Electrowinning of Iron from Spent Leaching Solutions Using Novel Anion Exchange Membranes

In the Pyror process, electrowinning (EW) is used to recover acid and iron from spent leaching solutions (SLS), where a porous Terylene membrane acts as a separator between the cathode and anode. In this study, a novel anion exchange membrane (AEM)-based EW process is benchmarked against a process w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wouter Dirk Badenhorst, Cloete Rossouw, Hyeongrae Cho, Jochen Kerres, Dolf Bruinsma, Henning Krieg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-10-01
Series:Membranes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/9/11/137
_version_ 1797727757514309632
author Wouter Dirk Badenhorst
Cloete Rossouw
Hyeongrae Cho
Jochen Kerres
Dolf Bruinsma
Henning Krieg
author_facet Wouter Dirk Badenhorst
Cloete Rossouw
Hyeongrae Cho
Jochen Kerres
Dolf Bruinsma
Henning Krieg
author_sort Wouter Dirk Badenhorst
collection DOAJ
description In the Pyror process, electrowinning (EW) is used to recover acid and iron from spent leaching solutions (SLS), where a porous Terylene membrane acts as a separator between the cathode and anode. In this study, a novel anion exchange membrane (AEM)-based EW process is benchmarked against a process without and with a porous Terylene membrane by comparing the current efficiency, specific energy consumption (SEC), and sulfuric acid generation using an in-house constructed EW flow cell. Using an FAP-PK-130 commercial AEM, it was shown that the AEM-based process was more efficient than the traditional processes. Subsequently, 11 novel polybenzimidazole (PBI)-based blend AEMs were compared with the commercial AEM. The best performing novel AEM (BM-5), yielded a current efficiency of 95% at an SEC of 3.53 kWh/kg Fe, which is a 10% increase in current efficiency and a 0.72 kWh/kg Fe decrease in SEC when compared to the existing Pyror process. Furthermore, the use of the novel BM-5 AEM resulted in a 0.22 kWh/kg Fe lower SEC than that obtained with the commercial AEM, also showing mechanical stability in the EW flow cell. Finally, it was shown that below 5 g/L Fe, side reactions at the cathode resulted in a decrease in process efficiency, while 40 g/L yielded the highest efficiency and lowest SECs.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:03:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f16e90dee9fa449e84480446700ad23c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0375
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:03:59Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Membranes
spelling doaj.art-f16e90dee9fa449e84480446700ad23c2023-09-02T04:20:51ZengMDPI AGMembranes2077-03752019-10-0191113710.3390/membranes9110137membranes9110137Electrowinning of Iron from Spent Leaching Solutions Using Novel Anion Exchange MembranesWouter Dirk Badenhorst0Cloete Rossouw1Hyeongrae Cho2Jochen Kerres3Dolf Bruinsma4Henning Krieg5Focus Area: Chemical Resource Beneficiation, Faculty of Natural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South AfricaFocus Area: Chemical Resource Beneficiation, Faculty of Natural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South AfricaInstitute of Chemical Process Engineering, University of Stuttgart, D-70199 Stuttgart, GermanyFocus Area: Chemical Resource Beneficiation, Faculty of Natural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South AfricaBruinsma Solutions, 10 Mclagen Str., Potchefstroom 2531, South AfricaFocus Area: Chemical Resource Beneficiation, Faculty of Natural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South AfricaIn the Pyror process, electrowinning (EW) is used to recover acid and iron from spent leaching solutions (SLS), where a porous Terylene membrane acts as a separator between the cathode and anode. In this study, a novel anion exchange membrane (AEM)-based EW process is benchmarked against a process without and with a porous Terylene membrane by comparing the current efficiency, specific energy consumption (SEC), and sulfuric acid generation using an in-house constructed EW flow cell. Using an FAP-PK-130 commercial AEM, it was shown that the AEM-based process was more efficient than the traditional processes. Subsequently, 11 novel polybenzimidazole (PBI)-based blend AEMs were compared with the commercial AEM. The best performing novel AEM (BM-5), yielded a current efficiency of 95% at an SEC of 3.53 kWh/kg Fe, which is a 10% increase in current efficiency and a 0.72 kWh/kg Fe decrease in SEC when compared to the existing Pyror process. Furthermore, the use of the novel BM-5 AEM resulted in a 0.22 kWh/kg Fe lower SEC than that obtained with the commercial AEM, also showing mechanical stability in the EW flow cell. Finally, it was shown that below 5 g/L Fe, side reactions at the cathode resulted in a decrease in process efficiency, while 40 g/L yielded the highest efficiency and lowest SECs.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/9/11/137electrowinninganion exchange membraneswaste treatmentiron sulphate disposalacid regeneration
spellingShingle Wouter Dirk Badenhorst
Cloete Rossouw
Hyeongrae Cho
Jochen Kerres
Dolf Bruinsma
Henning Krieg
Electrowinning of Iron from Spent Leaching Solutions Using Novel Anion Exchange Membranes
Membranes
electrowinning
anion exchange membranes
waste treatment
iron sulphate disposal
acid regeneration
title Electrowinning of Iron from Spent Leaching Solutions Using Novel Anion Exchange Membranes
title_full Electrowinning of Iron from Spent Leaching Solutions Using Novel Anion Exchange Membranes
title_fullStr Electrowinning of Iron from Spent Leaching Solutions Using Novel Anion Exchange Membranes
title_full_unstemmed Electrowinning of Iron from Spent Leaching Solutions Using Novel Anion Exchange Membranes
title_short Electrowinning of Iron from Spent Leaching Solutions Using Novel Anion Exchange Membranes
title_sort electrowinning of iron from spent leaching solutions using novel anion exchange membranes
topic electrowinning
anion exchange membranes
waste treatment
iron sulphate disposal
acid regeneration
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/9/11/137
work_keys_str_mv AT wouterdirkbadenhorst electrowinningofironfromspentleachingsolutionsusingnovelanionexchangemembranes
AT cloeterossouw electrowinningofironfromspentleachingsolutionsusingnovelanionexchangemembranes
AT hyeongraecho electrowinningofironfromspentleachingsolutionsusingnovelanionexchangemembranes
AT jochenkerres electrowinningofironfromspentleachingsolutionsusingnovelanionexchangemembranes
AT dolfbruinsma electrowinningofironfromspentleachingsolutionsusingnovelanionexchangemembranes
AT henningkrieg electrowinningofironfromspentleachingsolutionsusingnovelanionexchangemembranes