Neoliberal restructuring, disabled people and social (in)security in Australia and Britain

This paper examines recent social security policies in Australia and the UK for workless disabled people. The paper outlines developments in both countries over the past two decades and points to the fact that while there may be differences in the detail, the trends in such policies in the two count...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chris Grover, Karen Soldatic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Stockholm University Press 2012-10-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sjdr.se/articles/463
_version_ 1797706553411764224
author Chris Grover
Karen Soldatic
author_facet Chris Grover
Karen Soldatic
author_sort Chris Grover
collection DOAJ
description This paper examines recent social security policies in Australia and the UK for workless disabled people. The paper outlines developments in both countries over the past two decades and points to the fact that while there may be differences in the detail, the trends in such policies in the two countries are similar. This involves moves towards stricter eligibility criteria, greater expectation of workless disabled people to make efforts to (re)enter paid employment and, through such processes, a redrawing of the ‘disability category’ that denotes the ‘truly’ disabled from those who are deemed capable of doing at least some paid work. The paper goes on to consider explanations of such change, arguing that liberal explanations in the social administration tradition are problematic and that they, therefore, need to be placed within the neoliberal project, in particular its concern with putting people to work. The paper concludes that this has essentially involved a redrawing of the disability category to ensure a smaller number of people of working age in both countries can legitimately claim an existence outside of paid work. The paper also argues that more comparative research is required to understand the impacts of such trends on disabled people and provide insights for those resisting the influence of neoliberalism on welfare regimes.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T05:53:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f19c7addfd5641c9a238d94f5a3d768e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1501-7419
1745-3011
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T05:53:02Z
publishDate 2012-10-01
publisher Stockholm University Press
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
spelling doaj.art-f19c7addfd5641c9a238d94f5a3d768e2023-09-03T04:59:33ZengStockholm University PressScandinavian Journal of Disability Research1501-74191745-30112012-10-0115321623210.1080/15017419.2012.724446392Neoliberal restructuring, disabled people and social (in)security in Australia and BritainChris Grover0Karen Soldatic1Department of Applied Social Science, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UKSchool of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaThis paper examines recent social security policies in Australia and the UK for workless disabled people. The paper outlines developments in both countries over the past two decades and points to the fact that while there may be differences in the detail, the trends in such policies in the two countries are similar. This involves moves towards stricter eligibility criteria, greater expectation of workless disabled people to make efforts to (re)enter paid employment and, through such processes, a redrawing of the ‘disability category’ that denotes the ‘truly’ disabled from those who are deemed capable of doing at least some paid work. The paper goes on to consider explanations of such change, arguing that liberal explanations in the social administration tradition are problematic and that they, therefore, need to be placed within the neoliberal project, in particular its concern with putting people to work. The paper concludes that this has essentially involved a redrawing of the disability category to ensure a smaller number of people of working age in both countries can legitimately claim an existence outside of paid work. The paper also argues that more comparative research is required to understand the impacts of such trends on disabled people and provide insights for those resisting the influence of neoliberalism on welfare regimes.https://www.sjdr.se/articles/463Australiadisabilityneoliberalismrestructuringsocial securityUK
spellingShingle Chris Grover
Karen Soldatic
Neoliberal restructuring, disabled people and social (in)security in Australia and Britain
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Australia
disability
neoliberalism
restructuring
social security
UK
title Neoliberal restructuring, disabled people and social (in)security in Australia and Britain
title_full Neoliberal restructuring, disabled people and social (in)security in Australia and Britain
title_fullStr Neoliberal restructuring, disabled people and social (in)security in Australia and Britain
title_full_unstemmed Neoliberal restructuring, disabled people and social (in)security in Australia and Britain
title_short Neoliberal restructuring, disabled people and social (in)security in Australia and Britain
title_sort neoliberal restructuring disabled people and social in security in australia and britain
topic Australia
disability
neoliberalism
restructuring
social security
UK
url https://www.sjdr.se/articles/463
work_keys_str_mv AT chrisgrover neoliberalrestructuringdisabledpeopleandsocialinsecurityinaustraliaandbritain
AT karensoldatic neoliberalrestructuringdisabledpeopleandsocialinsecurityinaustraliaandbritain