Monumentality vs. everyday life: architecture's public role

Conference held in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, on March 18, 2006. Thoughts about architecture and the nation." Architecture is everything dealing with construction." (ARGAN, c. 1992). An object's cultural and ethical value is measured by how well it addresses demand, which in turn i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joaquim Manoel Guedes Sobrinho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo (USP) 2007-06-01
Series:Pós: Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo da FAUUSP
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.usp.br/posfau/article/view/43504
_version_ 1819068844967198720
author Joaquim Manoel Guedes Sobrinho
author_facet Joaquim Manoel Guedes Sobrinho
author_sort Joaquim Manoel Guedes Sobrinho
collection DOAJ
description Conference held in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, on March 18, 2006. Thoughts about architecture and the nation." Architecture is everything dealing with construction." (ARGAN, c. 1992). An object's cultural and ethical value is measured by how well it addresses demand, which in turn is related to the planet Earth, to scarce resources, and to people's survival. Architecture, its craft, and its teaching are studied from the perspective of the act, which is the art of building, to meet social, public and private demands through historical processes of power games, at a given place and time. Architecture is reduced to its essence to unveil the roots of its emergence and understand the architect's responsibilities in the new mass society, when we enter this" new popular period in history" (SANTOS; SOUZA, c1998). We suggest the following sequence of procedures as a path of knowledge and to support the free development of invention: 1) Initially assess the prospective problem to choose and study the location and the tasks of the architect, the client, society, and government; 2) identify and understand building plans for that location; 3) study the activities, flows, quantity, quality and combination of spaces resulting from the conflicting yearnings of people, in line with social needs and translated into private and public building plans; 4) graphically analyze the sectorial subsystems of areas associated according to affinities, considering their arrangement and organization in the site; 5) work on the rigorous construction of architecture, which in final analysis is matter and form; It should be pointed out that it is necessary to: 6) expand the supply of information on specific architectural problems to be addressed, and to organize the actual and effective involvement of people in the discussion of projects and works of their interest, unlike assembly and participative meetings; 7) expand opportunities to allow a greater number of architects to take part in building the nation, which implies the government implementing new recruitment policies. Three projects are presented to illustrate the involvement of architects in the architectural craft in Brazil: 1) Brasília's Pilot Plan, 1957; 2) the city of Caraíba, (Pillar), Jaguarari, Bahia, 1978; and 3) Bicocca project, in Milan, Italy, 1987.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T16:40:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f0e8a723055f40ffb534a072036c6ea9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1518-9554
2317-2762
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T16:40:37Z
publishDate 2007-06-01
publisher Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
record_format Article
series Pós: Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo da FAUUSP
spelling doaj.art-f0e8a723055f40ffb534a072036c6ea92022-12-21T18:57:07ZengUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Pós: Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo da FAUUSP1518-95542317-27622007-06-01021264910.11606/issn.2317-2762.v0i21p26-4943307Monumentality vs. everyday life: architecture's public roleJoaquim Manoel Guedes Sobrinho0União Internacional de Arquitetos; Departamento de São PauloConference held in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, on March 18, 2006. Thoughts about architecture and the nation." Architecture is everything dealing with construction." (ARGAN, c. 1992). An object's cultural and ethical value is measured by how well it addresses demand, which in turn is related to the planet Earth, to scarce resources, and to people's survival. Architecture, its craft, and its teaching are studied from the perspective of the act, which is the art of building, to meet social, public and private demands through historical processes of power games, at a given place and time. Architecture is reduced to its essence to unveil the roots of its emergence and understand the architect's responsibilities in the new mass society, when we enter this" new popular period in history" (SANTOS; SOUZA, c1998). We suggest the following sequence of procedures as a path of knowledge and to support the free development of invention: 1) Initially assess the prospective problem to choose and study the location and the tasks of the architect, the client, society, and government; 2) identify and understand building plans for that location; 3) study the activities, flows, quantity, quality and combination of spaces resulting from the conflicting yearnings of people, in line with social needs and translated into private and public building plans; 4) graphically analyze the sectorial subsystems of areas associated according to affinities, considering their arrangement and organization in the site; 5) work on the rigorous construction of architecture, which in final analysis is matter and form; It should be pointed out that it is necessary to: 6) expand the supply of information on specific architectural problems to be addressed, and to organize the actual and effective involvement of people in the discussion of projects and works of their interest, unlike assembly and participative meetings; 7) expand opportunities to allow a greater number of architects to take part in building the nation, which implies the government implementing new recruitment policies. Three projects are presented to illustrate the involvement of architects in the architectural craft in Brazil: 1) Brasília's Pilot Plan, 1957; 2) the city of Caraíba, (Pillar), Jaguarari, Bahia, 1978; and 3) Bicocca project, in Milan, Italy, 1987.http://revistas.usp.br/posfau/article/view/43504Monumentalidadecotidianonação
spellingShingle Joaquim Manoel Guedes Sobrinho
Monumentality vs. everyday life: architecture's public role
Pós: Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo da FAUUSP
Monumentalidade
cotidiano
nação
title Monumentality vs. everyday life: architecture's public role
title_full Monumentality vs. everyday life: architecture's public role
title_fullStr Monumentality vs. everyday life: architecture's public role
title_full_unstemmed Monumentality vs. everyday life: architecture's public role
title_short Monumentality vs. everyday life: architecture's public role
title_sort monumentality vs everyday life architecture s public role
topic Monumentalidade
cotidiano
nação
url http://revistas.usp.br/posfau/article/view/43504
work_keys_str_mv AT joaquimmanoelguedessobrinho monumentalityvseverydaylifearchitecturespublicrole