Punishing Genocide: A Comparative Empirical Analysis of Sentencing Laws and Practices at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), Rwandan Domestic Courts, and Gacaca Courts
This article compares sentencing of those convicted of participation in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. With over one million people facing trial, Rwanda constitutes the world’s most comprehensive case of criminal accountability after genocide and presents an important case study of punishing genocide....
Main Authors: | Barbora Hola, Hollie Nyseth Brehm |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Association of Genocide Scholars
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol10/iss3/7 |
Similar Items
-
Assembling Styles of Truth in Rwanda’s Gacaca Process
by: Bert Ingelaere
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Rwanda’s Inyangamugayo: Perspectives from Practitioners in the Gacaca Transitional Justice Mechanism
by: Jean-Damascène Gasanabo, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Trust, Individual Guilt, Collective Guilt and Dispositions Toward Reconciliation Among Rwandan Survivors and Prisoners Before and After Their Participation in Postgenocide Gacaca Courts in Rwanda
by: Patrick Kanyangara, et al.
Published: (2014-08-01) -
La place des témoignages de victimes dans l’historiographie du génocide des Tutsi du Rwanda
by: Hélène Dumas, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01) -
The Christian Churches, the State, and Genocide in Rwanda
by: Court, Anthony
Published: (2016-12-01)