Validation of New Methods of Using Simulated Whole-Body Movements as Implicit Indicators of Sound and Odor Preferences

Would you get close to a stinky perfume bottle or to a loudspeaker producing noise? In this paper, we present two procedures that allowed us to assess the ability of auditory and olfactory cues to elicit automatic approach/avoidance reactions toward their sources. The procedures resulted from an ada...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Donato Cereghetti, Pauline Faye, Laetitia Gros, Lucas Mahé, Emmanuelle Diaz, Isabelle Cayeux, Théo Heritier, Rémy Versace
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659269/full
_version_ 1797951622502940672
author Donato Cereghetti
Donato Cereghetti
Pauline Faye
Laetitia Gros
Laetitia Gros
Lucas Mahé
Lucas Mahé
Emmanuelle Diaz
Emmanuelle Diaz
Isabelle Cayeux
Isabelle Cayeux
Théo Heritier
Théo Heritier
Théo Heritier
Rémy Versace
Rémy Versace
author_facet Donato Cereghetti
Donato Cereghetti
Pauline Faye
Laetitia Gros
Laetitia Gros
Lucas Mahé
Lucas Mahé
Emmanuelle Diaz
Emmanuelle Diaz
Isabelle Cayeux
Isabelle Cayeux
Théo Heritier
Théo Heritier
Théo Heritier
Rémy Versace
Rémy Versace
author_sort Donato Cereghetti
collection DOAJ
description Would you get close to a stinky perfume bottle or to a loudspeaker producing noise? In this paper, we present two procedures that allowed us to assess the ability of auditory and olfactory cues to elicit automatic approach/avoidance reactions toward their sources. The procedures resulted from an adaptation of the Visual Approach/Avoidance by the Self Task (VAAST; Rougier et al., 2018), a task having the peculiarity of simulating approach/avoidance reactions by using visual feedback coming from the whole-body movements. In the auditory VAAST (Experiment 1), participants were instructed to move forward or backward from a loudspeaker that produced spoken words differentiated by their level of distortion and thus by their hedonic value. In the olfactory VAAST (Experiment 2), participants were asked to move forward or backward from a perfume bottle that delivered pleasant and unpleasant odors. We expected, consistent with the approach/avoidance compatibility effect, shorter latencies for approaching positive stimuli and avoiding negative stimuli. In both experiments, we found an effect of the quality of the emotional stimulus on forward actions of participants, with undistorted words and pleasant odors inducing faster forward movements compared with that for distorted words and unpleasant odors. Notably, our results further suggest that the VAAST can successfully be used with implicit instructions, i.e., without requiring participants to explicitly process the valence of the emotional stimulus (in Experiment 1) or even the emotional stimulus itself (in Experiment 2). The sensitivity of our procedures is analyzed and its potential in cross-modal and (contextualized) consumer research discussed.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:33:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f164eb4803b449d088dd595433d95536
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:33:28Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-f164eb4803b449d088dd595433d955362023-01-16T17:03:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-08-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.659269659269Validation of New Methods of Using Simulated Whole-Body Movements as Implicit Indicators of Sound and Odor PreferencesDonato Cereghetti0Donato Cereghetti1Pauline Faye2Laetitia Gros3Laetitia Gros4Lucas Mahé5Lucas Mahé6Emmanuelle Diaz7Emmanuelle Diaz8Isabelle Cayeux9Isabelle Cayeux10Théo Heritier11Théo Heritier12Théo Heritier13Rémy Versace14Rémy Versace15Firmenich SA, Geneva, SwitzerlandLe Sensolier, Paris, FranceLe Sensolier, Paris, FranceLe Sensolier, Paris, FranceOrange Labs, Lannion, FranceLe Sensolier, Paris, FranceEMC Laboratory, Institute of Psychology, Lyon2 University, Lyon, FranceLe Sensolier, Paris, FrancePSA Groupe, Vélizy-Villacoublay, FranceFirmenich SA, Geneva, SwitzerlandLe Sensolier, Paris, FranceLe Sensolier, Paris, FranceEMC Laboratory, Institute of Psychology, Lyon2 University, Lyon, FranceSilliker SAS, Mérieux NutriSciences, Cergy-Pontoise, FranceLe Sensolier, Paris, FranceEMC Laboratory, Institute of Psychology, Lyon2 University, Lyon, FranceWould you get close to a stinky perfume bottle or to a loudspeaker producing noise? In this paper, we present two procedures that allowed us to assess the ability of auditory and olfactory cues to elicit automatic approach/avoidance reactions toward their sources. The procedures resulted from an adaptation of the Visual Approach/Avoidance by the Self Task (VAAST; Rougier et al., 2018), a task having the peculiarity of simulating approach/avoidance reactions by using visual feedback coming from the whole-body movements. In the auditory VAAST (Experiment 1), participants were instructed to move forward or backward from a loudspeaker that produced spoken words differentiated by their level of distortion and thus by their hedonic value. In the olfactory VAAST (Experiment 2), participants were asked to move forward or backward from a perfume bottle that delivered pleasant and unpleasant odors. We expected, consistent with the approach/avoidance compatibility effect, shorter latencies for approaching positive stimuli and avoiding negative stimuli. In both experiments, we found an effect of the quality of the emotional stimulus on forward actions of participants, with undistorted words and pleasant odors inducing faster forward movements compared with that for distorted words and unpleasant odors. Notably, our results further suggest that the VAAST can successfully be used with implicit instructions, i.e., without requiring participants to explicitly process the valence of the emotional stimulus (in Experiment 1) or even the emotional stimulus itself (in Experiment 2). The sensitivity of our procedures is analyzed and its potential in cross-modal and (contextualized) consumer research discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659269/fullconsumerpreferencesmotivationapproach/avoidanceimplicit measuressounds
spellingShingle Donato Cereghetti
Donato Cereghetti
Pauline Faye
Laetitia Gros
Laetitia Gros
Lucas Mahé
Lucas Mahé
Emmanuelle Diaz
Emmanuelle Diaz
Isabelle Cayeux
Isabelle Cayeux
Théo Heritier
Théo Heritier
Théo Heritier
Rémy Versace
Rémy Versace
Validation of New Methods of Using Simulated Whole-Body Movements as Implicit Indicators of Sound and Odor Preferences
Frontiers in Psychology
consumer
preferences
motivation
approach/avoidance
implicit measures
sounds
title Validation of New Methods of Using Simulated Whole-Body Movements as Implicit Indicators of Sound and Odor Preferences
title_full Validation of New Methods of Using Simulated Whole-Body Movements as Implicit Indicators of Sound and Odor Preferences
title_fullStr Validation of New Methods of Using Simulated Whole-Body Movements as Implicit Indicators of Sound and Odor Preferences
title_full_unstemmed Validation of New Methods of Using Simulated Whole-Body Movements as Implicit Indicators of Sound and Odor Preferences
title_short Validation of New Methods of Using Simulated Whole-Body Movements as Implicit Indicators of Sound and Odor Preferences
title_sort validation of new methods of using simulated whole body movements as implicit indicators of sound and odor preferences
topic consumer
preferences
motivation
approach/avoidance
implicit measures
sounds
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659269/full
work_keys_str_mv AT donatocereghetti validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT donatocereghetti validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT paulinefaye validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT laetitiagros validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT laetitiagros validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT lucasmahe validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT lucasmahe validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT emmanuellediaz validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT emmanuellediaz validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT isabellecayeux validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT isabellecayeux validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT theoheritier validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT theoheritier validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT theoheritier validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT remyversace validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences
AT remyversace validationofnewmethodsofusingsimulatedwholebodymovementsasimplicitindicatorsofsoundandodorpreferences