Usefulness and safety of the “God’s Hand” pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in femoral catheterization
PURPOSE :We aimed to assess the usefulness and safety of the God’s Hand pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in patients undergoing percutaneous endovascular procedures via femoral artery.METHODS:Two hundred thirty-seven patients in whom hemostasis of femoral catheterization was achieved usin...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Galenos Publishing House
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology |
Online Access: |
http://www.dirjournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/usefulness-and-safety-of-the-gods-hand-pneumatic-c/55363
|
_version_ | 1797691250398199808 |
---|---|
author | Sungwon Kim Jae Hyun Kwon Yoon Hee Han Jeung Sook Kim |
author_facet | Sungwon Kim Jae Hyun Kwon Yoon Hee Han Jeung Sook Kim |
author_sort | Sungwon Kim |
collection | DOAJ |
description | PURPOSE :We aimed to assess the usefulness and safety of the God’s Hand pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in patients undergoing percutaneous endovascular procedures via femoral artery.METHODS:Two hundred thirty-seven patients in whom hemostasis of femoral catheterization was achieved using a God’s Hand pneumatic compression device were enrolled. The patients were divided into group A, those in whom the device was applied for four hours, and group B, those in whom the device was applied for two hours, with an additional two hours of bed rest in both groups. Groups A and B were regrouped to groups A’ and B’ using the propensity score matching method (n=65, for both). Chi-squared test and logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between the complication rate and patient characteristics and procedure-related factors.RESULTS:Clinical success was achieved in 216 of 237 patients (91.1%): 63 in group A (84%) and 153 in group B (94.4%); in propensity score matched groups, clinical success was seen in 47 patients in group A’ (81.5%) and 62 patients in group B’ (95.4%). Group B’ showed a higher clinical success rate than group A’ (P = 0.028). There were no major complications. In logistic regression models, a negative association was noted between the complication rate and the duration of God’s Hand application; however, this association was not statistically significant.CONCLUSION:The God’s Hand pneumatic compression device is effective and safe for the hemostasis of femoral catheterization, and four hours of bed rest is sufficient for hemostasis in selected patients. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:10:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f10d94bf497a4ceea27beeadc30d2f20 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1305-3825 1305-3612 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:10:40Z |
publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing House |
record_format | Article |
series | Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology |
spelling | doaj.art-f10d94bf497a4ceea27beeadc30d2f202023-09-06T13:29:34ZengGalenos Publishing HouseDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology1305-38251305-36122017-01-01231495410.5152/dir.2016.1545113049054Usefulness and safety of the “God’s Hand” pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in femoral catheterizationSungwon Kim0Jae Hyun Kwon1Yoon Hee Han2Jeung Sook Kim3 Department of Radiology, Dongguk University Graduate School of Medicine, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea Department of Radiology, Dongguk University Graduate School of Medicine, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea Department of Radiology, Dongguk University Graduate School of Medicine, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea Department of Radiology, Dongguk University Graduate School of Medicine, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea PURPOSE :We aimed to assess the usefulness and safety of the God’s Hand pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in patients undergoing percutaneous endovascular procedures via femoral artery.METHODS:Two hundred thirty-seven patients in whom hemostasis of femoral catheterization was achieved using a God’s Hand pneumatic compression device were enrolled. The patients were divided into group A, those in whom the device was applied for four hours, and group B, those in whom the device was applied for two hours, with an additional two hours of bed rest in both groups. Groups A and B were regrouped to groups A’ and B’ using the propensity score matching method (n=65, for both). Chi-squared test and logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between the complication rate and patient characteristics and procedure-related factors.RESULTS:Clinical success was achieved in 216 of 237 patients (91.1%): 63 in group A (84%) and 153 in group B (94.4%); in propensity score matched groups, clinical success was seen in 47 patients in group A’ (81.5%) and 62 patients in group B’ (95.4%). Group B’ showed a higher clinical success rate than group A’ (P = 0.028). There were no major complications. In logistic regression models, a negative association was noted between the complication rate and the duration of God’s Hand application; however, this association was not statistically significant.CONCLUSION:The God’s Hand pneumatic compression device is effective and safe for the hemostasis of femoral catheterization, and four hours of bed rest is sufficient for hemostasis in selected patients. http://www.dirjournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/usefulness-and-safety-of-the-gods-hand-pneumatic-c/55363 |
spellingShingle | Sungwon Kim Jae Hyun Kwon Yoon Hee Han Jeung Sook Kim Usefulness and safety of the “God’s Hand” pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in femoral catheterization Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology |
title | Usefulness and safety of the “God’s Hand” pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in femoral catheterization |
title_full | Usefulness and safety of the “God’s Hand” pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in femoral catheterization |
title_fullStr | Usefulness and safety of the “God’s Hand” pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in femoral catheterization |
title_full_unstemmed | Usefulness and safety of the “God’s Hand” pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in femoral catheterization |
title_short | Usefulness and safety of the “God’s Hand” pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in femoral catheterization |
title_sort | usefulness and safety of the god s hand pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in femoral catheterization |
url |
http://www.dirjournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/usefulness-and-safety-of-the-gods-hand-pneumatic-c/55363
|
work_keys_str_mv | AT sungwonkim usefulnessandsafetyofthegodshandpneumaticcompressiondeviceforhemostasisinfemoralcatheterization AT jaehyunkwon usefulnessandsafetyofthegodshandpneumaticcompressiondeviceforhemostasisinfemoralcatheterization AT yoonheehan usefulnessandsafetyofthegodshandpneumaticcompressiondeviceforhemostasisinfemoralcatheterization AT jeungsookkim usefulnessandsafetyofthegodshandpneumaticcompressiondeviceforhemostasisinfemoralcatheterization |