Comparison of Competitive Models of Metabolic Syndrome Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to apply the structural equation modeling (SEM) to compare the fitness of different competing models (one, two, and three factors) of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Iranian adult population.MethodsData are given on the cardiometabolic risk factors of 841 ind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Diabetes Association 2018-10-01
Series:Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://e-dmj.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2004DMJ/dmj-42-433.pdf
_version_ 1830221234147688448
author Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki
author_facet Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki
author_sort Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to apply the structural equation modeling (SEM) to compare the fitness of different competing models (one, two, and three factors) of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Iranian adult population.MethodsData are given on the cardiometabolic risk factors of 841 individuals with nondiabetic adults from a cross-sectional population-based study of glucose, lipids, and MetS in the north of Iran. The three conceptual hypothesized models (single factor, two correlated factors, and three correlated latent factors) were evaluated by using confirmatory factor analysis with the SEM approach. The summary statistics of correlation coefficients and the model summary fitting indexes were calculated.ResultsThe findings show that a single-factor model and a two-correlated factor model had a poorer summary fitting index compared with a three-correlated factor model. All fitting criteria met the conceptual hypothesized three-correlated factor model for both sexes. However, the correlation structure between the three underlying constructs designating the MetS was higher in women than in men.ConclusionThese results indicate the plausibility of the pathophysiology and etiology of MetS being multifactorial, rather than a single factor, in a nondiabetic Iranian adult population.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T08:22:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f02d908b51ec4caca80424b7096141a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2233-6079
2233-6087
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T08:22:43Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Korean Diabetes Association
record_format Article
series Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
spelling doaj.art-f02d908b51ec4caca80424b7096141a82022-12-21T21:14:42ZengKorean Diabetes AssociationDiabetes & Metabolism Journal2233-60792233-60872018-10-0142543344110.4093/dmj.2018.0010Comparison of Competitive Models of Metabolic Syndrome Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Confirmatory Factor AnalysisKarimollah Hajian-TilakiBackgroundThe purpose of this study was to apply the structural equation modeling (SEM) to compare the fitness of different competing models (one, two, and three factors) of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Iranian adult population.MethodsData are given on the cardiometabolic risk factors of 841 individuals with nondiabetic adults from a cross-sectional population-based study of glucose, lipids, and MetS in the north of Iran. The three conceptual hypothesized models (single factor, two correlated factors, and three correlated latent factors) were evaluated by using confirmatory factor analysis with the SEM approach. The summary statistics of correlation coefficients and the model summary fitting indexes were calculated.ResultsThe findings show that a single-factor model and a two-correlated factor model had a poorer summary fitting index compared with a three-correlated factor model. All fitting criteria met the conceptual hypothesized three-correlated factor model for both sexes. However, the correlation structure between the three underlying constructs designating the MetS was higher in women than in men.ConclusionThese results indicate the plausibility of the pathophysiology and etiology of MetS being multifactorial, rather than a single factor, in a nondiabetic Iranian adult population.https://e-dmj.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2004DMJ/dmj-42-433.pdfFactor analysis, statisticalGlucoseLipidsMetabolic syndromeObesityObesity, abdominal
spellingShingle Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki
Comparison of Competitive Models of Metabolic Syndrome Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Factor analysis, statistical
Glucose
Lipids
Metabolic syndrome
Obesity
Obesity, abdominal
title Comparison of Competitive Models of Metabolic Syndrome Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
title_full Comparison of Competitive Models of Metabolic Syndrome Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Competitive Models of Metabolic Syndrome Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Competitive Models of Metabolic Syndrome Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
title_short Comparison of Competitive Models of Metabolic Syndrome Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
title_sort comparison of competitive models of metabolic syndrome using structural equation modeling a confirmatory factor analysis
topic Factor analysis, statistical
Glucose
Lipids
Metabolic syndrome
Obesity
Obesity, abdominal
url https://e-dmj.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2004DMJ/dmj-42-433.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT karimollahhajiantilaki comparisonofcompetitivemodelsofmetabolicsyndromeusingstructuralequationmodelingaconfirmatoryfactoranalysis