Memahami Al-Ghazzali: Jawaban atas Kritik Skeptisisme dan Inkonsistensi
Al-Ghazali is one of the greatest Muslim scholars. He is known as Hujjah al-Islām because of his success in defending Islamic orthodoxy in the face of heretical groups. However, Al-Ghazali is also not free from controversy. Among these criticisms is that Al-Ghazali had experienced a period of skept...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
LP2M Insuri Ponorogo
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/adabiya/article/view/2404 |
| _version_ | 1797851007114280960 |
|---|---|
| author | Kurniawan Dwi Saputra |
| author_facet | Kurniawan Dwi Saputra |
| author_sort | Kurniawan Dwi Saputra |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Al-Ghazali is one of the greatest Muslim scholars. He is known as Hujjah al-Islām because of his success in defending Islamic orthodoxy in the face of heretical groups. However, Al-Ghazali is also not free from controversy. Among these criticisms is that Al-Ghazali had experienced a period of skepticism and inconsistent thinking. This research attempts to analyze Al-Ghazali's works and secondary books that explain Al-Ghazali's thoughts. This study uses a qualitative approach to the type of literature research. The topic of this research is the controversy surrounding skepticism and accusations of inconsistency in Al-Ghazali's thought. The steps in this study include topic selection, information exploration, focus determination, data collection, data presentation, and report preparation. The results of this study suggest that Al-Ghazali's skeptical period was not a problem because it happened in a short time and he did not produce any papers. The problem of Al-Ghazali's inconsistency arises because of the many works attributed to him but not actually Al-Ghazali's work or because of the different readers intended by Al-Ghazali in his different books, as stated by Dunya. In conclusion, this study argues that a comprehensive reading of Al-Ghazali's work is needed to provide a complete picture of Al-Ghazali's figure and the extent to which his works are devoted.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T19:09:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f11484e4997c476b91087112e8a6d0f4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1907-1191 2540-9204 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T19:09:47Z |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | LP2M Insuri Ponorogo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan |
| spelling | doaj.art-f11484e4997c476b91087112e8a6d0f42023-04-07T03:03:37ZengLP2M Insuri PonorogoAl-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan1907-11912540-92042022-12-0117210.37680/adabiya.v17i2.2404Memahami Al-Ghazzali: Jawaban atas Kritik Skeptisisme dan InkonsistensiKurniawan Dwi Saputra0Faculty of Islamic Studies, Indonesian Islamic University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Al-Ghazali is one of the greatest Muslim scholars. He is known as Hujjah al-Islām because of his success in defending Islamic orthodoxy in the face of heretical groups. However, Al-Ghazali is also not free from controversy. Among these criticisms is that Al-Ghazali had experienced a period of skepticism and inconsistent thinking. This research attempts to analyze Al-Ghazali's works and secondary books that explain Al-Ghazali's thoughts. This study uses a qualitative approach to the type of literature research. The topic of this research is the controversy surrounding skepticism and accusations of inconsistency in Al-Ghazali's thought. The steps in this study include topic selection, information exploration, focus determination, data collection, data presentation, and report preparation. The results of this study suggest that Al-Ghazali's skeptical period was not a problem because it happened in a short time and he did not produce any papers. The problem of Al-Ghazali's inconsistency arises because of the many works attributed to him but not actually Al-Ghazali's work or because of the different readers intended by Al-Ghazali in his different books, as stated by Dunya. In conclusion, this study argues that a comprehensive reading of Al-Ghazali's work is needed to provide a complete picture of Al-Ghazali's figure and the extent to which his works are devoted. https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/adabiya/article/view/2404Al-Ghazalicritiqueinconsistencyskepticism |
| spellingShingle | Kurniawan Dwi Saputra Memahami Al-Ghazzali: Jawaban atas Kritik Skeptisisme dan Inkonsistensi Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan Al-Ghazali critique inconsistency skepticism |
| title | Memahami Al-Ghazzali: Jawaban atas Kritik Skeptisisme dan Inkonsistensi |
| title_full | Memahami Al-Ghazzali: Jawaban atas Kritik Skeptisisme dan Inkonsistensi |
| title_fullStr | Memahami Al-Ghazzali: Jawaban atas Kritik Skeptisisme dan Inkonsistensi |
| title_full_unstemmed | Memahami Al-Ghazzali: Jawaban atas Kritik Skeptisisme dan Inkonsistensi |
| title_short | Memahami Al-Ghazzali: Jawaban atas Kritik Skeptisisme dan Inkonsistensi |
| title_sort | memahami al ghazzali jawaban atas kritik skeptisisme dan inkonsistensi |
| topic | Al-Ghazali critique inconsistency skepticism |
| url | https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/adabiya/article/view/2404 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kurniawandwisaputra memahamialghazzalijawabanataskritikskeptisismedaninkonsistensi |