Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up

Objective To compare medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of primary unilateral uncemented (UN) or cemented (CE) femoral component total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Methods Consecutive patients with osteoporosis who underwent primary unilateral UN or CE TH...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen Yang, Xiulan Han, Jie Wang, Zheng Yuan, Tao Wang, Mingdong Zhao, Guowei Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-04-01
Series:Journal of International Medical Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518825428
_version_ 1819260690422038528
author Chen Yang
Xiulan Han
Jie Wang
Zheng Yuan
Tao Wang
Mingdong Zhao
Guowei Han
author_facet Chen Yang
Xiulan Han
Jie Wang
Zheng Yuan
Tao Wang
Mingdong Zhao
Guowei Han
author_sort Chen Yang
collection DOAJ
description Objective To compare medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of primary unilateral uncemented (UN) or cemented (CE) femoral component total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Methods Consecutive patients with osteoporosis who underwent primary unilateral UN or CE THAs at our institution from 2006 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. All consecutive procedures were managed by high-volume surgeons, using UN or CE THA approaches. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively, and yearly thereafter. Patient-related functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Primary and secondary endpoints were early revision (<5 years) and functional outcome. Results In total, 496 primary unilateral THAs (CE, n = 184; UN, n = 182) were assessed with a median follow-up period of 75 months (range, 65–86 months). From 3 months after surgery to the final follow-up, HHS was consistently superior in the CE group. Respective prosthetic loosening rates in the UN and CE groups were 26.4% and 16.8% at a minimum of 5 years. There was a significant difference in rate of early revision (7.6% CE vs. 14.8% UN). Conclusion Compared with UN THA, CE THA exhibits a superior outcome in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T19:29:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f113df1d1ee144d59cc5f0411cb8c8b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0300-0605
1473-2300
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T19:29:55Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of International Medical Research
spelling doaj.art-f113df1d1ee144d59cc5f0411cb8c8b72022-12-21T17:33:57ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of International Medical Research0300-06051473-23002019-04-014710.1177/0300060518825428Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-upChen YangXiulan HanJie WangZheng YuanTao WangMingdong ZhaoGuowei HanObjective To compare medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of primary unilateral uncemented (UN) or cemented (CE) femoral component total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Methods Consecutive patients with osteoporosis who underwent primary unilateral UN or CE THAs at our institution from 2006 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. All consecutive procedures were managed by high-volume surgeons, using UN or CE THA approaches. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively, and yearly thereafter. Patient-related functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Primary and secondary endpoints were early revision (<5 years) and functional outcome. Results In total, 496 primary unilateral THAs (CE, n = 184; UN, n = 182) were assessed with a median follow-up period of 75 months (range, 65–86 months). From 3 months after surgery to the final follow-up, HHS was consistently superior in the CE group. Respective prosthetic loosening rates in the UN and CE groups were 26.4% and 16.8% at a minimum of 5 years. There was a significant difference in rate of early revision (7.6% CE vs. 14.8% UN). Conclusion Compared with UN THA, CE THA exhibits a superior outcome in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis.https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518825428
spellingShingle Chen Yang
Xiulan Han
Jie Wang
Zheng Yuan
Tao Wang
Mingdong Zhao
Guowei Han
Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
Journal of International Medical Research
title Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
title_full Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
title_fullStr Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
title_short Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
title_sort cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis retrospective analysis with 5 year follow up
url https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518825428
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyang cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT xiulanhan cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT jiewang cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT zhengyuan cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT taowang cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT mingdongzhao cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT guoweihan cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup