Developmental Prosopagnosia and Elastic Versus Static Face Recognition in an Incidental Learning Task
Previous research on the beneficial effect of motion has postulated that learning a face in motion provides additional cues to recognition. Surprisingly, however, few studies have examined the beneficial effect of motion in an incidental learning task and developmental prosopagnosia (DP) even though...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-08-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02098/full |
| _version_ | 1818408020669890560 |
|---|---|
| author | Tom Bylemans Leia Vrancken Karl Verfaillie |
| author_facet | Tom Bylemans Leia Vrancken Karl Verfaillie |
| author_sort | Tom Bylemans |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Previous research on the beneficial effect of motion has postulated that learning a face in motion provides additional cues to recognition. Surprisingly, however, few studies have examined the beneficial effect of motion in an incidental learning task and developmental prosopagnosia (DP) even though such studies could provide more valuable information about everyday face recognition compared to the perception of static faces. In the current study, 18 young adults (Experiment 1) and five DPs and 10 age-matched controls (Experiment 2) participated in an incidental learning task during which both static and elastically moving unfamiliar faces were sequentially presented and were to be recognized in a delayed visual search task during which the faces could either keep their original presentation or switch (from static to elastically moving or vice versa). In Experiment 1, performance in the elastic-elastic condition reached a significant improvement relative to the elastic-static and static-elastic condition, however, no significant difference could be detected relative to the static-static condition. Except for higher scores in the elastic-elastic compared to the static-elastic condition in the age-matched group, no other significant differences were detected between conditions for both the DPs and the age-matched controls. The current study could not provide compelling evidence for a general beneficial effect of motion. Age-matched controls performed generally worse than DPs, which may potentially be explained by their higher rates of false alarms. Factors that could have influenced the results are discussed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T09:37:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f103f21345af46dd8ff806c5317c08ce |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-1078 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T09:37:06Z |
| publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Psychology |
| spelling | doaj.art-f103f21345af46dd8ff806c5317c08ce2022-12-21T23:07:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-08-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.02098538850Developmental Prosopagnosia and Elastic Versus Static Face Recognition in an Incidental Learning TaskTom BylemansLeia VranckenKarl VerfailliePrevious research on the beneficial effect of motion has postulated that learning a face in motion provides additional cues to recognition. Surprisingly, however, few studies have examined the beneficial effect of motion in an incidental learning task and developmental prosopagnosia (DP) even though such studies could provide more valuable information about everyday face recognition compared to the perception of static faces. In the current study, 18 young adults (Experiment 1) and five DPs and 10 age-matched controls (Experiment 2) participated in an incidental learning task during which both static and elastically moving unfamiliar faces were sequentially presented and were to be recognized in a delayed visual search task during which the faces could either keep their original presentation or switch (from static to elastically moving or vice versa). In Experiment 1, performance in the elastic-elastic condition reached a significant improvement relative to the elastic-static and static-elastic condition, however, no significant difference could be detected relative to the static-static condition. Except for higher scores in the elastic-elastic compared to the static-elastic condition in the age-matched group, no other significant differences were detected between conditions for both the DPs and the age-matched controls. The current study could not provide compelling evidence for a general beneficial effect of motion. Age-matched controls performed generally worse than DPs, which may potentially be explained by their higher rates of false alarms. Factors that could have influenced the results are discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02098/fullface perceptionmoving vs. static facesdevelopmental prosopagnosiavisual learningincidental learning |
| spellingShingle | Tom Bylemans Leia Vrancken Karl Verfaillie Developmental Prosopagnosia and Elastic Versus Static Face Recognition in an Incidental Learning Task Frontiers in Psychology face perception moving vs. static faces developmental prosopagnosia visual learning incidental learning |
| title | Developmental Prosopagnosia and Elastic Versus Static Face Recognition in an Incidental Learning Task |
| title_full | Developmental Prosopagnosia and Elastic Versus Static Face Recognition in an Incidental Learning Task |
| title_fullStr | Developmental Prosopagnosia and Elastic Versus Static Face Recognition in an Incidental Learning Task |
| title_full_unstemmed | Developmental Prosopagnosia and Elastic Versus Static Face Recognition in an Incidental Learning Task |
| title_short | Developmental Prosopagnosia and Elastic Versus Static Face Recognition in an Incidental Learning Task |
| title_sort | developmental prosopagnosia and elastic versus static face recognition in an incidental learning task |
| topic | face perception moving vs. static faces developmental prosopagnosia visual learning incidental learning |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02098/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tombylemans developmentalprosopagnosiaandelasticversusstaticfacerecognitioninanincidentallearningtask AT leiavrancken developmentalprosopagnosiaandelasticversusstaticfacerecognitioninanincidentallearningtask AT karlverfaillie developmentalprosopagnosiaandelasticversusstaticfacerecognitioninanincidentallearningtask |