Comparing industry and academia priorities in bioenergy education: a Delphi study

Bioenergy is a rapidly growing subsector of the emerging bioeconomy, with the potential to create a substantial number of jobs. However, training programmes for these positions are limited, and there is currently a lack of research-based guidance for the creation of new programmes. This study employ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kimi Grzyb, Brian D. Hartman, Katharine G. Field
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-11-01
Series:International Journal of Sustainable Energy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2017.1402769
Description
Summary:Bioenergy is a rapidly growing subsector of the emerging bioeconomy, with the potential to create a substantial number of jobs. However, training programmes for these positions are limited, and there is currently a lack of research-based guidance for the creation of new programmes. This study employed a modified, two-round Delphi technique to generate a bioenergy education framework, utilising the expertise of professionals in the field. Participants were presented with a list of bioenergy concepts and rated the importance of including each topic in a college-level bioenergy curriculum, using a five-point scale. Suggestions for additional items were requested. After receiving feedback about the panel's mean ratings from Round One, experts were again asked to rate each item. A comparison between rankings from participants in academia and industry showed that, overall, their priorities are well aligned. The resulting framework provides structure for developing standardised bioenergy workforce education programmes and appropriate evaluation instruments.
ISSN:1478-6451
1478-646X