Does it fit? - Trainability of affordance judgments in young and older adults.

Will I fit into the overcrowded subway? Advanced aging can change our abilities associated with accurately judging the fit between perceived environmental properties and our own actual physical capabilities (affordance judgments). Two experimental studies examined the effects of aging and trainabili...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa Finkel, Simone Engler, Jennifer Randerath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212709
_version_ 1818824281787727872
author Lisa Finkel
Simone Engler
Jennifer Randerath
author_facet Lisa Finkel
Simone Engler
Jennifer Randerath
author_sort Lisa Finkel
collection DOAJ
description Will I fit into the overcrowded subway? Advanced aging can change our abilities associated with accurately judging the fit between perceived environmental properties and our own actual physical capabilities (affordance judgments). Two experimental studies examined the effects of aging and trainability in affordance judgments. Participants were asked to decide whether their hand fits into a given opening (Aperture Task). We used a detection theory approach to evaluate different judgment characteristics. Study 1 demonstrated that older (N = 39) compared to younger adults (N = 39) produced rather conservative judgments, but did not differ in perceptual sensitivity. Distributions of Hit and False-Alarm rates, as well as risk-perception statements (DOSPERT questionnaire), indicated a heightened concern about potential consequences of misjudgments in older adults. In Study 2, 20 younger and 22 older adults were trained by actually trying to fit their hand into each presented opening. Training included acoustic, haptic and visual feedback. Compared to pre-training, both groups demonstrated significant increases in accuracy when assessed post-training and after a one-week follow-up. While younger adults improved in perceptual sensitivity in post-training as well as in follow-up, the older group adjusted their tendency towards less conservative judgments in both following sessions. Our results are consistent with affordance models that propose a complex and dynamic interplay of different neural processes involved in this skill. Future studies are needed to further elucidate that interplay and the trainability of affordance judgments.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T23:53:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f16dd97a39094770b6f795b6d333dc7d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T23:53:23Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-f16dd97a39094770b6f795b6d333dc7d2022-12-21T20:46:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01142e021270910.1371/journal.pone.0212709Does it fit? - Trainability of affordance judgments in young and older adults.Lisa FinkelSimone EnglerJennifer RanderathWill I fit into the overcrowded subway? Advanced aging can change our abilities associated with accurately judging the fit between perceived environmental properties and our own actual physical capabilities (affordance judgments). Two experimental studies examined the effects of aging and trainability in affordance judgments. Participants were asked to decide whether their hand fits into a given opening (Aperture Task). We used a detection theory approach to evaluate different judgment characteristics. Study 1 demonstrated that older (N = 39) compared to younger adults (N = 39) produced rather conservative judgments, but did not differ in perceptual sensitivity. Distributions of Hit and False-Alarm rates, as well as risk-perception statements (DOSPERT questionnaire), indicated a heightened concern about potential consequences of misjudgments in older adults. In Study 2, 20 younger and 22 older adults were trained by actually trying to fit their hand into each presented opening. Training included acoustic, haptic and visual feedback. Compared to pre-training, both groups demonstrated significant increases in accuracy when assessed post-training and after a one-week follow-up. While younger adults improved in perceptual sensitivity in post-training as well as in follow-up, the older group adjusted their tendency towards less conservative judgments in both following sessions. Our results are consistent with affordance models that propose a complex and dynamic interplay of different neural processes involved in this skill. Future studies are needed to further elucidate that interplay and the trainability of affordance judgments.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212709
spellingShingle Lisa Finkel
Simone Engler
Jennifer Randerath
Does it fit? - Trainability of affordance judgments in young and older adults.
PLoS ONE
title Does it fit? - Trainability of affordance judgments in young and older adults.
title_full Does it fit? - Trainability of affordance judgments in young and older adults.
title_fullStr Does it fit? - Trainability of affordance judgments in young and older adults.
title_full_unstemmed Does it fit? - Trainability of affordance judgments in young and older adults.
title_short Does it fit? - Trainability of affordance judgments in young and older adults.
title_sort does it fit trainability of affordance judgments in young and older adults
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212709
work_keys_str_mv AT lisafinkel doesitfittrainabilityofaffordancejudgmentsinyoungandolderadults
AT simoneengler doesitfittrainabilityofaffordancejudgmentsinyoungandolderadults
AT jenniferranderath doesitfittrainabilityofaffordancejudgmentsinyoungandolderadults