Insurance barriers to substance use disorder treatment after passage of mental health and addiction parity laws and the affordable care act: A qualitative analysis

Introduction: : People who use drugs (PWUDs) in the United States historically have had a higher probability of being uninsured. Passage of the Affordable Care Act, the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Health Parity and Addiction Equity was expected to increase access to treatment for substance use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Dickson-Gomez, Margaret Weeks, Danielle Green, Sophie Boutouis, Carol Galletly, Erika Christenson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-06-01
Series:Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724622000294
_version_ 1811290625412169728
author Julia Dickson-Gomez
Margaret Weeks
Danielle Green
Sophie Boutouis
Carol Galletly
Erika Christenson
author_facet Julia Dickson-Gomez
Margaret Weeks
Danielle Green
Sophie Boutouis
Carol Galletly
Erika Christenson
author_sort Julia Dickson-Gomez
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: : People who use drugs (PWUDs) in the United States historically have had a higher probability of being uninsured. Passage of the Affordable Care Act, the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Health Parity and Addiction Equity was expected to increase access to treatment for substance use disorder. Few studies to date have conducted qualitative research with substance use disorder (SUD) treatment providers regarding Medicaid and other insurance coverage of SUD treatment following passage of the ACA and parity laws. The present paper fills this gap by reporting data from in-depth interviews with treatment providers from three states, Connecticut, Kentucky, and Wisconsin, that differ in implementation of the ACA. Methods: : Study teams in each state conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with key informants who provided SUD treatment, including providers of behavioral health residential or outpatient programs, office-based buprenorphine providers and opioid treatment programs [OTP, i.e. methadone clinics] (n = 24 in Connecticut, n = 63 in Kentucky and n = 63 in Wisconsin). Key informants were asked for their perceptions on how Medicaid and private insurance facilitates or limits access to drug treatment. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed for key themes using MAXQDA software using a collaborative approach. Results: : Results from this study suggest that the promise of the ACA and parity laws to increase access to SUD treatment has only partially been realized. There is wide variation among the three states’ Medicaid programs and among private insurance in the types of SUD treatment that is covered. Neither Kentucky's nor Connecticut's Medicaid covered methadone. Wisconsin Medicaid did not cover residential or intensive outpatient treatment. Thus, none of the states studied here provided all levels of care that the ASAM recommends for treating SUD. Further, there were several quantitative limits placed on SUD treatment such as number of urine drug screens or visits allowed. Providers complained that many treatments required prior authorizations, including MOUD like buprenorphine Conclusions: : More reform is needed to make SUD treatment accessible to all who need it. Such reforms should consider defining standards for opioid use disorder treatment with reference to evidence-based practices, not be attempting parity with an arbitrarily defined medical standard.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T04:15:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f174867c4f144da4bd21440003081ebf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2772-7246
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T04:15:59Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
spelling doaj.art-f174867c4f144da4bd21440003081ebf2022-12-22T03:02:58ZengElsevierDrug and Alcohol Dependence Reports2772-72462022-06-013100051Insurance barriers to substance use disorder treatment after passage of mental health and addiction parity laws and the affordable care act: A qualitative analysisJulia Dickson-Gomez0Margaret Weeks1Danielle Green2Sophie Boutouis3Carol Galletly4Erika Christenson5Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States; Corresponding author.Institute for Community Research, Hartford, CT, United StatesInstitute for Community Research, Hartford, CT, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas, Dallas, United StatesCenter for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United StatesCenter of Excellence in Women's Health, Boston Medical Center, BUSM, New EnglandIntroduction: : People who use drugs (PWUDs) in the United States historically have had a higher probability of being uninsured. Passage of the Affordable Care Act, the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Health Parity and Addiction Equity was expected to increase access to treatment for substance use disorder. Few studies to date have conducted qualitative research with substance use disorder (SUD) treatment providers regarding Medicaid and other insurance coverage of SUD treatment following passage of the ACA and parity laws. The present paper fills this gap by reporting data from in-depth interviews with treatment providers from three states, Connecticut, Kentucky, and Wisconsin, that differ in implementation of the ACA. Methods: : Study teams in each state conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with key informants who provided SUD treatment, including providers of behavioral health residential or outpatient programs, office-based buprenorphine providers and opioid treatment programs [OTP, i.e. methadone clinics] (n = 24 in Connecticut, n = 63 in Kentucky and n = 63 in Wisconsin). Key informants were asked for their perceptions on how Medicaid and private insurance facilitates or limits access to drug treatment. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed for key themes using MAXQDA software using a collaborative approach. Results: : Results from this study suggest that the promise of the ACA and parity laws to increase access to SUD treatment has only partially been realized. There is wide variation among the three states’ Medicaid programs and among private insurance in the types of SUD treatment that is covered. Neither Kentucky's nor Connecticut's Medicaid covered methadone. Wisconsin Medicaid did not cover residential or intensive outpatient treatment. Thus, none of the states studied here provided all levels of care that the ASAM recommends for treating SUD. Further, there were several quantitative limits placed on SUD treatment such as number of urine drug screens or visits allowed. Providers complained that many treatments required prior authorizations, including MOUD like buprenorphine Conclusions: : More reform is needed to make SUD treatment accessible to all who need it. Such reforms should consider defining standards for opioid use disorder treatment with reference to evidence-based practices, not be attempting parity with an arbitrarily defined medical standard.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724622000294Parity lawsSubstance use disorderMedications to treat opioid use disorderMethadoneBuprenorphineMedicaid
spellingShingle Julia Dickson-Gomez
Margaret Weeks
Danielle Green
Sophie Boutouis
Carol Galletly
Erika Christenson
Insurance barriers to substance use disorder treatment after passage of mental health and addiction parity laws and the affordable care act: A qualitative analysis
Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
Parity laws
Substance use disorder
Medications to treat opioid use disorder
Methadone
Buprenorphine
Medicaid
title Insurance barriers to substance use disorder treatment after passage of mental health and addiction parity laws and the affordable care act: A qualitative analysis
title_full Insurance barriers to substance use disorder treatment after passage of mental health and addiction parity laws and the affordable care act: A qualitative analysis
title_fullStr Insurance barriers to substance use disorder treatment after passage of mental health and addiction parity laws and the affordable care act: A qualitative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Insurance barriers to substance use disorder treatment after passage of mental health and addiction parity laws and the affordable care act: A qualitative analysis
title_short Insurance barriers to substance use disorder treatment after passage of mental health and addiction parity laws and the affordable care act: A qualitative analysis
title_sort insurance barriers to substance use disorder treatment after passage of mental health and addiction parity laws and the affordable care act a qualitative analysis
topic Parity laws
Substance use disorder
Medications to treat opioid use disorder
Methadone
Buprenorphine
Medicaid
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724622000294
work_keys_str_mv AT juliadicksongomez insurancebarrierstosubstanceusedisordertreatmentafterpassageofmentalhealthandaddictionparitylawsandtheaffordablecareactaqualitativeanalysis
AT margaretweeks insurancebarrierstosubstanceusedisordertreatmentafterpassageofmentalhealthandaddictionparitylawsandtheaffordablecareactaqualitativeanalysis
AT daniellegreen insurancebarrierstosubstanceusedisordertreatmentafterpassageofmentalhealthandaddictionparitylawsandtheaffordablecareactaqualitativeanalysis
AT sophieboutouis insurancebarrierstosubstanceusedisordertreatmentafterpassageofmentalhealthandaddictionparitylawsandtheaffordablecareactaqualitativeanalysis
AT carolgalletly insurancebarrierstosubstanceusedisordertreatmentafterpassageofmentalhealthandaddictionparitylawsandtheaffordablecareactaqualitativeanalysis
AT erikachristenson insurancebarrierstosubstanceusedisordertreatmentafterpassageofmentalhealthandaddictionparitylawsandtheaffordablecareactaqualitativeanalysis