The Power of Language in the Classical Period of Kalām

When examining classical-era kalām books, we may be at first surprised by the great importance given to language in their theological discussions and the recognition of linguists (ahl al-lugha) as authorities. Whenever Muslim theologians (mutakallimūn) deal with any issue, they first determine how t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mehmet Bulğen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scientific Studies Association (ILEM) 2019-05-01
Series:Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/10-cilt-5-sayi-1/2-m0065/5.1-en-bulgen.pdf
_version_ 1828021204771930112
author Mehmet Bulğen
author_facet Mehmet Bulğen
author_sort Mehmet Bulğen
collection DOAJ
description When examining classical-era kalām books, we may be at first surprised by the great importance given to language in their theological discussions and the recognition of linguists (ahl al-lugha) as authorities. Whenever Muslim theologians (mutakallimūn) deal with any issue, they first determine how the linguists would have made sense of the relevant terms and then explain it in a way that is appropriate for use in Arabic. This sensitivity to language is not only limited to defining the Islamic terms such as “belief” (īmān), “unbelief” (kufr), “disobedience” (ma‘ṣiya), and “justice” (‘adl), but also includes defining the terms of physics and cosmology. In other words, when conceptualizing terms such as “universe” (al-‘ālam), “body” (jism), “substance (jawhar), “accident” (‘araḍ), “motion” (ḥaraka), and “rest” (sukūn), these theologians mostly take into account how the speakers of language commonly use them. This article seeks to answer the question of why they regard language as an important discipline, alongside cosmological issues, in the context of the language-thought-existence relationship. Perhaps by making a thought system based on Arabic, which happened to emerge in their regions as a result of long-time interactions with the natural environment and consequently became conveyers of a particular worldview and way of thinking, they sought to resist the impact of the Greek worldview and logic that poured into the Islamic world from all lands via translations. In other words, the primary reason why the theologians considered language as the authority in theological and cosmological discussions was because they saw it, along with its structure and concepts, as a carrier of their traditional worldviews and way of thinking.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T11:48:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f0c80f8b6a45460c845654f28ea16e0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2547-9415
2547-9415
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T11:48:55Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Scientific Studies Association (ILEM)
record_format Article
series Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences
spelling doaj.art-f0c80f8b6a45460c845654f28ea16e0f2023-02-15T16:17:13ZengScientific Studies Association (ILEM)Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences2547-94152547-94152019-05-0151378210.12658/Nazariyat.5.1.M0065enThe Power of Language in the Classical Period of KalāmMehmet Bulğen0Marmara UniversityWhen examining classical-era kalām books, we may be at first surprised by the great importance given to language in their theological discussions and the recognition of linguists (ahl al-lugha) as authorities. Whenever Muslim theologians (mutakallimūn) deal with any issue, they first determine how the linguists would have made sense of the relevant terms and then explain it in a way that is appropriate for use in Arabic. This sensitivity to language is not only limited to defining the Islamic terms such as “belief” (īmān), “unbelief” (kufr), “disobedience” (ma‘ṣiya), and “justice” (‘adl), but also includes defining the terms of physics and cosmology. In other words, when conceptualizing terms such as “universe” (al-‘ālam), “body” (jism), “substance (jawhar), “accident” (‘araḍ), “motion” (ḥaraka), and “rest” (sukūn), these theologians mostly take into account how the speakers of language commonly use them. This article seeks to answer the question of why they regard language as an important discipline, alongside cosmological issues, in the context of the language-thought-existence relationship. Perhaps by making a thought system based on Arabic, which happened to emerge in their regions as a result of long-time interactions with the natural environment and consequently became conveyers of a particular worldview and way of thinking, they sought to resist the impact of the Greek worldview and logic that poured into the Islamic world from all lands via translations. In other words, the primary reason why the theologians considered language as the authority in theological and cosmological discussions was because they saw it, along with its structure and concepts, as a carrier of their traditional worldviews and way of thinking.https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/10-cilt-5-sayi-1/2-m0065/5.1-en-bulgen.pdfKalāmLanguagelogicthoughtexistence
spellingShingle Mehmet Bulğen
The Power of Language in the Classical Period of Kalām
Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences
Kalām
Language
logic
thought
existence
title The Power of Language in the Classical Period of Kalām
title_full The Power of Language in the Classical Period of Kalām
title_fullStr The Power of Language in the Classical Period of Kalām
title_full_unstemmed The Power of Language in the Classical Period of Kalām
title_short The Power of Language in the Classical Period of Kalām
title_sort power of language in the classical period of kalam
topic Kalām
Language
logic
thought
existence
url https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/10-cilt-5-sayi-1/2-m0065/5.1-en-bulgen.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mehmetbulgen thepoweroflanguageintheclassicalperiodofkalam
AT mehmetbulgen poweroflanguageintheclassicalperiodofkalam