Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face.

OBJECTIVES:To investigate the levels of agreement between self-reported responses to the Adult Pre-exercise Screening System (APSS) questionnaire using online versus face-to-face (F2F) modalities. DESIGN:Convenience sample of adults completing a pre-exercise screening questionnaire using different m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lynda Norton, Jessica Thomas, Nadia Bevan, Kevin Norton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6019396?pdf=render
_version_ 1818932326586908672
author Lynda Norton
Jessica Thomas
Nadia Bevan
Kevin Norton
author_facet Lynda Norton
Jessica Thomas
Nadia Bevan
Kevin Norton
author_sort Lynda Norton
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES:To investigate the levels of agreement between self-reported responses to the Adult Pre-exercise Screening System (APSS) questionnaire using online versus face-to-face (F2F) modalities. DESIGN:Convenience sample of adults completing a pre-exercise screening questionnaire using different modalities. METHODS:Adult volunteers (n = 94) were recruited to complete the APSS using both online and F2F modalities. Participants were provided a URL link to an online APSS questionnaire then followed-up the next day in a F2F interview. Objective health risk factors were also measured. Comparisons between responses were undertaken using kappa and correlation statistics to determine levels of agreement. RESULTS:The levels of agreement between online versus F2F responses for the seven compulsory Stage 1 questions (known diseases and signs and/or symptoms of disease) were >94% (kappa = 0.644-0.794). Response comparisons for Stage 2 questions on health risk factors were also generally high (>82% agreement) but there were larger differences between reported and measured risk factors in Stage 3. CONCLUSIONS:Levels of agreement between the Stage 1 responses were substantial and support the use of this online option for pre-exercise screening. There were larger differences between self-reported and objectively measured health risk factors in Stages 2 and 3.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T04:30:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f0f6afc0a1c54be0b49b71e8f5d59ed6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T04:30:43Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-f0f6afc0a1c54be0b49b71e8f5d59ed62022-12-21T19:53:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01136e019983610.1371/journal.pone.0199836Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face.Lynda NortonJessica ThomasNadia BevanKevin NortonOBJECTIVES:To investigate the levels of agreement between self-reported responses to the Adult Pre-exercise Screening System (APSS) questionnaire using online versus face-to-face (F2F) modalities. DESIGN:Convenience sample of adults completing a pre-exercise screening questionnaire using different modalities. METHODS:Adult volunteers (n = 94) were recruited to complete the APSS using both online and F2F modalities. Participants were provided a URL link to an online APSS questionnaire then followed-up the next day in a F2F interview. Objective health risk factors were also measured. Comparisons between responses were undertaken using kappa and correlation statistics to determine levels of agreement. RESULTS:The levels of agreement between online versus F2F responses for the seven compulsory Stage 1 questions (known diseases and signs and/or symptoms of disease) were >94% (kappa = 0.644-0.794). Response comparisons for Stage 2 questions on health risk factors were also generally high (>82% agreement) but there were larger differences between reported and measured risk factors in Stage 3. CONCLUSIONS:Levels of agreement between the Stage 1 responses were substantial and support the use of this online option for pre-exercise screening. There were larger differences between self-reported and objectively measured health risk factors in Stages 2 and 3.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6019396?pdf=render
spellingShingle Lynda Norton
Jessica Thomas
Nadia Bevan
Kevin Norton
Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face.
PLoS ONE
title Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face.
title_full Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face.
title_fullStr Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face.
title_full_unstemmed Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face.
title_short Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face.
title_sort agreement between pre exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face to face
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6019396?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lyndanorton agreementbetweenpreexercisescreeningquestionnairescompletedonlineversusfacetoface
AT jessicathomas agreementbetweenpreexercisescreeningquestionnairescompletedonlineversusfacetoface
AT nadiabevan agreementbetweenpreexercisescreeningquestionnairescompletedonlineversusfacetoface
AT kevinnorton agreementbetweenpreexercisescreeningquestionnairescompletedonlineversusfacetoface