Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients
Abstract Background To compare the visual outcomes, spectacle independent rate and stereopsis in patients who underwent bilateral implantation of extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL), or a blend approach of EDOF and bifocal IOL. Methods A total of 60 cataract patients, who were sche...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | BMC Ophthalmology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03228-1 |
| _version_ | 1797453512875966464 |
|---|---|
| author | Tianxu Xiong Hao Chen Wei Fan |
| author_facet | Tianxu Xiong Hao Chen Wei Fan |
| author_sort | Tianxu Xiong |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background To compare the visual outcomes, spectacle independent rate and stereopsis in patients who underwent bilateral implantation of extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL), or a blend approach of EDOF and bifocal IOL. Methods A total of 60 cataract patients, who were scheduled for phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in both eyes in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, were enrolled and divided into Micro monovision group(-0.5D~-1.0D), Non-micro monovision group (< 0.5D) with Symfony IOL, and Mixed group with Symfony and ZMB00 IOLs. Three months postoperatively, we compared the visual acuity, modulation transfer function (MTF), defocus curve, stereopsis, spectacle independence, and photic phenomena among the three groups. Results Compared to the Non-micro monovision group (UNVA: 0.07 ± 0.04), Micro monovision group (UNVA: 0.00 ± 0.07, P < 0.001) and Mixed group (UNVA: -0.02 ± 0.06, P < 0.001) showed improvement in binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA). Additionally, Mixed group exhibited lower MTF10 (MTF10: 0.38 ± 0.24) and point spread function (PSF: 0.192 ± 0.269) results in their non-dominant eye compared to both Micro monovision group (MTF10: 0.56 ± 0.21, P = 0.027; PSF: 0.417 ± 0.282, P = 0.034) and Non-micro monovision group (MTF10: 0.55 ± 0.19, P = 0.038; PSF: 0.408 ± 0.285, P = 0.003). Spectacle independence for near vision were higher in both the Micro monovision (45%) and Mixed (55%) group compared to the Non-micro monovision group (40%). The Mixed group also reported higher incidence of photic phenomena (25%). However, there were no significant differences in stereoscopic function among the three groups. Conclusion Both micro monovision and mix-and-match methods can help patients to obtain better visual outcomes at different distances. Mix-and-match method has better near visual acuity, while micro monovision method has better intermediate visual acuity. Non-micro monovision methods will affect patients’ near vision outcomes. Binocularly implanted EDOF IOL has better contrast sensitivity. Clinical trial registration Registration date:11/07/2023. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2300073433. Trial registry: West China Hospital of Sichuan University retrospectively registered. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T15:23:55Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f0be7da0a3904ffebf319418ff64530a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2415 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T15:23:55Z |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Ophthalmology |
| spelling | doaj.art-f0be7da0a3904ffebf319418ff64530a2023-11-26T12:40:20ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152023-11-012311910.1186/s12886-023-03228-1Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patientsTianxu Xiong0Hao Chen1Wei Fan2Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityAbstract Background To compare the visual outcomes, spectacle independent rate and stereopsis in patients who underwent bilateral implantation of extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL), or a blend approach of EDOF and bifocal IOL. Methods A total of 60 cataract patients, who were scheduled for phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in both eyes in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, were enrolled and divided into Micro monovision group(-0.5D~-1.0D), Non-micro monovision group (< 0.5D) with Symfony IOL, and Mixed group with Symfony and ZMB00 IOLs. Three months postoperatively, we compared the visual acuity, modulation transfer function (MTF), defocus curve, stereopsis, spectacle independence, and photic phenomena among the three groups. Results Compared to the Non-micro monovision group (UNVA: 0.07 ± 0.04), Micro monovision group (UNVA: 0.00 ± 0.07, P < 0.001) and Mixed group (UNVA: -0.02 ± 0.06, P < 0.001) showed improvement in binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA). Additionally, Mixed group exhibited lower MTF10 (MTF10: 0.38 ± 0.24) and point spread function (PSF: 0.192 ± 0.269) results in their non-dominant eye compared to both Micro monovision group (MTF10: 0.56 ± 0.21, P = 0.027; PSF: 0.417 ± 0.282, P = 0.034) and Non-micro monovision group (MTF10: 0.55 ± 0.19, P = 0.038; PSF: 0.408 ± 0.285, P = 0.003). Spectacle independence for near vision were higher in both the Micro monovision (45%) and Mixed (55%) group compared to the Non-micro monovision group (40%). The Mixed group also reported higher incidence of photic phenomena (25%). However, there were no significant differences in stereoscopic function among the three groups. Conclusion Both micro monovision and mix-and-match methods can help patients to obtain better visual outcomes at different distances. Mix-and-match method has better near visual acuity, while micro monovision method has better intermediate visual acuity. Non-micro monovision methods will affect patients’ near vision outcomes. Binocularly implanted EDOF IOL has better contrast sensitivity. Clinical trial registration Registration date:11/07/2023. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2300073433. Trial registry: West China Hospital of Sichuan University retrospectively registered.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03228-1CataractPresbyopia corrected intraocular lensMicro monovisionBlend |
| spellingShingle | Tianxu Xiong Hao Chen Wei Fan Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients BMC Ophthalmology Cataract Presbyopia corrected intraocular lens Micro monovision Blend |
| title | Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients |
| title_full | Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients |
| title_short | Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients |
| title_sort | comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients |
| topic | Cataract Presbyopia corrected intraocular lens Micro monovision Blend |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03228-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tianxuxiong comparisonofbilateralimplantationofanextendeddepthoffocuslensesandablendapproachofextendeddepthoffocuslensesandbifocallensesincataractpatients AT haochen comparisonofbilateralimplantationofanextendeddepthoffocuslensesandablendapproachofextendeddepthoffocuslensesandbifocallensesincataractpatients AT weifan comparisonofbilateralimplantationofanextendeddepthoffocuslensesandablendapproachofextendeddepthoffocuslensesandbifocallensesincataractpatients |