Retrieving sequences of enzymes experimentally characterized but erroneously annotated : the case of the putrescine carbamoyltransferase

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Annotating genomes remains an hazardous task. Mistakes or gaps in such a complex process may occur when relevant knowledge is ignored, whether lost, forgotten or overlooked. This paper exemplifies an approach which could help to ress...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Glansdorff Nicolas, Xu Ying, Naumoff Daniil G, Labedan Bernard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-08-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/5/52
_version_ 1818494726028918784
author Glansdorff Nicolas
Xu Ying
Naumoff Daniil G
Labedan Bernard
author_facet Glansdorff Nicolas
Xu Ying
Naumoff Daniil G
Labedan Bernard
author_sort Glansdorff Nicolas
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Annotating genomes remains an hazardous task. Mistakes or gaps in such a complex process may occur when relevant knowledge is ignored, whether lost, forgotten or overlooked. This paper exemplifies an approach which could help to ressucitate such meaningful data.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We show that a set of closely related sequences which have been annotated as ornithine carbamoyltransferases are actually putrescine carbamoyltransferases. This demonstration is based on the following points : (i) use of enzymatic data which had been overlooked, (ii) rediscovery of a short NH<sub>2</sub>-terminal sequence allowing to reannotate a wrongly annotated ornithine carbamoyltransferase as a putrescine carbamoyltransferase, (iii) identification of conserved motifs allowing to distinguish unambiguously between the two kinds of carbamoyltransferases, and (iv) comparative study of the gene context of these different sequences.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We explain why this specific case of misannotation had not yet been described and draw attention to the fact that analogous instances must be rather frequent. We urge to be especially cautious when high sequence similarity is coupled with an apparent lack of biochemical information. Moreover, from the point of view of genome annotation, proteins which have been studied experimentally but are not correlated with sequence data in current databases qualify as "orphans", just as unassigned genomic open reading frames do. The strategy we used in this paper to bridge such gaps in knowledge could work whenever it is possible to collect a body of facts about experimental data, homology, unnoticed sequence data, and accurate informations about gene context.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T18:10:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f0381aacaff341c0a6132d6f31b4bd4d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2164
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T18:10:18Z
publishDate 2004-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Genomics
spelling doaj.art-f0381aacaff341c0a6132d6f31b4bd4d2022-12-22T01:38:28ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642004-08-01515210.1186/1471-2164-5-52Retrieving sequences of enzymes experimentally characterized but erroneously annotated : the case of the putrescine carbamoyltransferaseGlansdorff NicolasXu YingNaumoff Daniil GLabedan Bernard<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Annotating genomes remains an hazardous task. Mistakes or gaps in such a complex process may occur when relevant knowledge is ignored, whether lost, forgotten or overlooked. This paper exemplifies an approach which could help to ressucitate such meaningful data.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We show that a set of closely related sequences which have been annotated as ornithine carbamoyltransferases are actually putrescine carbamoyltransferases. This demonstration is based on the following points : (i) use of enzymatic data which had been overlooked, (ii) rediscovery of a short NH<sub>2</sub>-terminal sequence allowing to reannotate a wrongly annotated ornithine carbamoyltransferase as a putrescine carbamoyltransferase, (iii) identification of conserved motifs allowing to distinguish unambiguously between the two kinds of carbamoyltransferases, and (iv) comparative study of the gene context of these different sequences.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We explain why this specific case of misannotation had not yet been described and draw attention to the fact that analogous instances must be rather frequent. We urge to be especially cautious when high sequence similarity is coupled with an apparent lack of biochemical information. Moreover, from the point of view of genome annotation, proteins which have been studied experimentally but are not correlated with sequence data in current databases qualify as "orphans", just as unassigned genomic open reading frames do. The strategy we used in this paper to bridge such gaps in knowledge could work whenever it is possible to collect a body of facts about experimental data, homology, unnoticed sequence data, and accurate informations about gene context.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/5/52
spellingShingle Glansdorff Nicolas
Xu Ying
Naumoff Daniil G
Labedan Bernard
Retrieving sequences of enzymes experimentally characterized but erroneously annotated : the case of the putrescine carbamoyltransferase
BMC Genomics
title Retrieving sequences of enzymes experimentally characterized but erroneously annotated : the case of the putrescine carbamoyltransferase
title_full Retrieving sequences of enzymes experimentally characterized but erroneously annotated : the case of the putrescine carbamoyltransferase
title_fullStr Retrieving sequences of enzymes experimentally characterized but erroneously annotated : the case of the putrescine carbamoyltransferase
title_full_unstemmed Retrieving sequences of enzymes experimentally characterized but erroneously annotated : the case of the putrescine carbamoyltransferase
title_short Retrieving sequences of enzymes experimentally characterized but erroneously annotated : the case of the putrescine carbamoyltransferase
title_sort retrieving sequences of enzymes experimentally characterized but erroneously annotated the case of the putrescine carbamoyltransferase
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/5/52
work_keys_str_mv AT glansdorffnicolas retrievingsequencesofenzymesexperimentallycharacterizedbuterroneouslyannotatedthecaseoftheputrescinecarbamoyltransferase
AT xuying retrievingsequencesofenzymesexperimentallycharacterizedbuterroneouslyannotatedthecaseoftheputrescinecarbamoyltransferase
AT naumoffdaniilg retrievingsequencesofenzymesexperimentallycharacterizedbuterroneouslyannotatedthecaseoftheputrescinecarbamoyltransferase
AT labedanbernard retrievingsequencesofenzymesexperimentallycharacterizedbuterroneouslyannotatedthecaseoftheputrescinecarbamoyltransferase