Comparing industry and academia priorities in bioenergy education: a Delphi study
Bioenergy is a rapidly growing subsector of the emerging bioeconomy, with the potential to create a substantial number of jobs. However, training programmes for these positions are limited, and there is currently a lack of research-based guidance for the creation of new programmes. This study employ...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2018-11-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Sustainable Energy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2017.1402769 |
| _version_ | 1797680328129642496 |
|---|---|
| author | Kimi Grzyb Brian D. Hartman Katharine G. Field |
| author_facet | Kimi Grzyb Brian D. Hartman Katharine G. Field |
| author_sort | Kimi Grzyb |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Bioenergy is a rapidly growing subsector of the emerging bioeconomy, with the potential to create a substantial number of jobs. However, training programmes for these positions are limited, and there is currently a lack of research-based guidance for the creation of new programmes. This study employed a modified, two-round Delphi technique to generate a bioenergy education framework, utilising the expertise of professionals in the field. Participants were presented with a list of bioenergy concepts and rated the importance of including each topic in a college-level bioenergy curriculum, using a five-point scale. Suggestions for additional items were requested. After receiving feedback about the panel's mean ratings from Round One, experts were again asked to rate each item. A comparison between rankings from participants in academia and industry showed that, overall, their priorities are well aligned. The resulting framework provides structure for developing standardised bioenergy workforce education programmes and appropriate evaluation instruments. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T23:28:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f16b55742b594f56a8328982edbbd224 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1478-6451 1478-646X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T23:28:22Z |
| publishDate | 2018-11-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Sustainable Energy |
| spelling | doaj.art-f16b55742b594f56a8328982edbbd2242023-09-20T10:33:45ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Sustainable Energy1478-64511478-646X2018-11-01371095696910.1080/14786451.2017.14027691402769Comparing industry and academia priorities in bioenergy education: a Delphi studyKimi Grzyb0Brian D. Hartman1Katharine G. Field2Oregon State UniversityOregon State UniversityOregon State UniversityBioenergy is a rapidly growing subsector of the emerging bioeconomy, with the potential to create a substantial number of jobs. However, training programmes for these positions are limited, and there is currently a lack of research-based guidance for the creation of new programmes. This study employed a modified, two-round Delphi technique to generate a bioenergy education framework, utilising the expertise of professionals in the field. Participants were presented with a list of bioenergy concepts and rated the importance of including each topic in a college-level bioenergy curriculum, using a five-point scale. Suggestions for additional items were requested. After receiving feedback about the panel's mean ratings from Round One, experts were again asked to rate each item. A comparison between rankings from participants in academia and industry showed that, overall, their priorities are well aligned. The resulting framework provides structure for developing standardised bioenergy workforce education programmes and appropriate evaluation instruments.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2017.1402769bioenergy educationbioeconomyworkforce developmentcurriculum developmentsustainable education |
| spellingShingle | Kimi Grzyb Brian D. Hartman Katharine G. Field Comparing industry and academia priorities in bioenergy education: a Delphi study International Journal of Sustainable Energy bioenergy education bioeconomy workforce development curriculum development sustainable education |
| title | Comparing industry and academia priorities in bioenergy education: a Delphi study |
| title_full | Comparing industry and academia priorities in bioenergy education: a Delphi study |
| title_fullStr | Comparing industry and academia priorities in bioenergy education: a Delphi study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparing industry and academia priorities in bioenergy education: a Delphi study |
| title_short | Comparing industry and academia priorities in bioenergy education: a Delphi study |
| title_sort | comparing industry and academia priorities in bioenergy education a delphi study |
| topic | bioenergy education bioeconomy workforce development curriculum development sustainable education |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2017.1402769 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kimigrzyb comparingindustryandacademiaprioritiesinbioenergyeducationadelphistudy AT briandhartman comparingindustryandacademiaprioritiesinbioenergyeducationadelphistudy AT katharinegfield comparingindustryandacademiaprioritiesinbioenergyeducationadelphistudy |