Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Using a New Monotype Zirconia Implant—A Case Report

Currently, titanium or specific titanium alloys are the most often used materials for the fabrication of dental implants. Many studies have confirmed the osseointegrative capacity and clinical long-term performance of moderately rough titanium implants. However, disadvantages have also been reported...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefan Roehling, Georges Ghazal, Thomas Borer, Florian Thieringer, Michael Gahlert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-09-01
Series:Dentistry Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/3/3/79
_version_ 1811262574346371072
author Stefan Roehling
Georges Ghazal
Thomas Borer
Florian Thieringer
Michael Gahlert
author_facet Stefan Roehling
Georges Ghazal
Thomas Borer
Florian Thieringer
Michael Gahlert
author_sort Stefan Roehling
collection DOAJ
description Currently, titanium or specific titanium alloys are the most often used materials for the fabrication of dental implants. Many studies have confirmed the osseointegrative capacity and clinical long-term performance of moderately rough titanium implants. However, disadvantages have also been reported with regard to peri-implant infections and the titanium metal properties. Tooth colored ceramic implants have attracted the interest of clinicians since the end of the 1960s. Initially, alumina was used for the fabrication of ceramic implants; however, due to the poor biomechanical properties, alumina implants are not commercially available any more. Since end of the 1990s, zirconia has been established in dentistry due to its superior biomechanical properties compared to other oxide ceramics such as alumina. Currently, zirconia is the material of choice for the fabrication of ceramic implants. Zirconia implants show superior biocompatibility compared to titanium and other metals. Additionally, it has been reported that zirconia implants with a micro-rough surface topography show at least a comparable osseointegrative capacity and similar clinical survival rates to moderately rough titanium implants. The present case reports a fixed implant-supported reconstruction of a large edentulous space with compromised local bone conditions using new monotype zirconia dental implants with a micro-rough surface topography.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T19:29:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f19c3eb1bf0f4ebb828b4fb7b9452562
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-6767
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T19:29:07Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Dentistry Journal
spelling doaj.art-f19c3eb1bf0f4ebb828b4fb7b94525622022-12-22T03:19:25ZengMDPI AGDentistry Journal2304-67672015-09-0133799210.3390/dj3030079dj3030079Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Using a New Monotype Zirconia Implant—A Case ReportStefan Roehling0Georges Ghazal1Thomas Borer2Florian Thieringer3Michael Gahlert4Clinic for Oral- and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Hightech Research Center, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031 Basel, SwitzerlandClinic for Oral- and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstr., 5001 Aarau, SwitzerlandClinic for Oral- and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstr., 5001 Aarau, SwitzerlandClinic for Oral- and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Hightech Research Center, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031 Basel, SwitzerlandClinic for Oral- and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Hightech Research Center, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031 Basel, SwitzerlandCurrently, titanium or specific titanium alloys are the most often used materials for the fabrication of dental implants. Many studies have confirmed the osseointegrative capacity and clinical long-term performance of moderately rough titanium implants. However, disadvantages have also been reported with regard to peri-implant infections and the titanium metal properties. Tooth colored ceramic implants have attracted the interest of clinicians since the end of the 1960s. Initially, alumina was used for the fabrication of ceramic implants; however, due to the poor biomechanical properties, alumina implants are not commercially available any more. Since end of the 1990s, zirconia has been established in dentistry due to its superior biomechanical properties compared to other oxide ceramics such as alumina. Currently, zirconia is the material of choice for the fabrication of ceramic implants. Zirconia implants show superior biocompatibility compared to titanium and other metals. Additionally, it has been reported that zirconia implants with a micro-rough surface topography show at least a comparable osseointegrative capacity and similar clinical survival rates to moderately rough titanium implants. The present case reports a fixed implant-supported reconstruction of a large edentulous space with compromised local bone conditions using new monotype zirconia dental implants with a micro-rough surface topography.http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/3/3/79zirconium dioxidezirconiaosseointegrationmonotype ceramic implantscase reportclinical application
spellingShingle Stefan Roehling
Georges Ghazal
Thomas Borer
Florian Thieringer
Michael Gahlert
Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Using a New Monotype Zirconia Implant—A Case Report
Dentistry Journal
zirconium dioxide
zirconia
osseointegration
monotype ceramic implants
case report
clinical application
title Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Using a New Monotype Zirconia Implant—A Case Report
title_full Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Using a New Monotype Zirconia Implant—A Case Report
title_fullStr Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Using a New Monotype Zirconia Implant—A Case Report
title_full_unstemmed Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Using a New Monotype Zirconia Implant—A Case Report
title_short Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Using a New Monotype Zirconia Implant—A Case Report
title_sort implant supported fixed dental prostheses using a new monotype zirconia implant a case report
topic zirconium dioxide
zirconia
osseointegration
monotype ceramic implants
case report
clinical application
url http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/3/3/79
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanroehling implantsupportedfixeddentalprosthesesusinganewmonotypezirconiaimplantacasereport
AT georgesghazal implantsupportedfixeddentalprosthesesusinganewmonotypezirconiaimplantacasereport
AT thomasborer implantsupportedfixeddentalprosthesesusinganewmonotypezirconiaimplantacasereport
AT florianthieringer implantsupportedfixeddentalprosthesesusinganewmonotypezirconiaimplantacasereport
AT michaelgahlert implantsupportedfixeddentalprosthesesusinganewmonotypezirconiaimplantacasereport