Restorative proctocolectomy - a nine year experience at the King Faisal specialist hospital

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) are relatively uncommon in Gulf Arabs. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a surgical method for treating patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and FAP. This paper documents...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Isbister William
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2000-01-01
Series:The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2000;volume=6;issue=3;spage=147;epage=152;aulast=Isbister
_version_ 1811236093395206144
author Isbister William
author_facet Isbister William
author_sort Isbister William
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) are relatively uncommon in Gulf Arabs. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a surgical method for treating patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and FAP. This paper documents a small experience with this operation in Saudi Arabia. Methods: The charts of all patients who had either MUC or FAP and in whom an IPAA had been performed were identified and were examined in order to determine patient demographics, timing and staging of operation, operative and long term morbidity and mortality and pouch function. Results: Thirty patients underwent IPAA. There were 16 males. 29 pouches were J-pouches. 1 patient was lost to follow up. Surgery was performed for fulminating MUC in 9 patients, failed medical treatment in 12, FAP in 7 and megacolon in 2. An emergency-three stage IPAA was performed in 10 patients. 3 patients received perioperative TPN. 17 were on steroid medication. 12 developed transient anastomotic stricture. 8 developed small bowel obstruction during follow up but none needed further surgery. 1 patient developed ′pouchitis′. Two pouches were removed. The mean daily and nocturnal bowel frequency was 6 and 2 motions per day. 6 patients suffered nocturnal leakage. Conclusion: The operation of restorative proctocolectomy can be performed safely, for the few patients who needed the operation in Saudi Arabia.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T12:03:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f1598c0bdd5847b2af5a9e5fbb457187
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1319-3767
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T12:03:00Z
publishDate 2000-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-f1598c0bdd5847b2af5a9e5fbb4571872022-12-22T03:33:49ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsThe Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology1319-37672000-01-0163147152Restorative proctocolectomy - a nine year experience at the King Faisal specialist hospitalIsbister WilliamIntroduction: Inflammatory bowel disease and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) are relatively uncommon in Gulf Arabs. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a surgical method for treating patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and FAP. This paper documents a small experience with this operation in Saudi Arabia. Methods: The charts of all patients who had either MUC or FAP and in whom an IPAA had been performed were identified and were examined in order to determine patient demographics, timing and staging of operation, operative and long term morbidity and mortality and pouch function. Results: Thirty patients underwent IPAA. There were 16 males. 29 pouches were J-pouches. 1 patient was lost to follow up. Surgery was performed for fulminating MUC in 9 patients, failed medical treatment in 12, FAP in 7 and megacolon in 2. An emergency-three stage IPAA was performed in 10 patients. 3 patients received perioperative TPN. 17 were on steroid medication. 12 developed transient anastomotic stricture. 8 developed small bowel obstruction during follow up but none needed further surgery. 1 patient developed ′pouchitis′. Two pouches were removed. The mean daily and nocturnal bowel frequency was 6 and 2 motions per day. 6 patients suffered nocturnal leakage. Conclusion: The operation of restorative proctocolectomy can be performed safely, for the few patients who needed the operation in Saudi Arabia.http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2000;volume=6;issue=3;spage=147;epage=152;aulast=IsbisterMucosal ulcerative colitisFamilial Adenomatous Polyposisrestorative proctocolectomy
spellingShingle Isbister William
Restorative proctocolectomy - a nine year experience at the King Faisal specialist hospital
The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Mucosal ulcerative colitis
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
restorative proctocolectomy
title Restorative proctocolectomy - a nine year experience at the King Faisal specialist hospital
title_full Restorative proctocolectomy - a nine year experience at the King Faisal specialist hospital
title_fullStr Restorative proctocolectomy - a nine year experience at the King Faisal specialist hospital
title_full_unstemmed Restorative proctocolectomy - a nine year experience at the King Faisal specialist hospital
title_short Restorative proctocolectomy - a nine year experience at the King Faisal specialist hospital
title_sort restorative proctocolectomy a nine year experience at the king faisal specialist hospital
topic Mucosal ulcerative colitis
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
restorative proctocolectomy
url http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2000;volume=6;issue=3;spage=147;epage=152;aulast=Isbister
work_keys_str_mv AT isbisterwilliam restorativeproctocolectomyanineyearexperienceatthekingfaisalspecialisthospital