Managing returns to prison from medium-secure services: qualitative study

Background Little is known about factors that influence discharge decision-making for people admitted to medium-secure services from prison, particularly for those who are returned to prison following treatment. Aims To explore the organisational influences on care pathways through medium-secure se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah-Jayne Leonard, Caroline Sanders, Jennifer J. Shaw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2021-07-01
Series:BJPsych Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472421009285/type/journal_article
_version_ 1827995655372537856
author Sarah-Jayne Leonard
Caroline Sanders
Jennifer J. Shaw
author_facet Sarah-Jayne Leonard
Caroline Sanders
Jennifer J. Shaw
author_sort Sarah-Jayne Leonard
collection DOAJ
description Background Little is known about factors that influence discharge decision-making for people admitted to medium-secure services from prison, particularly for those who are returned to prison following treatment. Aims To explore the organisational influences on care pathways through medium-secure services for those admitted from prison. Method We recruited 24 clinicians via purposive and snowball sampling; 13 shared their experiences via a focus group, and 11 shared their experiences via individual semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis was conducted, producing three overarching themes: maintenance of throughput and service provision, class of two systems, and desirable and undesirable patients. Results Data indicated external factors that direct and, at times, limit clinicians’ pathway decisions, including commissioning criteria and legal status under the Mental Health Act 1983 and within the criminal courts system (i.e. whether on remand or sentenced). These factors also influence how clinicians view the role and function of medium-secure services within the wider forensic mental health system, and therefore the types of patients that are deemed ‘appropriate’ for continued treatment when making discretionary pathway decisions. Conclusions There remains a deficit in adequate resources to meet the mental health needs of prisoners who are admitted to medium-secure services. To meet the clinical need of all admissions, criteria for prolonged treatment in medium-secure services needs to be reconsidered, and it is likely that provision for the medium-secure hospital estate will need to increase substantially if effective rehabilitation of those who transfer from prison is to take place.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:59:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f132fdc9ab9842329006efccce1a54a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-4724
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:59:43Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series BJPsych Open
spelling doaj.art-f132fdc9ab9842329006efccce1a54a32023-03-09T12:29:07ZengCambridge University PressBJPsych Open2056-47242021-07-01710.1192/bjo.2021.928Managing returns to prison from medium-secure services: qualitative studySarah-Jayne Leonard0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1729-0556Caroline Sanders1Jennifer J. Shaw2Offender Health Research Network, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, UKNIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, UKCentre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, UKBackground Little is known about factors that influence discharge decision-making for people admitted to medium-secure services from prison, particularly for those who are returned to prison following treatment. Aims To explore the organisational influences on care pathways through medium-secure services for those admitted from prison. Method We recruited 24 clinicians via purposive and snowball sampling; 13 shared their experiences via a focus group, and 11 shared their experiences via individual semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis was conducted, producing three overarching themes: maintenance of throughput and service provision, class of two systems, and desirable and undesirable patients. Results Data indicated external factors that direct and, at times, limit clinicians’ pathway decisions, including commissioning criteria and legal status under the Mental Health Act 1983 and within the criminal courts system (i.e. whether on remand or sentenced). These factors also influence how clinicians view the role and function of medium-secure services within the wider forensic mental health system, and therefore the types of patients that are deemed ‘appropriate’ for continued treatment when making discretionary pathway decisions. Conclusions There remains a deficit in adequate resources to meet the mental health needs of prisoners who are admitted to medium-secure services. To meet the clinical need of all admissions, criteria for prolonged treatment in medium-secure services needs to be reconsidered, and it is likely that provision for the medium-secure hospital estate will need to increase substantially if effective rehabilitation of those who transfer from prison is to take place. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472421009285/type/journal_articleForensic mental health servicesprison mental healthoffender pathwaysecure services
spellingShingle Sarah-Jayne Leonard
Caroline Sanders
Jennifer J. Shaw
Managing returns to prison from medium-secure services: qualitative study
BJPsych Open
Forensic mental health services
prison mental health
offender pathway
secure services
title Managing returns to prison from medium-secure services: qualitative study
title_full Managing returns to prison from medium-secure services: qualitative study
title_fullStr Managing returns to prison from medium-secure services: qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Managing returns to prison from medium-secure services: qualitative study
title_short Managing returns to prison from medium-secure services: qualitative study
title_sort managing returns to prison from medium secure services qualitative study
topic Forensic mental health services
prison mental health
offender pathway
secure services
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472421009285/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahjayneleonard managingreturnstoprisonfrommediumsecureservicesqualitativestudy
AT carolinesanders managingreturnstoprisonfrommediumsecureservicesqualitativestudy
AT jenniferjshaw managingreturnstoprisonfrommediumsecureservicesqualitativestudy