The Scientific Controversy on Covid-19 and the Image of Science as an Expert System: Comparing the Debate in Italy and UK
<span class="abs_content">The theoretical context of this article refers to the relations between expert systems and public opinion, according to an approach that describes how scientists' knowledge is questioned during serious globalized crises, such as epidemics and pandemics....
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Coordinamento SIBA
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Partecipazione e Conflitto |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/26455 |
| _version_ | 1797680525433896960 |
|---|---|
| author | Fabio Lucchini Michele Marzulli |
| author_facet | Fabio Lucchini Michele Marzulli |
| author_sort | Fabio Lucchini |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <span class="abs_content">The theoretical context of this article refers to the relations between expert systems and public opinion, according to an approach that describes how scientists' knowledge is questioned during serious globalized crises, such as epidemics and pandemics. In this regard, a typology of Italian and UK Twitter profiles was proposed in order to define the role of scientists in the debate around Covid-19, and to answer to what appear to be relevant research questions: What are the main scientific issues of the controversy? How is shaped the multifaceted pro-vax front? What image of science as an expert system emerges in the debate on Covid-19? To do that, a web-ethnography was performed, based on the analysis of some Italian/UK Twitter profiles of scientists, analysing a selection of interactions generated around them. The main research results are presented with reference to 'pro-vax' emerging profiles (a less studied context than the 'anti-vax' front), trying to illustrate the complexity of the dispute and the adequacy of discourse about science. In the end, the authors suggest that the idea of science as a 'truth' that people should simply trust - overly simplistic in the past - is not entirely plausible in today's public debate in social networks.</span><br /> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T23:31:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f0e65883ce824f4abff1ecc501b0bab6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1972-7623 2035-6609 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T23:31:18Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Coordinamento SIBA |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Partecipazione e Conflitto |
| spelling | doaj.art-f0e65883ce824f4abff1ecc501b0bab62023-09-20T07:59:59ZengCoordinamento SIBAPartecipazione e Conflitto1972-76232035-66092023-01-0115353054810.1285/i20356609v15i3p53022799The Scientific Controversy on Covid-19 and the Image of Science as an Expert System: Comparing the Debate in Italy and UKFabio Lucchini0Michele Marzulli1eCampus University, Novedrate, ComoCa’ Foscari University of<span class="abs_content">The theoretical context of this article refers to the relations between expert systems and public opinion, according to an approach that describes how scientists' knowledge is questioned during serious globalized crises, such as epidemics and pandemics. In this regard, a typology of Italian and UK Twitter profiles was proposed in order to define the role of scientists in the debate around Covid-19, and to answer to what appear to be relevant research questions: What are the main scientific issues of the controversy? How is shaped the multifaceted pro-vax front? What image of science as an expert system emerges in the debate on Covid-19? To do that, a web-ethnography was performed, based on the analysis of some Italian/UK Twitter profiles of scientists, analysing a selection of interactions generated around them. The main research results are presented with reference to 'pro-vax' emerging profiles (a less studied context than the 'anti-vax' front), trying to illustrate the complexity of the dispute and the adequacy of discourse about science. In the end, the authors suggest that the idea of science as a 'truth' that people should simply trust - overly simplistic in the past - is not entirely plausible in today's public debate in social networks.</span><br />http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/26455controversycovid-19expert systemsscientific methodsocial mediasocial network |
| spellingShingle | Fabio Lucchini Michele Marzulli The Scientific Controversy on Covid-19 and the Image of Science as an Expert System: Comparing the Debate in Italy and UK Partecipazione e Conflitto controversy covid-19 expert systems scientific method social media social network |
| title | The Scientific Controversy on Covid-19 and the Image of Science as an Expert System: Comparing the Debate in Italy and UK |
| title_full | The Scientific Controversy on Covid-19 and the Image of Science as an Expert System: Comparing the Debate in Italy and UK |
| title_fullStr | The Scientific Controversy on Covid-19 and the Image of Science as an Expert System: Comparing the Debate in Italy and UK |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Scientific Controversy on Covid-19 and the Image of Science as an Expert System: Comparing the Debate in Italy and UK |
| title_short | The Scientific Controversy on Covid-19 and the Image of Science as an Expert System: Comparing the Debate in Italy and UK |
| title_sort | scientific controversy on covid 19 and the image of science as an expert system comparing the debate in italy and uk |
| topic | controversy covid-19 expert systems scientific method social media social network |
| url | http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/26455 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fabiolucchini thescientificcontroversyoncovid19andtheimageofscienceasanexpertsystemcomparingthedebateinitalyanduk AT michelemarzulli thescientificcontroversyoncovid19andtheimageofscienceasanexpertsystemcomparingthedebateinitalyanduk AT fabiolucchini scientificcontroversyoncovid19andtheimageofscienceasanexpertsystemcomparingthedebateinitalyanduk AT michelemarzulli scientificcontroversyoncovid19andtheimageofscienceasanexpertsystemcomparingthedebateinitalyanduk |