Locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11C): a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy

Abstract Background This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixations in the treatment of patients with OTA/AO type 11C proximal humerus fractures. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minghui Wang, Xiuhui Wang, Pan Cai, Shengyang Guo, Beigang Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-06-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06567-8
_version_ 1797806946720415744
author Minghui Wang
Xiuhui Wang
Pan Cai
Shengyang Guo
Beigang Fu
author_facet Minghui Wang
Xiuhui Wang
Pan Cai
Shengyang Guo
Beigang Fu
author_sort Minghui Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixations in the treatment of patients with OTA/AO type 11C proximal humerus fractures. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures who underwent surgery at our institution from June 2012 to June 2017. Perioperative indicators, postoperative morphological parameters of the proximal humerus, and Constant–Murley scores were evaluated and compared. Results Sixty-eight patients with OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures were enrolled in this study. Overall, 35 patients underwent open reduction and plate screw internal fixation, and 33 patients underwent limited open reduction and locking of the proximal humerus with intramedullary nail internal fixation. The total cohort had a mean follow-up duration of 17.8 months. The mean operation time of the locking plate group was significantly longer than that of the intramedullary nail group (P < 0.05), while the mean bleeding volume was significantly higher in the locking plate group than that in the intramedullary nail group (P < 0.05). The initial neck–shaft angles, final neck–shaft angles, forward flexion ranges, or Constant–Murley scores did not show significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Complications, including screw penetrations, acromion impingement syndrome, infection, and aseptic necrosis of the humeral head, occurred in 8 patients (8/35, 22.8%) in the locking plate group and 5 patients in the intramedullary nail group (5/33, 15.1%; including malunion and acromion impingement syndrome), with no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions Similar satisfactory functional results can be achieved with locking plates and intramedullary nailing for OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures, with no significant difference in the number of complications between these two techniques. However, intramedullary nailing has advantages over locking plates for OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures in terms of operation time and bleeding volume.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T06:15:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f063452db69e45a882565a7114f416aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T06:15:06Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-f063452db69e45a882565a7114f416aa2023-06-11T11:03:44ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742023-06-012411810.1186/s12891-023-06567-8Locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11C): a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacyMinghui Wang0Xiuhui Wang1Pan Cai2Shengyang Guo3Beigang Fu4Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated to Zhoupu HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated to Zhoupu HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated to Zhoupu HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated to Zhoupu HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated to Zhoupu HospitalAbstract Background This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixations in the treatment of patients with OTA/AO type 11C proximal humerus fractures. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures who underwent surgery at our institution from June 2012 to June 2017. Perioperative indicators, postoperative morphological parameters of the proximal humerus, and Constant–Murley scores were evaluated and compared. Results Sixty-eight patients with OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures were enrolled in this study. Overall, 35 patients underwent open reduction and plate screw internal fixation, and 33 patients underwent limited open reduction and locking of the proximal humerus with intramedullary nail internal fixation. The total cohort had a mean follow-up duration of 17.8 months. The mean operation time of the locking plate group was significantly longer than that of the intramedullary nail group (P < 0.05), while the mean bleeding volume was significantly higher in the locking plate group than that in the intramedullary nail group (P < 0.05). The initial neck–shaft angles, final neck–shaft angles, forward flexion ranges, or Constant–Murley scores did not show significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Complications, including screw penetrations, acromion impingement syndrome, infection, and aseptic necrosis of the humeral head, occurred in 8 patients (8/35, 22.8%) in the locking plate group and 5 patients in the intramedullary nail group (5/33, 15.1%; including malunion and acromion impingement syndrome), with no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions Similar satisfactory functional results can be achieved with locking plates and intramedullary nailing for OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures, with no significant difference in the number of complications between these two techniques. However, intramedullary nailing has advantages over locking plates for OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures in terms of operation time and bleeding volume.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06567-8Clinical efficacyOTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1Proximal humerus neck fracturesLocking plateIntramedullary nail
spellingShingle Minghui Wang
Xiuhui Wang
Pan Cai
Shengyang Guo
Beigang Fu
Locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11C): a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Clinical efficacy
OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1
Proximal humerus neck fractures
Locking plate
Intramedullary nail
title Locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11C): a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy
title_full Locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11C): a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy
title_fullStr Locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11C): a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11C): a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy
title_short Locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11C): a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy
title_sort locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures ota ao type 11c a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy
topic Clinical efficacy
OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1
Proximal humerus neck fractures
Locking plate
Intramedullary nail
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06567-8
work_keys_str_mv AT minghuiwang lockingplatefixationversusintramedullarynailfixationforthetreatmentofmultifragmentaryproximalhumerusfracturesotaaotype11capreliminarycomparisonofclinicalefficacy
AT xiuhuiwang lockingplatefixationversusintramedullarynailfixationforthetreatmentofmultifragmentaryproximalhumerusfracturesotaaotype11capreliminarycomparisonofclinicalefficacy
AT pancai lockingplatefixationversusintramedullarynailfixationforthetreatmentofmultifragmentaryproximalhumerusfracturesotaaotype11capreliminarycomparisonofclinicalefficacy
AT shengyangguo lockingplatefixationversusintramedullarynailfixationforthetreatmentofmultifragmentaryproximalhumerusfracturesotaaotype11capreliminarycomparisonofclinicalefficacy
AT beigangfu lockingplatefixationversusintramedullarynailfixationforthetreatmentofmultifragmentaryproximalhumerusfracturesotaaotype11capreliminarycomparisonofclinicalefficacy