Assessment of nitrous oxide emission factors for arable and grassland ecosystems

We quantified seasonal nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and the associated emission factors (EFs) from: (i) winter oilseed rape (WOSR) cultivated under conventional tillage (CT) and strip tillage (ST) at four fertilizer rates (0, 160, 240 and 320 kg N ha−1) in 2014/2015, and (ii) grassland plots receiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. O’Neill, L. Gallego-Lorenzo, G. J. Lanigan, P. D. Forristal, B. A. Osborne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2020.1825227
_version_ 1819098122980163584
author M. O’Neill
L. Gallego-Lorenzo
G. J. Lanigan
P. D. Forristal
B. A. Osborne
author_facet M. O’Neill
L. Gallego-Lorenzo
G. J. Lanigan
P. D. Forristal
B. A. Osborne
author_sort M. O’Neill
collection DOAJ
description We quantified seasonal nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and the associated emission factors (EFs) from: (i) winter oilseed rape (WOSR) cultivated under conventional tillage (CT) and strip tillage (ST) at four fertilizer rates (0, 160, 240 and 320 kg N ha−1) in 2014/2015, and (ii) grassland plots receiving no fertilizer (0 kg N ha−1), or mineral nitrogen (67 kg N ha−1), and either cattle or pig slurry (50, 100 and 200 m3 ha−1). Greater fluxes were observed at higher soil temperatures and a higher water filled pore space, suggesting that denitrification was the main source of N2O-N from the applied fertilizer/slurry. For WOSR, the N2O EFs ranged from 0.03 to 1.20% with no effect of the cultivation practice on EFs for equal rates of nitrogen fertilizer. Lower EF values were linked to differences in plant growth at individual sites rather than a specific management effect. For the grassland, the N2O EFs were highly variable, ranging from −0.70 to 0.49%, but were generally the highest in treatments receiving the highest concentrations of slurry. The EF values for WOSR illustrates that the Tier 1 approach for calculating EFs may be inadequate and the identification of site-specific effects can aid in refining N2O EF inventories. For the grassland plots all the EFs were significantly lower than the IPCC default values. Although the reason(s) for the low EFs with slurry amendments on grassland is not known, ammonia volatilization could decrease the pool of inorganic N that is available to nitrifying bacteria thereby lowering N2O fluxes.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T00:25:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f03a5cda49394897b2d0dcdabd3af1d3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1943-815X
1943-8168
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T00:25:58Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
spelling doaj.art-f03a5cda49394897b2d0dcdabd3af1d32022-12-21T18:45:03ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Integrative Environmental Sciences1943-815X1943-81682020-12-0117316518510.1080/1943815X.2020.18252271825227Assessment of nitrous oxide emission factors for arable and grassland ecosystemsM. O’Neill0L. Gallego-Lorenzo1G. J. Lanigan2P. D. Forristal3B. A. Osborne4Environmental Research CentreUCD School of Biology of Environmental ScienceEnvironmental Research CentreCrops Research CentreUCD School of Biology of Environmental ScienceWe quantified seasonal nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and the associated emission factors (EFs) from: (i) winter oilseed rape (WOSR) cultivated under conventional tillage (CT) and strip tillage (ST) at four fertilizer rates (0, 160, 240 and 320 kg N ha−1) in 2014/2015, and (ii) grassland plots receiving no fertilizer (0 kg N ha−1), or mineral nitrogen (67 kg N ha−1), and either cattle or pig slurry (50, 100 and 200 m3 ha−1). Greater fluxes were observed at higher soil temperatures and a higher water filled pore space, suggesting that denitrification was the main source of N2O-N from the applied fertilizer/slurry. For WOSR, the N2O EFs ranged from 0.03 to 1.20% with no effect of the cultivation practice on EFs for equal rates of nitrogen fertilizer. Lower EF values were linked to differences in plant growth at individual sites rather than a specific management effect. For the grassland, the N2O EFs were highly variable, ranging from −0.70 to 0.49%, but were generally the highest in treatments receiving the highest concentrations of slurry. The EF values for WOSR illustrates that the Tier 1 approach for calculating EFs may be inadequate and the identification of site-specific effects can aid in refining N2O EF inventories. For the grassland plots all the EFs were significantly lower than the IPCC default values. Although the reason(s) for the low EFs with slurry amendments on grassland is not known, ammonia volatilization could decrease the pool of inorganic N that is available to nitrifying bacteria thereby lowering N2O fluxes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2020.1825227n2oemission factortillageslurryarablegrassland
spellingShingle M. O’Neill
L. Gallego-Lorenzo
G. J. Lanigan
P. D. Forristal
B. A. Osborne
Assessment of nitrous oxide emission factors for arable and grassland ecosystems
Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
n2o
emission factor
tillage
slurry
arable
grassland
title Assessment of nitrous oxide emission factors for arable and grassland ecosystems
title_full Assessment of nitrous oxide emission factors for arable and grassland ecosystems
title_fullStr Assessment of nitrous oxide emission factors for arable and grassland ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of nitrous oxide emission factors for arable and grassland ecosystems
title_short Assessment of nitrous oxide emission factors for arable and grassland ecosystems
title_sort assessment of nitrous oxide emission factors for arable and grassland ecosystems
topic n2o
emission factor
tillage
slurry
arable
grassland
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2020.1825227
work_keys_str_mv AT moneill assessmentofnitrousoxideemissionfactorsforarableandgrasslandecosystems
AT lgallegolorenzo assessmentofnitrousoxideemissionfactorsforarableandgrasslandecosystems
AT gjlanigan assessmentofnitrousoxideemissionfactorsforarableandgrasslandecosystems
AT pdforristal assessmentofnitrousoxideemissionfactorsforarableandgrasslandecosystems
AT baosborne assessmentofnitrousoxideemissionfactorsforarableandgrasslandecosystems