Performance of Kernel Estimator and Johnson S<sub>B</sub> Function for Modeling Diameter Distribution of Black Alder (<i>Alnus glutinosa</i> (L.) Gaertn.) Stands

We compare the usefulness of nonparametric and parametric methods of diameter distribution modeling. The nonparametric method was represented by the new tool—kernel estimator of cumulative distribution function with bandwidths of 1 cm (KE1), 2 cm (KE2), and bandwidth obtained automatically (KEA). Jo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piotr Pogoda, Wojciech Ochał, Stanisław Orzeł
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/6/634
_version_ 1797566268140683264
author Piotr Pogoda
Wojciech Ochał
Stanisław Orzeł
author_facet Piotr Pogoda
Wojciech Ochał
Stanisław Orzeł
author_sort Piotr Pogoda
collection DOAJ
description We compare the usefulness of nonparametric and parametric methods of diameter distribution modeling. The nonparametric method was represented by the new tool—kernel estimator of cumulative distribution function with bandwidths of 1 cm (KE1), 2 cm (KE2), and bandwidth obtained automatically (KEA). Johnson S<sub>B</sub> (JSB) function was used for the parametric method. The data set consisted of 7867 measurements made at breast height in 360 sample plots established in 36 managed black alder (<i>Alnus glutinosa</i> (L.) Gaertn.) stands located in southeastern Poland. The model performance was assessed using leave-one-plot-out cross-validation and goodness-of-fit measures: mean error, root mean squared error, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, and Anderson–Darling statistics. The model based on KE1 revealed a good fit to diameters forming training sets. A poor fit was observed for KEA. Frequency of diameters forming test sets were properly fitted by KEA and poorly by KE1. KEA develops more general models that can be used for the approximation of independent data sets. Models based on KE1 adequately fit local irregularities in diameter frequency, which may be considered as an advantageous in some situations and as a drawback in other conditions due to the risk of model overfitting. The application of the JSB function to training sets resulted in the worst fit among the developed models. The performance of the parametric method used to test sets varied depending on the criterion used. Similar to KEA, the JSB function gives more general models that emphasize the rough shape of the approximated distribution. Site type and stand age do not affect the fit of nonparametric models. The JSB function show slightly better fit in older stands. The differences between the average values of Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS), Anderson–Darling (AD), and root mean squared error (RMSE) statistics calculated for models developed with test sets were statistically nonsignificant, which indicates the similar usefulness of the investigated methods for modeling diameter distribution.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:25:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f089c12994f54cfcb4449af39217f62f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:25:16Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-f089c12994f54cfcb4449af39217f62f2023-11-20T02:42:00ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072020-06-0111663410.3390/f11060634Performance of Kernel Estimator and Johnson S<sub>B</sub> Function for Modeling Diameter Distribution of Black Alder (<i>Alnus glutinosa</i> (L.) Gaertn.) StandsPiotr Pogoda0Wojciech Ochał1Stanisław Orzeł2Department of Forest Resources Management, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. 29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Krakow, PolandDepartment of Forest Resources Management, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. 29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Krakow, PolandDepartment of Forest Resources Management, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. 29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Krakow, PolandWe compare the usefulness of nonparametric and parametric methods of diameter distribution modeling. The nonparametric method was represented by the new tool—kernel estimator of cumulative distribution function with bandwidths of 1 cm (KE1), 2 cm (KE2), and bandwidth obtained automatically (KEA). Johnson S<sub>B</sub> (JSB) function was used for the parametric method. The data set consisted of 7867 measurements made at breast height in 360 sample plots established in 36 managed black alder (<i>Alnus glutinosa</i> (L.) Gaertn.) stands located in southeastern Poland. The model performance was assessed using leave-one-plot-out cross-validation and goodness-of-fit measures: mean error, root mean squared error, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, and Anderson–Darling statistics. The model based on KE1 revealed a good fit to diameters forming training sets. A poor fit was observed for KEA. Frequency of diameters forming test sets were properly fitted by KEA and poorly by KE1. KEA develops more general models that can be used for the approximation of independent data sets. Models based on KE1 adequately fit local irregularities in diameter frequency, which may be considered as an advantageous in some situations and as a drawback in other conditions due to the risk of model overfitting. The application of the JSB function to training sets resulted in the worst fit among the developed models. The performance of the parametric method used to test sets varied depending on the criterion used. Similar to KEA, the JSB function gives more general models that emphasize the rough shape of the approximated distribution. Site type and stand age do not affect the fit of nonparametric models. The JSB function show slightly better fit in older stands. The differences between the average values of Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS), Anderson–Darling (AD), and root mean squared error (RMSE) statistics calculated for models developed with test sets were statistically nonsignificant, which indicates the similar usefulness of the investigated methods for modeling diameter distribution.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/6/634diameter distributionkernel estimatorJohnson S<sub>B</sub> functionblack alder
spellingShingle Piotr Pogoda
Wojciech Ochał
Stanisław Orzeł
Performance of Kernel Estimator and Johnson S<sub>B</sub> Function for Modeling Diameter Distribution of Black Alder (<i>Alnus glutinosa</i> (L.) Gaertn.) Stands
Forests
diameter distribution
kernel estimator
Johnson S<sub>B</sub> function
black alder
title Performance of Kernel Estimator and Johnson S<sub>B</sub> Function for Modeling Diameter Distribution of Black Alder (<i>Alnus glutinosa</i> (L.) Gaertn.) Stands
title_full Performance of Kernel Estimator and Johnson S<sub>B</sub> Function for Modeling Diameter Distribution of Black Alder (<i>Alnus glutinosa</i> (L.) Gaertn.) Stands
title_fullStr Performance of Kernel Estimator and Johnson S<sub>B</sub> Function for Modeling Diameter Distribution of Black Alder (<i>Alnus glutinosa</i> (L.) Gaertn.) Stands
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Kernel Estimator and Johnson S<sub>B</sub> Function for Modeling Diameter Distribution of Black Alder (<i>Alnus glutinosa</i> (L.) Gaertn.) Stands
title_short Performance of Kernel Estimator and Johnson S<sub>B</sub> Function for Modeling Diameter Distribution of Black Alder (<i>Alnus glutinosa</i> (L.) Gaertn.) Stands
title_sort performance of kernel estimator and johnson s sub b sub function for modeling diameter distribution of black alder i alnus glutinosa i l gaertn stands
topic diameter distribution
kernel estimator
Johnson S<sub>B</sub> function
black alder
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/6/634
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrpogoda performanceofkernelestimatorandjohnsonssubbsubfunctionformodelingdiameterdistributionofblackalderialnusglutinosailgaertnstands
AT wojciechochał performanceofkernelestimatorandjohnsonssubbsubfunctionformodelingdiameterdistributionofblackalderialnusglutinosailgaertnstands
AT stanisławorzeł performanceofkernelestimatorandjohnsonssubbsubfunctionformodelingdiameterdistributionofblackalderialnusglutinosailgaertnstands