Molecular Characterization of HOXA2 and HOXA3 Binding Properties

The highly conserved HOX homeodomain (HD) transcription factors (TFs) establish the identity of different body parts along the antero–posterior axis of bilaterian animals. Segment diversification and the morphogenesis of different structures is achieved by generating precise patterns of HOX expressi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joshua Mallen, Manisha Kalsan, Peyman Zarrineh, Laure Bridoux, Shandar Ahmad, Nicoletta Bobola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Journal of Developmental Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2221-3759/9/4/55
_version_ 1827671900227108864
author Joshua Mallen
Manisha Kalsan
Peyman Zarrineh
Laure Bridoux
Shandar Ahmad
Nicoletta Bobola
author_facet Joshua Mallen
Manisha Kalsan
Peyman Zarrineh
Laure Bridoux
Shandar Ahmad
Nicoletta Bobola
author_sort Joshua Mallen
collection DOAJ
description The highly conserved HOX homeodomain (HD) transcription factors (TFs) establish the identity of different body parts along the antero–posterior axis of bilaterian animals. Segment diversification and the morphogenesis of different structures is achieved by generating precise patterns of HOX expression along the antero–posterior axis and by the ability of different HOX TFs to instruct unique and specific transcriptional programs. However, HOX binding properties in vitro, characterised by the recognition of similar AT-rich binding sequences, do not account for the ability of different HOX to instruct segment-specific transcriptional programs. To address this problem, we previously compared HOXA2 and HOXA3 binding in vivo. Here, we explore if sequence motif enrichments observed in vivo are explained by binding affinities in vitro. Unexpectedly, we found that the highest enriched motif in HOXA2 peaks was not recognised by HOXA2 in vitro, highlighting the importance of investigating HOX binding in its physiological context. We also report the ability of HOXA2 and HOXA3 to heterodimerise, which may have functional consequences for the HOX patterning function in vivo.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:50:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f117748cb7784d18b8066d41e764ad9a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2221-3759
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:50:16Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Developmental Biology
spelling doaj.art-f117748cb7784d18b8066d41e764ad9a2023-11-23T08:59:42ZengMDPI AGJournal of Developmental Biology2221-37592021-12-01945510.3390/jdb9040055Molecular Characterization of HOXA2 and HOXA3 Binding PropertiesJoshua Mallen0Manisha Kalsan1Peyman Zarrineh2Laure Bridoux3Shandar Ahmad4Nicoletta Bobola5School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UKSchool of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, IndiaSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UKLouvain Institute of Biomolecular Science and Technology, Université Catholique de Louvain, 5 (L7.07.10) Place Croix du Sud, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumSchool of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, IndiaSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UKThe highly conserved HOX homeodomain (HD) transcription factors (TFs) establish the identity of different body parts along the antero–posterior axis of bilaterian animals. Segment diversification and the morphogenesis of different structures is achieved by generating precise patterns of HOX expression along the antero–posterior axis and by the ability of different HOX TFs to instruct unique and specific transcriptional programs. However, HOX binding properties in vitro, characterised by the recognition of similar AT-rich binding sequences, do not account for the ability of different HOX to instruct segment-specific transcriptional programs. To address this problem, we previously compared HOXA2 and HOXA3 binding in vivo. Here, we explore if sequence motif enrichments observed in vivo are explained by binding affinities in vitro. Unexpectedly, we found that the highest enriched motif in HOXA2 peaks was not recognised by HOXA2 in vitro, highlighting the importance of investigating HOX binding in its physiological context. We also report the ability of HOXA2 and HOXA3 to heterodimerise, which may have functional consequences for the HOX patterning function in vivo.https://www.mdpi.com/2221-3759/9/4/55transcription factorHOXdevelopmentbranchial arches
spellingShingle Joshua Mallen
Manisha Kalsan
Peyman Zarrineh
Laure Bridoux
Shandar Ahmad
Nicoletta Bobola
Molecular Characterization of HOXA2 and HOXA3 Binding Properties
Journal of Developmental Biology
transcription factor
HOX
development
branchial arches
title Molecular Characterization of HOXA2 and HOXA3 Binding Properties
title_full Molecular Characterization of HOXA2 and HOXA3 Binding Properties
title_fullStr Molecular Characterization of HOXA2 and HOXA3 Binding Properties
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Characterization of HOXA2 and HOXA3 Binding Properties
title_short Molecular Characterization of HOXA2 and HOXA3 Binding Properties
title_sort molecular characterization of hoxa2 and hoxa3 binding properties
topic transcription factor
HOX
development
branchial arches
url https://www.mdpi.com/2221-3759/9/4/55
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuamallen molecularcharacterizationofhoxa2andhoxa3bindingproperties
AT manishakalsan molecularcharacterizationofhoxa2andhoxa3bindingproperties
AT peymanzarrineh molecularcharacterizationofhoxa2andhoxa3bindingproperties
AT laurebridoux molecularcharacterizationofhoxa2andhoxa3bindingproperties
AT shandarahmad molecularcharacterizationofhoxa2andhoxa3bindingproperties
AT nicolettabobola molecularcharacterizationofhoxa2andhoxa3bindingproperties