Electrical and Electrochemical Sensors Based on Carbon Nanotubes for the Monitoring of Chemicals in Water—A Review

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) combine high electrical conductivity with high surface area and chemical stability, which makes them very promising for chemical sensing. While water quality monitoring has particularly strong societal and environmental impacts, a lot of critical sensing needs remain unmet by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gookbin Cho, Sawsen Azzouzi, Gaël Zucchi, Bérengère Lebental
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/1/218
_version_ 1797497605947654144
author Gookbin Cho
Sawsen Azzouzi
Gaël Zucchi
Bérengère Lebental
author_facet Gookbin Cho
Sawsen Azzouzi
Gaël Zucchi
Bérengère Lebental
author_sort Gookbin Cho
collection DOAJ
description Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) combine high electrical conductivity with high surface area and chemical stability, which makes them very promising for chemical sensing. While water quality monitoring has particularly strong societal and environmental impacts, a lot of critical sensing needs remain unmet by commercial technologies. In the present review, we show across 20 water monitoring analytes and 90 references that carbon nanotube-based electrochemical sensors, chemistors and field-effect transistors (chemFET) can meet these needs. A set of 126 additional references provide context and supporting information. After introducing water quality monitoring challenges, the general operation and fabrication principles of CNT water quality sensors are summarized. They are sorted by target analytes (pH, micronutrients and metal ions, nitrogen, hardness, dissolved oxygen, disinfectants, sulfur and miscellaneous) and compared in terms of performances (limit of detection, sensitivity and detection range) and functionalization strategies. For each analyte, the references with best performances are discussed. Overall, the most frequently investigated analytes are H<sup>+</sup> (pH) and lead (with 18% of references each), then cadmium (14%) and nitrite (11%). Micronutrients and toxic metals cover 40% of all references. Electrochemical sensors (73%) have been more investigated than chemistors (14%) or FETs (12%). Limits of detection in the ppt range have been reached, for instance Cu(II) detection with a liquid-gated chemFET using SWCNT functionalized with peptide-enhanced polyaniline or Pb(II) detection with stripping voltammetry using MWCNT functionalized with ionic liquid-dithizone based bucky-gel. The large majority of reports address functionalized CNTs (82%) instead of pristine or carboxyl-functionalized CNTs. For analytes where comparison is possible, FET-based and electrochemical transduction yield better performances than chemistors (Cu(II), Hg(II), Ca(II), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>); non-functionalized CNTs may yield better performances than functionalized ones (Zn(II), pH and chlorine).
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:21:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f0b9661154a346b697e611aa4e05ea07
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:21:38Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-f0b9661154a346b697e611aa4e05ea072023-11-23T12:18:50ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-12-0122121810.3390/s22010218Electrical and Electrochemical Sensors Based on Carbon Nanotubes for the Monitoring of Chemicals in Water—A ReviewGookbin Cho0Sawsen Azzouzi1Gaël Zucchi2Bérengère Lebental3Laboratoire de Physique des Interfaces et des Couches Minces (LPICM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ecole Polytechnique, IP Paris, 91128 Palaiseau, FranceLaboratoire de Physique des Interfaces et des Couches Minces (LPICM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ecole Polytechnique, IP Paris, 91128 Palaiseau, FranceLaboratoire de Physique des Interfaces et des Couches Minces (LPICM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ecole Polytechnique, IP Paris, 91128 Palaiseau, FranceLaboratoire de Physique des Interfaces et des Couches Minces (LPICM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ecole Polytechnique, IP Paris, 91128 Palaiseau, FranceCarbon nanotubes (CNTs) combine high electrical conductivity with high surface area and chemical stability, which makes them very promising for chemical sensing. While water quality monitoring has particularly strong societal and environmental impacts, a lot of critical sensing needs remain unmet by commercial technologies. In the present review, we show across 20 water monitoring analytes and 90 references that carbon nanotube-based electrochemical sensors, chemistors and field-effect transistors (chemFET) can meet these needs. A set of 126 additional references provide context and supporting information. After introducing water quality monitoring challenges, the general operation and fabrication principles of CNT water quality sensors are summarized. They are sorted by target analytes (pH, micronutrients and metal ions, nitrogen, hardness, dissolved oxygen, disinfectants, sulfur and miscellaneous) and compared in terms of performances (limit of detection, sensitivity and detection range) and functionalization strategies. For each analyte, the references with best performances are discussed. Overall, the most frequently investigated analytes are H<sup>+</sup> (pH) and lead (with 18% of references each), then cadmium (14%) and nitrite (11%). Micronutrients and toxic metals cover 40% of all references. Electrochemical sensors (73%) have been more investigated than chemistors (14%) or FETs (12%). Limits of detection in the ppt range have been reached, for instance Cu(II) detection with a liquid-gated chemFET using SWCNT functionalized with peptide-enhanced polyaniline or Pb(II) detection with stripping voltammetry using MWCNT functionalized with ionic liquid-dithizone based bucky-gel. The large majority of reports address functionalized CNTs (82%) instead of pristine or carboxyl-functionalized CNTs. For analytes where comparison is possible, FET-based and electrochemical transduction yield better performances than chemistors (Cu(II), Hg(II), Ca(II), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>); non-functionalized CNTs may yield better performances than functionalized ones (Zn(II), pH and chlorine).https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/1/218carbon nanotubesnanomaterialswater qualitychemical sensorchemistorfield effect transistor
spellingShingle Gookbin Cho
Sawsen Azzouzi
Gaël Zucchi
Bérengère Lebental
Electrical and Electrochemical Sensors Based on Carbon Nanotubes for the Monitoring of Chemicals in Water—A Review
Sensors
carbon nanotubes
nanomaterials
water quality
chemical sensor
chemistor
field effect transistor
title Electrical and Electrochemical Sensors Based on Carbon Nanotubes for the Monitoring of Chemicals in Water—A Review
title_full Electrical and Electrochemical Sensors Based on Carbon Nanotubes for the Monitoring of Chemicals in Water—A Review
title_fullStr Electrical and Electrochemical Sensors Based on Carbon Nanotubes for the Monitoring of Chemicals in Water—A Review
title_full_unstemmed Electrical and Electrochemical Sensors Based on Carbon Nanotubes for the Monitoring of Chemicals in Water—A Review
title_short Electrical and Electrochemical Sensors Based on Carbon Nanotubes for the Monitoring of Chemicals in Water—A Review
title_sort electrical and electrochemical sensors based on carbon nanotubes for the monitoring of chemicals in water a review
topic carbon nanotubes
nanomaterials
water quality
chemical sensor
chemistor
field effect transistor
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/1/218
work_keys_str_mv AT gookbincho electricalandelectrochemicalsensorsbasedoncarbonnanotubesforthemonitoringofchemicalsinwaterareview
AT sawsenazzouzi electricalandelectrochemicalsensorsbasedoncarbonnanotubesforthemonitoringofchemicalsinwaterareview
AT gaelzucchi electricalandelectrochemicalsensorsbasedoncarbonnanotubesforthemonitoringofchemicalsinwaterareview
AT berengerelebental electricalandelectrochemicalsensorsbasedoncarbonnanotubesforthemonitoringofchemicalsinwaterareview