« Construction directe » vs « construction indirecte » :quelle interprétation sémantique dans la relation de possession en bété ?
This paper provides a description of semantic values of bete language which characterized a phrasal opposition very widespread in Africa and which has been studied for decades i.e. direct vs. indirect nominal determination. Some studies have focused on looking for a unique semantic feature whose pre...
Main Author: | François Blé KIPRÉ |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO
|
Series: | Corela |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/corela/4631 |
Similar Items
-
MOYENS D’EXPRESSION DE LA POSSESSION INALIÉNABLE DANS LES CONSTRUCTIONS VERBALES AVEC DES NOMS DE PARTIES DU CORPS (DOMAINE FRANÇAIS-ROUMAIN)
by: Daniela DINCĂ, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Изразяване на посесивност (притежателност) в производната субстантивна лексика в българския и чешкия език
by: Цветанка [TSvetanka] Аврамова [Avramova]
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Non-canonical possessive constructions in Negidal and other Tungusic languages: a new analysis of the so-called “alienable possession” suffix
by: Aralova Natalia, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Syntaxe des possessions inaliénable et aliénable : approche métaopérationnelle
by: Jean-François Kpli
Published: (2014-06-01) -
The Relationship between Competence and Performance: Towards a Comprehensive TG Grammar
by: AbdulHussein Reishaan, et al.
Published: (2008-09-01)