Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study
Aim: Successful root canal therapy requires an in depth knowledge of root anatomy and canal morphology. Generally the maxillary first molars have three roots and four canals. Unidentified second mesiobuccal canal may result in failure of the root canal treatment in maxillary first molar. The aim of...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Human Biology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2015;volume=5;issue=3;spage=43;epage=48;aulast=Kumar;type=0 |
_version_ | 1811196238614233088 |
---|---|
author | S Sunil Kumar T Rambabu Girija S Sajjan V S Sashikanth B Lakshmi V Rajasekhar |
author_facet | S Sunil Kumar T Rambabu Girija S Sajjan V S Sashikanth B Lakshmi V Rajasekhar |
author_sort | S Sunil Kumar |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aim: Successful root canal therapy requires an in depth knowledge of root anatomy and canal morphology. Generally the maxillary first molars have three roots and four canals. Unidentified second mesiobuccal canal may result in failure of the root canal treatment in maxillary first molar. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of dentist with unaided eye(UAE), assisted with surgical loupes (SL) or Dental Operating Microscope (DOM) in locating second canal in the mesio buccal root of the maxillary first molar in patients undergoing root canal treatment.
Materials & Method : Access cavity preparation was done for maxillary first molars in 50 patients. A thorough visual examination to locate the second mesio buccal canal was carried out. If canal was not identified, further evaluation was done with SL. If canal was not found under SL, then DOM was used. In each method appropriate irrigation, lubrication, exploration and negotiation of the canal was performed with required armamentarium. Photographic documentation and multiple angled radiographs were taken.
Results: Out of 50 patients, second mesiobuccal canal was located in 11 patients with UAE, 20 with surgical loupes, 37 under Dental Operating Microscope. DOM showed statistically significant difference in comparison with SL and UAE. SL showed no statistically difference in comparison with UAE.
Conclusion : The use of DOM proved to be a better aid in location of the second mesio buccal canal than SL and UAE. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:56:16Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f14d9a4df07e408781f19617488db436 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2321-8568 2348-4691 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:56:16Z |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Advances in Human Biology |
spelling | doaj.art-f14d9a4df07e408781f19617488db4362022-12-22T03:54:37ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAdvances in Human Biology2321-85682348-46912015-01-01534348Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo StudyS Sunil KumarT RambabuGirija S SajjanV S SashikanthB LakshmiV RajasekharAim: Successful root canal therapy requires an in depth knowledge of root anatomy and canal morphology. Generally the maxillary first molars have three roots and four canals. Unidentified second mesiobuccal canal may result in failure of the root canal treatment in maxillary first molar. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of dentist with unaided eye(UAE), assisted with surgical loupes (SL) or Dental Operating Microscope (DOM) in locating second canal in the mesio buccal root of the maxillary first molar in patients undergoing root canal treatment. Materials & Method : Access cavity preparation was done for maxillary first molars in 50 patients. A thorough visual examination to locate the second mesio buccal canal was carried out. If canal was not identified, further evaluation was done with SL. If canal was not found under SL, then DOM was used. In each method appropriate irrigation, lubrication, exploration and negotiation of the canal was performed with required armamentarium. Photographic documentation and multiple angled radiographs were taken. Results: Out of 50 patients, second mesiobuccal canal was located in 11 patients with UAE, 20 with surgical loupes, 37 under Dental Operating Microscope. DOM showed statistically significant difference in comparison with SL and UAE. SL showed no statistically difference in comparison with UAE. Conclusion : The use of DOM proved to be a better aid in location of the second mesio buccal canal than SL and UAE.http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2015;volume=5;issue=3;spage=43;epage=48;aulast=Kumar;type=0Maxillary first molarunaided Eye (UAE)surgical loupes (SL)Dental Operating Microscope (DOM). |
spellingShingle | S Sunil Kumar T Rambabu Girija S Sajjan V S Sashikanth B Lakshmi V Rajasekhar Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study Advances in Human Biology Maxillary first molar unaided Eye (UAE) surgical loupes (SL) Dental Operating Microscope (DOM). |
title | Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study |
title_full | Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study |
title_fullStr | Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study |
title_short | Detection of Second Mesio Buccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar with Unaided Eye, Surgical Loupes and Dental Operating Microscope: A Comparative Invivo Study |
title_sort | detection of second mesio buccal canal in maxillary first molar with unaided eye surgical loupes and dental operating microscope a comparative invivo study |
topic | Maxillary first molar unaided Eye (UAE) surgical loupes (SL) Dental Operating Microscope (DOM). |
url | http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2015;volume=5;issue=3;spage=43;epage=48;aulast=Kumar;type=0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ssunilkumar detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy AT trambabu detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy AT girijassajjan detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy AT vssashikanth detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy AT blakshmi detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy AT vrajasekhar detectionofsecondmesiobuccalcanalinmaxillaryfirstmolarwithunaidedeyesurgicalloupesanddentaloperatingmicroscopeacomparativeinvivostudy |