Study on the diagnostic efficacy of ADNEX model in differentiating metastatic and primary ovarian cancer

Study on the diagnostic efficacy of ADNEX model in differentiating metastatic and primary ovarian cancer

Objective: To study the clinical value of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis(IOTA) ADNEX(the Assessment of Differential NEopasia in the adneXa) model in differentiating metastatic ovarian cancer from primary ovarian cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent transvaginal ultrasonography and opera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	NI Zhongxin, CHEN Hui
Format:	Article
Language:	zho
Published:	Editorial Office of Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice 2023-12-01
Series:	Zhenduanxue lilun yu shijian
Subjects:	\|ovarian cancer, metastatic\|iota\|adnex model\|ultrasound diagnosis
Online Access:	https://www.qk.sjtu.edu.cn/jdcp/fileup/1671-2870/PDF/1710732806943-2036059015.pdf

Similar Items

Ovarian Masses-Applicable IOTA ADNEX Model versus Morphological Findings for Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment
by: Tudor Butureanu, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA SRR and LR2 scoring systems for discriminating between malignant and Benign Adnexal masses by junior physicians in Chinese patients: a retrospective observational study
by: Cai Tian, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01)

Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System with final histological diagnosis in adnexal masses: a retrospective study
by: Ahmet Arif Filiz, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Comparison of Ultrasound Scores in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses
by: Mar Pelayo, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Conservative Management of Asymptomatic Adnexal Masses Classified as Benign by the IOTA ADNEX Model: A Prospective Multicenter Portuguese Study
by: Marta Espanhol Brito, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

Validation of IOTA-ADNEX Model in Discriminating Characteristics of Adnexal Masses: A Comparison with Subjective Assessment
by: Soo Young Jeong, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients with Adnexal Masses
by: Clarissa L. Velayo, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Rapid rate of growth in adnexal masses, despite benign appearance on ultrasound, was associated with malignancy. A retrospective analysis of 48 consecutive cases from a single institution
by: Christina M. Moisidis-Tesch, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

Ultrasound Features and Ultrasound Scores in the Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses
by: Mar Pelayo, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification
by: Mar Pelayo, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Comparison of Two-Dimensional IOTA Simple Rules and Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Masses
by: Rishu Goel, et al.

Application of O-RADS US combined with MV-Flow to diagnose ovarian-adnexal tumors
by: Linlin Ruan, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model for Predicting Malignancy in Women with Ovarian Tumors: A Prospective Cohort Study
by: Neha Rashmi, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Conventional, Doppler and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses
by: Zongyu Liu, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)

Comparison of ultrasound−based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study
by: Yanli Hu, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Performance of the IOTA ADNEX Model on Selected Group of Patients with Borderline Ovarian Tumours
by: Adrius Gaurilcikas, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Prospective revalidation of IOTA “two-step”, “alternative two-step” and “three-step” strategies for characterization of adnexal masses – An Indian study focussing the radiology context
by: Shabnam Bhandari Grover, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of adnexal masses
by: Weihui Shentu, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses
by: Wen ting Xie, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Diagnostic value of ultrasound indicators of neoplastic risk in preoperative differentiation of adnexal masses
by: Nabil Abdalla, et al.
Published: (2013-06-01)

The value of ultrasound monitoring of adnexal masses for early detection of ovarian cancer
by: Elizabeth eSuh-Burgmann, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01)

Sonographic Assessment of Complex Ultrasound Morphology Adnexal Tumors in Pregnant Women with the Use of IOTA Simple Rules Risk and ADNEX Scoring Systems
by: Artur Czekierdowski, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

A comparison of the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS, RMI4, IOTA LR2, and IOTA SR systems by senior and junior doctors
by: Yuyang Guo, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01)

O-RADS Classification for Ultrasound Assessment of Adnexal Masses: Agreement between IOTA Lexicon and ADNEX Model for Assigning Risk Group
by: Julio Vara, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)

Diagnostic accuracy of gynecology imaging reporting and data system in evaluation of adnexal lesions
by: Fariba Behnamfar, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Estimating the risk of malignancy of adnexal masses: validation of the ADNEX model in the hands of nonexpert ultrasonographers in a gynaecological oncology centre in China
by: Ping He, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)

Diagnostic Added-Value of Serum CA-125 on the IOTA Simple Rules and Derivation of Practical Combined Prediction Models (IOTA SR X CA-125)
by: Phichayut Phinyo, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

O-RADS combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in risk stratification of adnexal masses
by: Yanyun Shi, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

ADNEXAL TORSION IN 7-8 WEEKS PREGNANCY
by: E. E. Korchagina, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01)

О-RADS and ADNEX MR scoring system: standardization of assessment and modern approaches to stratification of ovarian malignancy risks
by: A. E. Solopova, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

The role of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses
by: Aliaa S. Sheha, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Serum biomarkers for differential diagnosis of adnexal masses in pregnant and nonpregnant women
by: S A Martynov
Published: (2014-08-01)

Postmenopausal adnexal torsion: rare case report
by: Ibrahim Abdelazim, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)

Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model combined with HE4 for identifying early-stage ovarian cancer
by: Suying Yang, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

Adnexal Masses During Pregnancy
by: Mehmet Coşkun Salman, et al.
Published: (2008-04-01)

Adnexal torsion: is there a familial tendency?
by: N. Smorgick, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Primary bilateral ovarian involvement in Burkitt's lymphoma with an adnexal Torsion‐like manifestation: A case report
by: Mehdi Pourghasemian, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)

Association between the sonographer’s experience and diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules
by: Chun-ping Ning, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum D-Dimer Levels in Pregnant Women with Adnexal Torsion
by: Hasan Onur Topçu, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Diagnostic Accuracy of the ADNEX Model for Ovarian Cancer at the 15% Cut-Off Value: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Xiaotong Huang, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)