valuation of Subclinical Multiple Sclerosis Patients Using Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials and Visual Field Test
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate subclinical multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with normal visual acuity using pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) test and central 30-2 threshold visual field (VF) test. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients, 30 of which had a definitive...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Galenos Yayinevi
2014-05-01
|
| Series: | Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.oftalmoloji.org/article_6093/Evaluation-Of-Subclinical-Multiple-Sclerosis-Patients-Using-Pattern-Visual-Evoked-Potentials-And-Visual-Field-Test |
| _version_ | 1797913162578657280 |
|---|---|
| author | Sinan Bilgin Süleyman Sami İlker Ercüment Çavdar |
| author_facet | Sinan Bilgin Süleyman Sami İlker Ercüment Çavdar |
| author_sort | Sinan Bilgin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate subclinical multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with normal visual acuity using pattern
visual evoked potentials (PVEP) test and central 30-2 threshold visual field (VF) test.
Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients, 30 of which had a definitive MS diagnosis and 30 who were healthy volunteers, were
included in the study. The participants were divided into the following three groups: Group 1 - optic neuritis (+) MS patients, Group
2 - optic neuritis (-) MS patients, and Group 3 - control group. Using white on white perimetry, SITA FAST central 30-2 threshold VF
tests and 1˚-0.3˚ PVEP measurements were performed. MD, PSD, p100 latency (ms), p100 amplitude (µV), and central 0-10˚, 0-20˚,
0-30˚, 10-20˚, 10-30˚, 20-30˚ retina sensitivities (db) were evaluated in all groups.
Results: There was a significant difference in all parameters between Group 1 and Group 3 (p<0.05). There was a significant difference
in p100 latency 1˚- 0.3˚, p100 amplitude 0.3˚, central 0-30˚, 10-30˚, 20-30˚ between Group 2 and Group 3 (p<0.05). There was no
significant difference in the parameters except for p100 amplitude 1˚ between Group 1 and Group 2 (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The evaluation of PVEP and central 30˚ VF can be used to monitor disease prognosis in subclinical MS patients. (Turk
J Ophthalmol 2014; 44: 207-11) |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T12:08:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f1489939d2ef4ce7aa0a43887877e5e1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1300-0659 2147-2661 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T12:08:37Z |
| publishDate | 2014-05-01 |
| publisher | Galenos Yayinevi |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi |
| spelling | doaj.art-f1489939d2ef4ce7aa0a43887877e5e12023-02-15T16:16:08ZengGalenos YayineviTürk Oftalmoloji Dergisi1300-06592147-26612014-05-0144320721110.4274/tjo.75983valuation of Subclinical Multiple Sclerosis Patients Using Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials and Visual Field TestSinan Bilgin0 Süleyman Sami İlker1Ercüment Çavdar2Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Manisa, TürkiyeCelal Bayar Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Manisa, TürkiyeKemal Paşa Devlet Hastanesi, Göz Hastalıkları Kliniği, İzmir, TürkiyeObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate subclinical multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with normal visual acuity using pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) test and central 30-2 threshold visual field (VF) test. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients, 30 of which had a definitive MS diagnosis and 30 who were healthy volunteers, were included in the study. The participants were divided into the following three groups: Group 1 - optic neuritis (+) MS patients, Group 2 - optic neuritis (-) MS patients, and Group 3 - control group. Using white on white perimetry, SITA FAST central 30-2 threshold VF tests and 1˚-0.3˚ PVEP measurements were performed. MD, PSD, p100 latency (ms), p100 amplitude (µV), and central 0-10˚, 0-20˚, 0-30˚, 10-20˚, 10-30˚, 20-30˚ retina sensitivities (db) were evaluated in all groups. Results: There was a significant difference in all parameters between Group 1 and Group 3 (p<0.05). There was a significant difference in p100 latency 1˚- 0.3˚, p100 amplitude 0.3˚, central 0-30˚, 10-30˚, 20-30˚ between Group 2 and Group 3 (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the parameters except for p100 amplitude 1˚ between Group 1 and Group 2 (p>0.05). Conclusion: The evaluation of PVEP and central 30˚ VF can be used to monitor disease prognosis in subclinical MS patients. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2014; 44: 207-11)http://www.oftalmoloji.org/article_6093/Evaluation-Of-Subclinical-Multiple-Sclerosis-Patients-Using-Pattern-Visual-Evoked-Potentials-And-Visual-Field-TestPattern visual evoked potentialsvisual fieldmultiple sclerosis |
| spellingShingle | Sinan Bilgin Süleyman Sami İlker Ercüment Çavdar valuation of Subclinical Multiple Sclerosis Patients Using Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials and Visual Field Test Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi Pattern visual evoked potentials visual field multiple sclerosis |
| title | valuation of Subclinical Multiple Sclerosis Patients Using Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials and Visual Field Test |
| title_full | valuation of Subclinical Multiple Sclerosis Patients Using Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials and Visual Field Test |
| title_fullStr | valuation of Subclinical Multiple Sclerosis Patients Using Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials and Visual Field Test |
| title_full_unstemmed | valuation of Subclinical Multiple Sclerosis Patients Using Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials and Visual Field Test |
| title_short | valuation of Subclinical Multiple Sclerosis Patients Using Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials and Visual Field Test |
| title_sort | valuation of subclinical multiple sclerosis patients using pattern visual evoked potentials and visual field test |
| topic | Pattern visual evoked potentials visual field multiple sclerosis |
| url | http://www.oftalmoloji.org/article_6093/Evaluation-Of-Subclinical-Multiple-Sclerosis-Patients-Using-Pattern-Visual-Evoked-Potentials-And-Visual-Field-Test |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sinanbilgin valuationofsubclinicalmultiplesclerosispatientsusingpatternvisualevokedpotentialsandvisualfieldtest AT suleymansamiilker valuationofsubclinicalmultiplesclerosispatientsusingpatternvisualevokedpotentialsandvisualfieldtest AT ercumentcavdar valuationofsubclinicalmultiplesclerosispatientsusingpatternvisualevokedpotentialsandvisualfieldtest |