Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation versus transvenous catheter ablation in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (HARTCAP-AF): study protocol for a randomized trial

Abstract Background Success rates with conventional transvenous endocardial pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are variable due to advanced electrical and structural remodeling of the atria. As a consequence, more extensive endoc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mindy Vroomen, Mark La Meir, Bart Maesen, Justin G. L. Luermans, Kevin Vernooy, Brigitte Essers, Bianca T. A. de Greef, Jos G. Maessen, Harry J. Crijns, Laurent Pison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3365-9
_version_ 1831688800695222272
author Mindy Vroomen
Mark La Meir
Bart Maesen
Justin G. L. Luermans
Kevin Vernooy
Brigitte Essers
Bianca T. A. de Greef
Jos G. Maessen
Harry J. Crijns
Laurent Pison
author_facet Mindy Vroomen
Mark La Meir
Bart Maesen
Justin G. L. Luermans
Kevin Vernooy
Brigitte Essers
Bianca T. A. de Greef
Jos G. Maessen
Harry J. Crijns
Laurent Pison
author_sort Mindy Vroomen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Success rates with conventional transvenous endocardial pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are variable due to advanced electrical and structural remodeling of the atria. As a consequence, more extensive endocardial lesions, minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical techniques, and hybrid ablation (combining thoracoscopic epicardial surgical and endocardial catheter ablation) have been developed. Hypothesis The HARTCAP-AF trial hypothesizes that hybrid AF ablation is more effective than (repeated) transvenous endocardial catheter ablation in (longstanding) persistent AF, without increasing the number of associated major adverse events. Methods This randomized controlled trial will include 40 patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF who will be 1:1 randomized to either hybrid ablation or (repeated) catheter ablation. The procedures and follow-up are conducted according to the guidelines. The primary effectiveness endpoint is freedom from any supraventricular arrhythmia lasting longer than 5 min without the use of Vaughan-Williams class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs through 12 months of follow-up after the last procedure. In the catheter ablation arm, a second procedure planned within 6 months after the index procedure is allowed for obtaining the primary endpoint. Additionally, adverse events, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life data will be recorded. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02441738. Registered on 12 May 2015.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T10:34:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f1a02903f2ef4adabafa3500bb8c0403
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6215
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T10:34:50Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj.art-f1a02903f2ef4adabafa3500bb8c04032022-12-21T19:43:39ZengBMCTrials1745-62152019-06-0120111110.1186/s13063-019-3365-9Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation versus transvenous catheter ablation in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (HARTCAP-AF): study protocol for a randomized trialMindy Vroomen0Mark La Meir1Bart Maesen2Justin G. L. Luermans3Kevin Vernooy4Brigitte Essers5Bianca T. A. de Greef6Jos G. Maessen7Harry J. Crijns8Laurent Pison9Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical CenterDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical CenterDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical CentreDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology AssessmentDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology AssessmentDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical CenterDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical CentreAbstract Background Success rates with conventional transvenous endocardial pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are variable due to advanced electrical and structural remodeling of the atria. As a consequence, more extensive endocardial lesions, minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical techniques, and hybrid ablation (combining thoracoscopic epicardial surgical and endocardial catheter ablation) have been developed. Hypothesis The HARTCAP-AF trial hypothesizes that hybrid AF ablation is more effective than (repeated) transvenous endocardial catheter ablation in (longstanding) persistent AF, without increasing the number of associated major adverse events. Methods This randomized controlled trial will include 40 patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF who will be 1:1 randomized to either hybrid ablation or (repeated) catheter ablation. The procedures and follow-up are conducted according to the guidelines. The primary effectiveness endpoint is freedom from any supraventricular arrhythmia lasting longer than 5 min without the use of Vaughan-Williams class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs through 12 months of follow-up after the last procedure. In the catheter ablation arm, a second procedure planned within 6 months after the index procedure is allowed for obtaining the primary endpoint. Additionally, adverse events, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life data will be recorded. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02441738. Registered on 12 May 2015.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3365-9Atrial fibrillationPersistentLongstanding persistentHybrid ablationCatheter ablation
spellingShingle Mindy Vroomen
Mark La Meir
Bart Maesen
Justin G. L. Luermans
Kevin Vernooy
Brigitte Essers
Bianca T. A. de Greef
Jos G. Maessen
Harry J. Crijns
Laurent Pison
Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation versus transvenous catheter ablation in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (HARTCAP-AF): study protocol for a randomized trial
Trials
Atrial fibrillation
Persistent
Longstanding persistent
Hybrid ablation
Catheter ablation
title Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation versus transvenous catheter ablation in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (HARTCAP-AF): study protocol for a randomized trial
title_full Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation versus transvenous catheter ablation in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (HARTCAP-AF): study protocol for a randomized trial
title_fullStr Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation versus transvenous catheter ablation in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (HARTCAP-AF): study protocol for a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation versus transvenous catheter ablation in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (HARTCAP-AF): study protocol for a randomized trial
title_short Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation versus transvenous catheter ablation in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (HARTCAP-AF): study protocol for a randomized trial
title_sort hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation versus transvenous catheter ablation in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation hartcap af study protocol for a randomized trial
topic Atrial fibrillation
Persistent
Longstanding persistent
Hybrid ablation
Catheter ablation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3365-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mindyvroomen hybridthoracoscopicsurgicalandtransvenouscatheterablationversustransvenouscatheterablationinpersistentandlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationhartcapafstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT marklameir hybridthoracoscopicsurgicalandtransvenouscatheterablationversustransvenouscatheterablationinpersistentandlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationhartcapafstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT bartmaesen hybridthoracoscopicsurgicalandtransvenouscatheterablationversustransvenouscatheterablationinpersistentandlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationhartcapafstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT justinglluermans hybridthoracoscopicsurgicalandtransvenouscatheterablationversustransvenouscatheterablationinpersistentandlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationhartcapafstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT kevinvernooy hybridthoracoscopicsurgicalandtransvenouscatheterablationversustransvenouscatheterablationinpersistentandlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationhartcapafstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT brigitteessers hybridthoracoscopicsurgicalandtransvenouscatheterablationversustransvenouscatheterablationinpersistentandlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationhartcapafstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT biancatadegreef hybridthoracoscopicsurgicalandtransvenouscatheterablationversustransvenouscatheterablationinpersistentandlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationhartcapafstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT josgmaessen hybridthoracoscopicsurgicalandtransvenouscatheterablationversustransvenouscatheterablationinpersistentandlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationhartcapafstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT harryjcrijns hybridthoracoscopicsurgicalandtransvenouscatheterablationversustransvenouscatheterablationinpersistentandlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationhartcapafstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT laurentpison hybridthoracoscopicsurgicalandtransvenouscatheterablationversustransvenouscatheterablationinpersistentandlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationhartcapafstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial