Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study

Aim: Successful root canal therapy requires an in depth knowledge of root anatomy and canal morphology. Generally the maxillary first molars have three roots and four canals. Unidentified second mesiobuccal canal may result in failure of the root canal treatment in maxillary first molar. The aim of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S Sunil Kumar, T Rambabu, Girija S Sajjan, V S Sashikanth, B Lakshmi, V Rajasekhar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Advances in Human Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2015;volume=5;issue=3;spage=43;epage=48;aulast=Kumar;type=0
_version_ 1811196238614233088
author S Sunil Kumar
T Rambabu
Girija S Sajjan
V S Sashikanth
B Lakshmi
V Rajasekhar
author_facet S Sunil Kumar
T Rambabu
Girija S Sajjan
V S Sashikanth
B Lakshmi
V Rajasekhar
author_sort S Sunil Kumar
collection DOAJ
description Aim: Successful root canal therapy requires an in depth knowledge of root anatomy and canal morphology. Generally the maxillary first molars have three roots and four canals. Unidentified second mesiobuccal canal may result in failure of the root canal treatment in maxillary first molar. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of dentist with unaided eye(UAE), assisted with surgical loupes (SL) or Dental Operating Microscope (DOM) in locating second canal in the mesio buccal root of the maxillary first molar in patients undergoing root canal treatment. Materials & Method : Access cavity preparation was done for maxillary first molars in 50 patients. A thorough visual examination to locate the second mesio buccal canal was carried out. If canal was not identified, further evaluation was done with SL. If canal was not found under SL, then DOM was used. In each method appropriate irrigation, lubrication, exploration and negotiation of the canal was performed with required armamentarium. Photographic documentation and multiple angled radiographs were taken. Results: Out of 50 patients, second mesiobuccal canal was located in 11 patients with UAE, 20 with surgical loupes, 37 under Dental Operating Microscope. DOM showed statistically significant difference in comparison with SL and UAE. SL showed no statistically difference in comparison with UAE. Conclusion : The use of DOM proved to be a better aid in location of the second mesio buccal canal than SL and UAE.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:56:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f14d9a4df07e408781f19617488db436
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2321-8568
2348-4691
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:56:16Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Advances in Human Biology
spelling doaj.art-f14d9a4df07e408781f19617488db4362022-12-22T03:54:37ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAdvances in Human Biology2321-85682348-46912015-01-01534348Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo StudyS Sunil KumarT RambabuGirija S SajjanV S SashikanthB LakshmiV RajasekharAim: Successful root canal therapy requires an in depth knowledge of root anatomy and canal morphology. Generally the maxillary first molars have three roots and four canals. Unidentified second mesiobuccal canal may result in failure of the root canal treatment in maxillary first molar. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of dentist with unaided eye(UAE), assisted with surgical loupes (SL) or Dental Operating Microscope (DOM) in locating second canal in the mesio buccal root of the maxillary first molar in patients undergoing root canal treatment. Materials & Method : Access cavity preparation was done for maxillary first molars in 50 patients. A thorough visual examination to locate the second mesio buccal canal was carried out. If canal was not identified, further evaluation was done with SL. If canal was not found under SL, then DOM was used. In each method appropriate irrigation, lubrication, exploration and negotiation of the canal was performed with required armamentarium. Photographic documentation and multiple angled radiographs were taken. Results: Out of 50 patients, second mesiobuccal canal was located in 11 patients with UAE, 20 with surgical loupes, 37 under Dental Operating Microscope. DOM showed statistically significant difference in comparison with SL and UAE. SL showed no statistically difference in comparison with UAE. Conclusion : The use of DOM proved to be a better aid in location of the second mesio buccal canal than SL and UAE.http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2015;volume=5;issue=3;spage=43;epage=48;aulast=Kumar;type=0Maxillary first molarunaided Eye (UAE)surgical loupes (SL)Dental Operating Microscope (DOM).
spellingShingle S Sunil Kumar
T Rambabu
Girija S Sajjan
V S Sashikanth
B Lakshmi
V Rajasekhar
Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study
Advances in Human Biology
Maxillary first molar
unaided Eye (UAE)
surgical loupes (SL)
Dental Operating Microscope (DOM).
title Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study
title_full Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study
title_fullStr Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study
title_short Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study
title_sort detection of second mesio buccal canal in maxillary first molar with unaided eye surgical loupes and dental operating microscope a comparative invivo study
topic Maxillary first molar
unaided Eye (UAE)
surgical loupes (SL)
Dental Operating Microscope (DOM).
url http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2015;volume=5;issue=3;spage=43;epage=48;aulast=Kumar;type=0
work_keys_str_mv AT ssunilkumar detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy
AT trambabu detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy
AT girijassajjan detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy
AT vssashikanth detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy
AT blakshmi detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy
AT vrajasekhar detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy