Malpractice Claims in Ophthalmology: A 10-Year Review

Objectives: In the literature, there are a limited number of studies related to medical litigation in ophthalmology. We aimed to reveal and discuss the profile of medical malpractice claims and liability of clinicians involved in ophthalmology cases. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively revie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehmet Hakan Özdemir, İsmail Özgür Can, Nilüfer Koçak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2014-01-01
Series:Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.oftalmoloji.org/article_2345/Malpractice-Claims-In-Ophthalmology-A-10-year-Review
_version_ 1797918042011729920
author Mehmet Hakan Özdemir
İsmail Özgür Can
Nilüfer Koçak
author_facet Mehmet Hakan Özdemir
İsmail Özgür Can
Nilüfer Koçak
author_sort Mehmet Hakan Özdemir
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: In the literature, there are a limited number of studies related to medical litigation in ophthalmology. We aimed to reveal and discuss the profile of medical malpractice claims and liability of clinicians involved in ophthalmology cases. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1531 malpractice claims reported by the Supreme Health Council of Turkey between 1991 and 2000; 59 (3.85%) were related to ophthalmology, and 57 cases could be included in the study. Data including patients’ age, sex, diagnoses, and malpractice claims of judgment, distribution of ophthalmologic subspecialties and results of surgical/medical interventions, and the distribution of liability of health workers in these reports were collected. Results: Most frequently encountered ophthalmologic events which resulted in malpractice claims were: cataract surgery ranked first with 19 malpractice claims (33.3%) followed by traumatic injuries of the eye (15.8%), and erroneous reporting (15.8%). Health personnel were found at fault in 38.6% of the claims. Of the cases, 36.8% were placed in private clinics and hospitals. Lack of care was mostly observed in state hospitals than in private ones. Medicolegal autopsy was performed on 6 of the cases among 8 deaths. Conclusion: These findings would contribute to the data about the profile of medical malpractice claims related to ophthalmology. Revealing the data could be helpful for preventing malpractice claims and faults at similar medical conditions. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2014; 44: 1-5)
first_indexed 2024-04-10T13:23:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f14a12b739aa40fb96aefdea5c5cae29
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1300-0659
2147-2661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T13:23:07Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi
spelling doaj.art-f14a12b739aa40fb96aefdea5c5cae292023-02-15T16:11:58ZengGalenos YayineviTürk Oftalmoloji Dergisi1300-06592147-26612014-01-014411510.4274/tjo.83584Malpractice Claims in Ophthalmology: A 10-Year ReviewMehmet Hakan Özdemir0İsmail Özgür Can1Nilüfer Koçak2Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Department of Forensic Medicine, İzmir, TurkeyDokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Department of Forensic Medicine, İzmir, TurkeyDokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, TurkeyObjectives: In the literature, there are a limited number of studies related to medical litigation in ophthalmology. We aimed to reveal and discuss the profile of medical malpractice claims and liability of clinicians involved in ophthalmology cases. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1531 malpractice claims reported by the Supreme Health Council of Turkey between 1991 and 2000; 59 (3.85%) were related to ophthalmology, and 57 cases could be included in the study. Data including patients’ age, sex, diagnoses, and malpractice claims of judgment, distribution of ophthalmologic subspecialties and results of surgical/medical interventions, and the distribution of liability of health workers in these reports were collected. Results: Most frequently encountered ophthalmologic events which resulted in malpractice claims were: cataract surgery ranked first with 19 malpractice claims (33.3%) followed by traumatic injuries of the eye (15.8%), and erroneous reporting (15.8%). Health personnel were found at fault in 38.6% of the claims. Of the cases, 36.8% were placed in private clinics and hospitals. Lack of care was mostly observed in state hospitals than in private ones. Medicolegal autopsy was performed on 6 of the cases among 8 deaths. Conclusion: These findings would contribute to the data about the profile of medical malpractice claims related to ophthalmology. Revealing the data could be helpful for preventing malpractice claims and faults at similar medical conditions. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2014; 44: 1-5)http://www.oftalmoloji.org/article_2345/Malpractice-Claims-In-Ophthalmology-A-10-year-ReviewOphthalmologymalpracticemedicolegal
spellingShingle Mehmet Hakan Özdemir
İsmail Özgür Can
Nilüfer Koçak
Malpractice Claims in Ophthalmology: A 10-Year Review
Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi
Ophthalmology
malpractice
medicolegal
title Malpractice Claims in Ophthalmology: A 10-Year Review
title_full Malpractice Claims in Ophthalmology: A 10-Year Review
title_fullStr Malpractice Claims in Ophthalmology: A 10-Year Review
title_full_unstemmed Malpractice Claims in Ophthalmology: A 10-Year Review
title_short Malpractice Claims in Ophthalmology: A 10-Year Review
title_sort malpractice claims in ophthalmology a 10 year review
topic Ophthalmology
malpractice
medicolegal
url http://www.oftalmoloji.org/article_2345/Malpractice-Claims-In-Ophthalmology-A-10-year-Review
work_keys_str_mv AT mehmethakanozdemir malpracticeclaimsinophthalmologya10yearreview
AT ismailozgurcan malpracticeclaimsinophthalmologya10yearreview
AT niluferkocak malpracticeclaimsinophthalmologya10yearreview