dimension of jurisprudence and anthropology, the dimension of legal systems and their structure, and the dimension of justice. These dimensions are confronted with recent diversion from comparison within anthropology and the validity of critiques of the comparison is demonstrated with respect to the development of the anthropology of law.</span>http://antropologie.zcu.cz/webzin/index.php/webzin/article/view/54legal antropologycomparisoncomparative anthropologylegal pluralism
spellingShingle Tomáš Ledvinka
Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva
AntropoWebzin
legal antropology
comparison
comparative anthropology
legal pluralism
title Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva
title_full Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva
title_fullStr Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva
title_full_unstemmed Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva
title_short Komparativní dimenze antropologie práva
title_sort komparativni dimenze antropologie prava
topic legal antropology
comparison
comparative anthropology
legal pluralism
url http://antropologie.zcu.cz/webzin/index.php/webzin/article/view/54
work_keys_str_mv AT tomasledvinka komparativnidimenzeantropologieprava