Testing the effectiveness of environmental DNA (eDNA) to quantify larval amphibian abundance

Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring is rapidly becoming an established approach for detecting the presence of aquatic organisms and may also be useful for indexing or estimating species abundance. However, the link between eDNA concentration and abundance of individuals (i.e., density or bi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brie‐Anne A. Breton, Lynne Beaty, Amanda M. Bennett, Christopher J. Kyle, David Lesbarrères, Sibelle Torres Vilaça, Madison J. H. Wikston, Chris C. Wilson, Dennis L. Murray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-11-01
Series:Environmental DNA
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.332
_version_ 1811218249134637056
author Brie‐Anne A. Breton
Lynne Beaty
Amanda M. Bennett
Christopher J. Kyle
David Lesbarrères
Sibelle Torres Vilaça
Madison J. H. Wikston
Chris C. Wilson
Dennis L. Murray
author_facet Brie‐Anne A. Breton
Lynne Beaty
Amanda M. Bennett
Christopher J. Kyle
David Lesbarrères
Sibelle Torres Vilaça
Madison J. H. Wikston
Chris C. Wilson
Dennis L. Murray
author_sort Brie‐Anne A. Breton
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring is rapidly becoming an established approach for detecting the presence of aquatic organisms and may also be useful for indexing or estimating species abundance. However, the link between eDNA concentration and abundance of individuals (i.e., density or biomass) remains tenuous and may vary widely across species and environmental conditions. We investigated the relationship between eDNA concentration and abundance in two common and closely related amphibians in eastern North America, the wood frog (Rana sylvatica), and northern leopard frog (R. pipiens). We manipulated tadpole density in 80‐L mesocosms and documented the relationship between tadpole density and biomass and eDNA concentration through time. The two species differed in the amount of detectible genetic material produced, despite having comparable biomass. Concentration of eDNA increased with tadpole numbers and was primarily correlated with tadpole density in wood frogs and biomass in leopard frogs. eDNA degradation rates were rapid and comparable between species, with tadpoles becoming indetectable within 5 days post‐removal from the mesocosm, irrespective of tadpole density. Overall, our findings support that eDNA concentration has potential for tracking amphibian abundance in wetlands, but that indices of abundance are likely to be coarse and species‐specific calibration will be required. Future research should address how biotic and abiotic factors influence eDNA production, degradation, and recovery across species and through time before relying on eDNA for monitoring amphibian abundance in nature.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:07:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f1949913dfd94c72af2fba148b67ee09
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2637-4943
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:07:46Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Environmental DNA
spelling doaj.art-f1949913dfd94c72af2fba148b67ee092022-12-22T03:42:45ZengWileyEnvironmental DNA2637-49432022-11-01461229124010.1002/edn3.332Testing the effectiveness of environmental DNA (eDNA) to quantify larval amphibian abundanceBrie‐Anne A. Breton0Lynne Beaty1Amanda M. Bennett2Christopher J. Kyle3David Lesbarrères4Sibelle Torres Vilaça5Madison J. H. Wikston6Chris C. Wilson7Dennis L. Murray8Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program Trent University Peterborough Ontario CanadaBiology Department Trent University Peterborough Ontario CanadaEnvironmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program Trent University Peterborough Ontario CanadaEnvironmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program Trent University Peterborough Ontario CanadaGenetics and Ecology of Amphibian Research Group (GEARG), Department of Biology Laurentian University Sudbury Ontario CanadaEnvironmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program Trent University Peterborough Ontario CanadaEnvironmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program Trent University Peterborough Ontario CanadaAquatic Research and Monitoring Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Trent University Peterborough Ontario CanadaEnvironmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program Trent University Peterborough Ontario CanadaAbstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring is rapidly becoming an established approach for detecting the presence of aquatic organisms and may also be useful for indexing or estimating species abundance. However, the link between eDNA concentration and abundance of individuals (i.e., density or biomass) remains tenuous and may vary widely across species and environmental conditions. We investigated the relationship between eDNA concentration and abundance in two common and closely related amphibians in eastern North America, the wood frog (Rana sylvatica), and northern leopard frog (R. pipiens). We manipulated tadpole density in 80‐L mesocosms and documented the relationship between tadpole density and biomass and eDNA concentration through time. The two species differed in the amount of detectible genetic material produced, despite having comparable biomass. Concentration of eDNA increased with tadpole numbers and was primarily correlated with tadpole density in wood frogs and biomass in leopard frogs. eDNA degradation rates were rapid and comparable between species, with tadpoles becoming indetectable within 5 days post‐removal from the mesocosm, irrespective of tadpole density. Overall, our findings support that eDNA concentration has potential for tracking amphibian abundance in wetlands, but that indices of abundance are likely to be coarse and species‐specific calibration will be required. Future research should address how biotic and abiotic factors influence eDNA production, degradation, and recovery across species and through time before relying on eDNA for monitoring amphibian abundance in nature.https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.332
spellingShingle Brie‐Anne A. Breton
Lynne Beaty
Amanda M. Bennett
Christopher J. Kyle
David Lesbarrères
Sibelle Torres Vilaça
Madison J. H. Wikston
Chris C. Wilson
Dennis L. Murray
Testing the effectiveness of environmental DNA (eDNA) to quantify larval amphibian abundance
Environmental DNA
title Testing the effectiveness of environmental DNA (eDNA) to quantify larval amphibian abundance
title_full Testing the effectiveness of environmental DNA (eDNA) to quantify larval amphibian abundance
title_fullStr Testing the effectiveness of environmental DNA (eDNA) to quantify larval amphibian abundance
title_full_unstemmed Testing the effectiveness of environmental DNA (eDNA) to quantify larval amphibian abundance
title_short Testing the effectiveness of environmental DNA (eDNA) to quantify larval amphibian abundance
title_sort testing the effectiveness of environmental dna edna to quantify larval amphibian abundance
url https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.332
work_keys_str_mv AT brieanneabreton testingtheeffectivenessofenvironmentaldnaednatoquantifylarvalamphibianabundance
AT lynnebeaty testingtheeffectivenessofenvironmentaldnaednatoquantifylarvalamphibianabundance
AT amandambennett testingtheeffectivenessofenvironmentaldnaednatoquantifylarvalamphibianabundance
AT christopherjkyle testingtheeffectivenessofenvironmentaldnaednatoquantifylarvalamphibianabundance
AT davidlesbarreres testingtheeffectivenessofenvironmentaldnaednatoquantifylarvalamphibianabundance
AT sibelletorresvilaca testingtheeffectivenessofenvironmentaldnaednatoquantifylarvalamphibianabundance
AT madisonjhwikston testingtheeffectivenessofenvironmentaldnaednatoquantifylarvalamphibianabundance
AT chriscwilson testingtheeffectivenessofenvironmentaldnaednatoquantifylarvalamphibianabundance
AT dennislmurray testingtheeffectivenessofenvironmentaldnaednatoquantifylarvalamphibianabundance